Identifying and evaluating strategic partners for collaborative R&D: Index-based approach using patents and publications

Abstract Identifying and selecting appropriate strategic partners have been the subject of many previous studies: but most have dealt with partner selection that has relied heavily on experts' judgements: the value of a literature-based quantitative approach as a source of technology intelligence has seldom been addressed. This paper therefore aims to develop a systematic framework to guide strategic partner selection, taking a literature-based approach. Reviewing the factors that can lead to successful R&D partnerships to develop partner selection criteria, we designed 14 indexes – grouped into four major categories – to reflect desirable partner characteristics, and used the literature data to suggest a framework for prioritising potential partners. As data sources, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the ISI Web of Science databases are adopted for patent analysis and publication analysis, respectively. This research applied the framework to identify strategic R&D partners for Korean firms and found that the use of literature data enabled a wide ranging search for potential partners and the quick analysis of their characteristics, with results that provided objective evidence for selection decisions. It also investigated the relative importance of literature databases and that of the four decision criteria by industry, and examined the relationships between the indexes to improve the application of the framework. The suggested framework is expected to be valuable as a complementary tool for decision-making about R&D collaboration.

[1]  Patrick Thomas,et al.  A relationship between technology indicators and stock market performance , 2001, Scientometrics.

[2]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Technological dynamism in Asia , 2003 .

[3]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[4]  Anne Banks Pidduck Issues in supplier partner selection , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[5]  Luigi Benfratello,et al.  Research Joint Ventures and Firm Level Performance , 2000 .

[6]  Africa Ariño,et al.  Learning From Failure: Towards An Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures , 1998 .

[7]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patent information for strategic technology management , 2003 .

[8]  J. C. F. D. Arroyabe,et al.  The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2008 .

[9]  K. Sauvant World Investment Report , 1999 .

[10]  Yadong Lu,et al.  Joint venture success in China: How should we select a good partner? , 1998 .

[11]  Lucio Picci,et al.  The Internationalization of Inventive Activity: A Gravity Model Using Patent Data , 2010 .

[12]  Timothy Schoenecker,et al.  Indicators of firm technological capability: validity and performance implications , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[13]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  F. Narin,et al.  Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock Performance , 1999 .

[15]  L. Ellram The Supplier Selection Decision in Strategic Partnerships , 1990 .

[16]  Zhenzhong Ma,et al.  Booming or emerging? China's technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities , 2009 .

[17]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[18]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[19]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective , 1995 .

[20]  Jacques Michel,et al.  Patent citation analysis.A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports , 2001, Scientometrics.

[21]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry–academia collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment , 2005 .

[22]  Bernard Dousset,et al.  Combining mining and visualization tools to discover the geographic structure of a domain , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[23]  Luc Soete,et al.  The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: The evidence reconsidered* , 1987 .

[24]  T. Das,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[25]  Raymond Radosevich,et al.  Strategic alliances as a source of early-stage seed capital in new technology-based firms , 2000 .

[26]  Peder Olesen Larsen,et al.  Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research , 2007, Scientometrics.

[27]  P. Patel,et al.  Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages. , 1999 .

[28]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[29]  Anthony F. Breitzman,et al.  The many applications of patent analysis , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[30]  N. Srinivasan,et al.  A model of value assessment in collaborative R&D programs , 2002 .

[31]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Measuring Performance of International Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[32]  Timothy J. Wilkinson,et al.  Strategic alliances: Choose your partners , 1995 .

[33]  B. M. Gupta,et al.  Patent Statistics as Indicators of Competition an Analysis of Patenting in Biotechnology , 2004, Scientometrics.

[34]  Fr¬¥ed¬¥erique Sachwald,et al.  Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis , 2003 .

[35]  M. Hitt,et al.  Partner Selection in Emerging and Developed Market Contexts: Resource-Based and Organizational Learning Perspectives , 2000 .

[36]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  A New Indicator of Technological Capabilities for Developed and Developing Countries (Arco) , 2004 .

[37]  Christian Sternitzke,et al.  Patent and literature statistics – The case of optoelectronics☆ , 2007 .

[38]  Edward Levitas,et al.  Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of U.S. and Korean firms , 1997 .

[39]  M.M.S. Karki,et al.  Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool , 1997 .

[40]  J. Hagedoorn Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[41]  J. Dekker Survey of the annual technical reports 1982 of the patent offices , 1983 .

[42]  U. Secretariat World Investment Report 2005—Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D , 2006 .

[43]  B. Tether Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[44]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[46]  Sheu Hua Chen,et al.  Applying ANP approach to partner selection for strategic alliance , 2008 .

[47]  Jiatao Li,et al.  Global R&D Alliances in China: Collaborations With Universities and Research Institutes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[48]  Tim Rowley,et al.  Inertia and Evaluation Mechanisms in Interorganizational Partner Selection: Syndicate Formation among U.S. Investment Banks , 2002 .

[49]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[50]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The Global Innovation Scoreboard 2008: The Dynamics of the Innovative Performances of Countries , 2009 .

[51]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Collaborating for new product development: Selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value , 2006 .

[52]  M. Hitt,et al.  Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 2002 .

[53]  B. V. P. D. L. Potterie,et al.  The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data , 2001 .

[54]  Zhenzhong Ma,et al.  Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980–2005 , 2008 .

[55]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  The technology clubs: the distribution of knowledge across nations , 2008 .

[56]  E. Garfield,et al.  Citation data: their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making , 1992 .

[57]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[58]  F. Narin,et al.  Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents , 1991 .

[59]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Strategic Determinants of Partner Selection Criteria in International Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[60]  Jiang Wen,et al.  Exploring collaborative R&D network:: some new evidence in Japan , 2001 .

[61]  Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli,et al.  The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis , 2011 .

[62]  R. Narula R&D Collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation , 2004 .

[63]  B. Nielsen An Empirical Investigation of the Drivers of International Strategic Alliance Formation , 2003 .

[64]  Irina Skorobogatykh,et al.  Partner Selection and Trust Building in West European–Russian Joint Ventures , 1997 .

[65]  J. Meredith,et al.  The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co-citation analysis , 2009 .

[66]  Masao Nakamura,et al.  Research alliances and collaborations: Introduction to the special issue , 2003 .

[67]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Who cooperates on R&D? , 2001 .

[68]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[69]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[70]  Jasjit Singh Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[71]  C. L. Bas,et al.  'Location versus home country advantages' in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals' locational strategies , 2002 .

[72]  Patrick Thomas,et al.  Using Science and Technology Indicators to Manage R&D as a Business , 2001 .

[73]  J. Leker,et al.  Different dimensions of knowledge in cooperative R&D projects of university scientists , 2011 .