Extensive statistical analysis of the variability of concrete rebound hardness based on a large database of 60 years experience

Abstract Non-destructive testing methods for concrete structures require statistical validation of reliability model parameters. Present paper studies a comprehensive database of several thousand test locations for the better understanding of the statistical characteristics of rebound hardness of concrete and highlights that several gaps are found both in current technical literature and standardisation. Detailed evaluation is provided on repeatability and influencing parameters. Results of statistical analyses are presented for the within-test standard deviation, coefficient of variation, range and studentized range of rebound indices. Indications for the reconsideration of particular statements in the technical literature and standards are given.

[1]  Konrad Zilch,et al.  fib-Bulletin: Structural concrete: Textbook on behaviour, Design and performance , 1999 .

[2]  H. Leon Harter,et al.  Tables of Range and Studentized Range , 1960 .

[3]  T. Soshiroda,et al.  Early-stage inspection of concrete quality in structures by combined nondestructive method , 2005 .

[4]  I. Soroka.  On compressive strength variation in concrete , 1971 .

[5]  A. Neville.  Properties of Concrete , 1968 .

[6]  Giuseppina Uva,et al.  On the dispersion of data collected by in situ diagnostic of the existing concrete , 2013 .

[7]  V. M. Malhotra,et al.  CRC Handbook on Nondestructive Testing of Concrete , 1990 .

[8]  D. Breysse,et al.  Nondestructive evaluation of concrete strength: An historical review and a new perspective by combining NDT methods , 2012 .

[9]  Mehmet Ali Tasdemir,et al.  Factors determining the correlations between high strength concrete properties , 2011 .

[10]  Student.  Errors of Routine Analysis , 1927 .

[11]  Jean-Marie Dufour,et al.  Simulation�?Based Finite Sample Normality Tests in Linear Regressions , 1998 .

[12]  S. Grab,et al.  The use of the Schmidt Hammer and Equotip for rock hardness assessment in geomorphology and heritage science: a comparative analysis , 2011 .

[13]  E. Kolaiti,et al.  Evaluation of schmidt rebound hammer testing: A critical approach , 1993 .

[14]  A. Borosnyói,et al.  Understanding the rebound surface hardness of concrete , 2015 .

[15]  A. M. Leshchinsky,et al.  Within-test variability of some non-destructive methods for concrete strength determination , 1990 .

[16]  D. C. Teychenné.  Recommendations for the treatment of the variations of concrete strength in codes of practice , 1973 .

[17]  Juan Luis Fernández-Martínez,et al.  Erratum to: Assessing concrete strength with rebound hammer: review of key issues and ideas for more reliable conclusions , 2014 .

[19]  A. Fischer-Cripps,et al.  Introduction to Contact Mechanics , 2000 .

[20]  A. Borosnyói,et al.  Static indentation hardness testing of concrete: a long established method revived , 2011 .

[21]  Nicholas J. Carino.  Statistical Methods to Evaluate in-Place Test Results , 1993 .

[22]  Denys Breysse,et al.  Non-Destructive Assessment of Concrete Structures: Reliability and Limits of Single and Combined Techniques , 2012 .

[23]  Iain E. Garden Richardson,et al.  Design and Performance , 2004 .

[24]  J. H. Bungey,et al.  Testing concrete in structures , 1989 .

[25]  Adorján Borosnyói,et al.  Rebound surface hardness of concrete: Introduction of an empirical constitutive model , 2011 .

[26]  Angelo Masi,et al.  An experimental study on the within-member variability of in situ concrete strength in RC building structures , 2013 .

[27]  M. Petrou,et al.  Influence of cold weather during casting and curing on the stiffness and strength of concrete , 2013 .

[28]  MODEL FOR THE QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION OF THE KINETICS OF HARDENING OF PORTLAND CEMENTS , 1987 .