Unsteady, Nonuniform Landslide Motion: 1. Theoretical Dynamics and the Steady Datum State

Unsteady, nonuniform motion of persistently active landslides is a process of widespread importance. A general, three-dimensional theory aimed at elucidating this process is developed from physical principles and field measurements of landslide behavior. The theory employs a versatile constitutive model that represents landslides as deformable bodies composed of frictional, nonlinear viscoplastic material. The three-dimensional theory is reduced to a mathematically tracTable form by defining an ideal landslide datum state that consists of steady, unidirectional shear flow driven by ground-water seepage and gravitational forces. Solution of the datum-state equation of motion yields vertical landslide velocity profiles that can represent deformation styles ranging from shear-thickening viscoplastic flow to perfectly plastic frictional slip. This range of theoretical profiles encompasses the range of profiles measured in four persistently active northern California landslides. Also obtained from the datum-state equation of motion is an analytical solution for datum-state landslide sediment fluxes. An important feature of this solution is that it represents theoretical landslide sediment fluxes as a family of continuous-functions. The solution thus provides a mathematical basis for a general perturbation analysis of the kinematics of unsteady, nonuniform landslide motion, which will be presented in a companion paper in a subsequent issue of the Journal.

[1]  Richard M. Iverson,et al.  Unsteady, Nonuniform Landslide Motion: 2. Linearized Theory and the Kinematics of Transient Response , 1986, The Journal of geology.

[2]  W. L. Wilkinson,et al.  Non-Newtonian Fluids : Fluid Mechanics, Mixing and Heat Transfer , 1960 .

[3]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  6 Complex mass-movement terrains in the western Cascade Range, Oregon , 1977 .

[4]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  Fundamentals of soil mechanics , 1948 .

[5]  Sidney Paige,et al.  Application of geology to engineering practice , 1950 .

[6]  William Z. Savage,et al.  A Model for Creeping Flow in Landslides , 1982 .

[7]  L. E. Malvern.  Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium , 1969 .

[8]  Wai-Fah Chen.  Plasticity in Soil Mechanics and Landslides , 1980 .

[9]  B. C. Yen.  Stability of Slopes Undergoing Creep Deformation , 1969 .

[10]  D. B. Prior,et al.  Explanation Of Submarine Landslide Morphology By Stability Analysis And Rheological Models , 1978 .

[11]  John F Nye,et al.  The response of glaciers and ice-sheets to seasonal and climatic changes , 1960, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[12]  H. Kelsey.  A sediment budget and an analysis of geomorphic process in the Van Duzen River basin, north coastal California, 1941–1975: Summary , 1980 .

[13]  J. N. Hutchinson,et al.  Potentially dangerous surges in an Antrim mudslide , 1974, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[14]  N R Morgenstern,et al.  METHODS OF STABILITY ANALYSIS , 1978 .

[15]  J. Bear.  Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[16]  D. B. Prior,et al.  Some Movement Patterns of Temperate Mudflows: Examples from Northeastern Ireland , 1972 .

[17]  Arvid M. Johnson,et al.  Earth flows; morphology, mobilization, and movement , 1983 .

[18]  Kanatani Ken-Ichi,et al.  A plasticity theory for the kinematics of ideal granular materials , 1982 .

[19]  D. C. Drucker,et al.  Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design , 1952 .

[20]  E. Blackwelder.  The Gros Ventre slide, an active earth-flow , 1912 .

[21]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[22]  J. N. Hutchinson.  A Coastal Mudflow on the London Clay Cliffs at Beltinge, North Kent , 1970 .

[23]  H. Kelsey.  Earthflows in Franciscan melange, Van Duzen River basin, California , 1978 .