Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies

This article presents a study of the teacher trainees in an English department who have received instruction in metacognitive awareness for reading comprehension. Metacognition or ‘thinking about thinking’ involves the awareness and regulation of thinking processes. Metacognitive strategies are those strategies which require students to think about their own thinking as they engage in academic tasks. Within this study, students have been taught metacognitive strategies for reading in a five week program they have joined voluntarily. The students have used reading logs to reflect on their own thinking processes as they have been engaged in reading tasks. The purpose of the study is to determine the effectiveness of systematic direct instruction of multiple metacognitive strategies designed to assist students in comprehending text. Specifically, the reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of 130 third year university students has been investigated to determine whether instruction incorporating metacognitive strategies has led to an increase in the reading comprehension of expository texts. In addition, the investigation is also designed to determine the impact of the metacognitive strategies on vocabulary.

[1]  Patricia L. Carrell.  Awareness of Text Structure: Effects on Recall* , 1992 .

[2]  C. Bazerman.  Physicists Reading Physics , 1985 .

[3]  Rebecca L. Oxford,et al.  A Closer Look at Learning Strategies, L2 Proficiency, and Gender , 1995 .

[4]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Metacognitive Strategy Instruction , 1986 .

[5]  Patricia L. Carrell,et al.  METACOGNITIVE AWARENESS AND SECOND LANGUAGE READING , 1989 .

[6]  Elizabeth Hegarty-Hazel.  The Student laboratory and the science curriculum , 1990 .

[7]  Peter Afflerbach,et al.  Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading , 1996 .

[8]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. , 1990 .

[9]  Linda Markstein,et al.  Expanding Reading Skills-Advanced , 2000 .

[10]  Gail P. Baxter,et al.  2. Assessing Metacognition andSelf-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[11]  J. Flavell.  Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .

[12]  D. Kuhn.  Metacognitive Development , 2000 .

[13]  Michael Pressley,et al.  What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of , 2000 .

[14]  P. Pintrich.  The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[15]  Lei Li,et al.  THE ROLE OF GOAL-ORIENTATION IN SELF-REGULATED LEARNING , 2001 .

[16]  Diana Percy,et al.  The Process of Learning , 1989 .

[17]  Michael Pressley,et al.  The Comprehension Instruction That Students Need: Instruction Fostering Constructively Responsive Reading. , 1995 .

[18]  Roman Taraban,et al.  ANALYTIC AND PRAGMATIC FACTORS IN COLLEGE STUDENTS' METACOGNITIVE READING STRATEGIES , 2004 .

[19]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning From Text: A Multidimensional and Developmental Perspective , 2000 .

[20]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Studying as self-regulated learning. , 1998 .

[21]  Gao Hai-yu,et al.  Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition , 2007 .

[22]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension Strategies: A Natural History of One Program for Enhancing Learning. Technical Report No. 334. , 1985 .

[23]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[24]  P. Raymond,et al.  The Effects of Structure Strategy Training on the Recall of Expository Prose for University Students Reading French as a Second Language. , 1993 .

[25]  Jamal Abedi,et al.  Reliability and Validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment , 1996 .

[26]  P. Carrell,et al.  Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading , 1998 .