A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken.

We have identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) explaining a large proportion of the variation in body weights at different ages and growth between chronological ages in an F(2) intercross between red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens. QTL were mapped using forward selection for loci with significant marginal genetic effects and with a simultaneous search for epistatic QTL pairs. We found 22 significant loci contributing to these traits, nine of these were only found by the simultaneous two-dimensional search, which demonstrates the power of this approach for detecting loci affecting complex traits. We have also estimated the relative contribution of additive, dominance, and epistasis effects to growth and the contribution of epistasis was more pronounced prior to 46 days of age, whereas additive genetic effects explained the major portion of the genetic variance later in life. Several of the detected loci affected either early or late growth but not both. Very few loci affected the entire growth process, which points out that early and late growth, at least to some extent, have different genetic regulation.

[1]  S. Kerje,et al.  QTL Analysis of a Red Junglefowl × White Leghorn Intercross Reveals Trade-Off in Resource Allocation Between Behavior and Production Traits , 2002, Behavior genetics.

[2]  Ron Korstanje,et al.  From QTL to gene: the harvest begins , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[3]  L. Andersson,et al.  Use of randomization testing to detect multiple epistatic QTLs. , 2002, Genetical research.

[4]  Jonathan Flint,et al.  Finding the molecular basis of quatitative traits: successes and pitfalls , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[5]  G A Churchill,et al.  Genome-wide epistatic interaction analysis reveals complex genetic determinants of circadian behavior in mice. , 2001, Genome research.

[6]  Leif Andersson,et al.  Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[7]  R Jansen,et al.  Mapping epistatic quantitative trait loci with one-dimensional genome searches. , 2001, Genetics.

[8]  Trudy F. C. Mackay,et al.  Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  C. Haley,et al.  Single QTL effects, epistasis, and pleiotropy account for two-thirds of the phenotypic F(2) variance of growth and obesity in DU6i x DBA/2 mice. , 2000, Genome research.

[10]  B. Kinghorn,et al.  The use of a genetic algorithm for simultaneous mapping of multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. , 2000, Genetics.

[11]  Z B Zeng,et al.  Genetic architecture of a morphological shape difference between two Drosophila species. , 2000, Genetics.

[12]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Mapping quantitative trait loci for murine growth: a closer look at genetic architecture. , 1999, Genetical research.

[13]  Z. Zeng,et al.  Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci. , 1999, Genetics.

[14]  W Davies,et al.  Multiple marker mapping of quantitative trait loci in a cross between outbred wild boar and large white pigs. , 1998, Genetics.

[15]  W. Atchley,et al.  Developmental quantitative genetics, conditional epigenetic variability and growth in mice. , 1997, Genetics.

[16]  K. Chase,et al.  Epistat : a computer program for identifying and testing interactions between pairs of quantitative trait loci , 1997, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[17]  Ritsert C. Jansen,et al.  Complex interactions of new quantitative trait loci, Sluc1, Sluc2, Sluc3, and Sluc4, that influence the susceptibility to lung cancer in the mouse , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[18]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Quantitative trait loci for murine growth. , 1996, Genetics.

[19]  R. Doerge,et al.  Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. , 1994, Genetics.

[20]  C. Haley,et al.  Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares. , 1994, Genetics.

[21]  I. Nir,et al.  Comparative growth and development of the digestive organs and of some enzymes in broiler and egg type chicks after hatching. , 1993, British poultry science.

[22]  I. Nir,et al.  Growth and development of the digestive organs and some enzymes in broiler chicks after hatching. , 1991, British poultry science.

[23]  H. Marks,et al.  Changes in organ growth pattern associated with long-term selection for high growth rate in quail. , 1991, Growth, development, and aging : GDA.

[24]  P. Siegel,et al.  Allomorphic relationships from hatching to 56 days in parental lines and F1 crosses of chickens selected 27 generations for high or low body weight. , 1988, Growth, development, and aging : GDA.

[25]  H. Marks,et al.  Postnatal growth and organ development in Japanese quail selected for high growth rate. , 1985, Growth.

[26]  W. Atchley,et al.  A genetic analysis of targeted growth in mice. , 1984, Genetics.

[27]  Quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogeny. II. Genetic and environmental correlations among age-specific characters in randombred house mice. , 1984, Growth.

[28]  W. Atchley,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF DEVELOPMENT: GENETIC CORRELATIONS AMONG AGE‐SPECIFIC TRAIT VALUES AND THE EVOLUTION OF ONTOGENY , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  W. Atchley,et al.  Quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogeny: I. Ontogenetic changes in quantitative genetic variance components in randombred mice , 1983 .

[30]  C. Lilja.  A comparative study of postnatal growth and organ development in some species of birds. , 1983, Growth.

[31]  D. Falconer,et al.  Cell numbers and cell sizes in organs of mice selected for large and small body size. , 1978, Genetical research.

[32]  Cedric A. B. Smith,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics , 1960 .