Modeling Size Limitations of Resistive Crossbar Array With Cell Selectors

Due to recent developments in emerging memory technologies, resistive crossbar arrays have gained increasing importance. The size of the crossbar arrays is, however, limited due to challenges brought by the interconnect resistance, sneak path currents, and the physical area of the peripheral circuitry. In this paper, three figures of merit that characterize the limitations of resistive crossbar arrays with selectors are described, such as the driver resistance, voltage degradation across the cell, and read margin. The models, exhibiting good agreement with SPICE, are compared with different biasing schemes during both write and read operations. These models are also used to predict the device requirements of resistive crossbar arrays with selectors and to project parameter values, such as the nonlinearity factor, on-state resistance, and tolerable interconnect resistance per cell for large-scale crossbar arrays.

[1]  D. Stewart,et al.  The missing memristor found , 2008, Nature.

[2]  A. Hajimiri,et al.  A Breakdown Voltage Multiplier for High Voltage Swing Drivers , 2007, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[3]  Eby G. Friedman,et al.  Design models of resistive crossbar arrays with selector devices , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS).

[4]  Yi-Chou Chen,et al.  An access-transistor-free (0T/1R) non-volatile resistance random access memory (RRAM) using a novel threshold switching, self-rectifying chalcogenide device , 2003, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 2003.

[5]  Shimeng Yu,et al.  Impact of vertical RRAM device characteristics on 3D cross-point array design , 2014, 2014 IEEE 6th International Memory Workshop (IMW).

[6]  H. Hwang,et al.  High current density and nonlinearity combination of selection device based on TaO(x)/TiO2/TaO(x) structure for one selector-one resistor arrays. , 2012, ACS nano.

[7]  Rainer Waser,et al.  Design and analysis of future memories based on switchable resistive elements , 2006 .

[8]  P. Vontobel,et al.  Writing to and reading from a nano-scale crossbar memory based on memristors , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[9]  W. T. Lynch,et al.  Worst-Case Analysis of a Resistor Memory Matrix , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[10]  Charles A. David,et al.  High-Speed Fixed Memories Using Large-Scale Integrated Resistor Matrices , 1968, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[11]  Qing Luo,et al.  Cu BEOL compatible selector with high selectivity (>107), extremely low off-current (∼pA) and high endurance (>1010) , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM).

[12]  Guido Groeseneken,et al.  One-Selector One-Resistor Cross-Point Array With Threshold Switching Selector , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[13]  S. Simon Wong,et al.  Compact One-Transistor-N-RRAM Array Architecture for Advanced CMOS Technology , 2015, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[14]  T.G. Noll,et al.  Fundamental analysis of resistive nano-crossbars for the use in hybrid Nano/CMOS-memory , 2007, ESSCIRC 2007 - 33rd European Solid-State Circuits Conference.

[15]  Tuo-Hung Hou,et al.  Bipolar Nonlinear $\hbox{Ni/TiO}_{2}\hbox{/}\hbox{Ni}$ Selector for 1S1R Crossbar Array Applications , 2011, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[16]  An Chen,et al.  A Comprehensive Crossbar Array Model With Solutions for Line Resistance and Nonlinear Device Characteristics , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[17]  Tuo-Hung Hou,et al.  One selector-one resistor (1S1R) crossbar array for high-density flexible memory applications , 2011, 2011 International Electron Devices Meeting.

[18]  Jiale Liang,et al.  Cross-Point Memory Array Without Cell Selectors—Device Characteristics and Data Storage Pattern Dependencies , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.