Technological leadership and variety: A Data Envelopment Analysis for the French machinery industry

We investigate structure and structural change within the French machinery industry from 1984–1991 in order to detect the apparent technology leaders and to get an account of the technological variety within the sector. The theoretical background of the paper is found in modern approaches to the economics of innovation and technology, where the very nature of technological knowledge and the local character of technological change are seen as a fundamental reason for the use of different technologies and for the different performances of firms. We apply a procedure that allows us to take into account such different performances and variety, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). As one major result, we find several best-practice technologies as well as a measure of technical inefficiency, allowing us to classify firms with respect to their relative technical performance. Moreover, technology leaders can be assigned to specific “technology fields”. The change within and between these fields over time is investigated.

[1]  Ronald L. Moomaw,et al.  Productive Efficiency and Region , 1981 .

[2]  Tacit Collusion, Free Entry, and Welfare , 1985 .

[3]  M. Jones-Lee,et al.  X-Theory versus Management Discretion Theory , 1971 .

[4]  Moses Abramovitz,et al.  Thinking about Growth , 1989 .

[5]  Roger A. McCain.  COMPETITION, INFORMATION, REDUNDANCY: X-EFFICIENCY AND THE CYBERNETICS OF THE FIRM , 1975 .

[6]  B. Carlsson.  THE MEASUREMENT OF EFFICIENCY IN PRODUCTION: AN APPLICATION TO SWEDISH MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES 1968 , 1972 .

[7]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Produktion öffentlicher Leistungen Effizienz und technischer Fortschritt/ Production in Public Enterprises Efficiency and Technical Progress , 1991 .

[8]  Gerald Silverberg,et al.  Adoption and diffusion of technology as a collective evolutionary process , 1991 .

[9]  H. A. John Green,et al.  Aggregation in Economic Analysis , 2015 .

[10]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[11]  William Fellner,et al.  Two Propositions in the Theory of Induced Innovations , 1961 .

[12]  George Kozmetsky,et al.  DEA of financial statements data: The U.S. computer industry , 1994 .

[13]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[14]  P. David,et al.  Technical choice innovation and economic growth , 1975 .

[15]  Ronald L. Moomaw,et al.  Firm location and city size: Reduced productivity advantages as a factor in the decline of manufacturing in urban areas , 1985 .

[16]  Syed Ahmad,et al.  On the Theory of Induced Invention , 1966 .

[17]  J. Kendrick.  Productivity Trends: Capital and Labor , 1956 .

[18]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[19]  D. Bös.  Introduction: Recent theories on public enterprise economies , 1988 .

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[21]  W. E. G. Salter,et al.  Productivity and Technical Change. , 1961 .

[22]  C. Freeman,et al.  New Explorations in the Economics of Technological Change , 1990 .

[23]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[24]  F. Førsund,et al.  Banking efficiency in the Nordic countries , 1993 .

[25]  Sten Thore,et al.  Economies of scale in the US computer industry: An empirical investigation using data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[26]  Wassily Leontief,et al.  Introduction to a Theory of the Internal Structure of Functional Relationships , 1947 .

[27]  Luc Soete,et al.  The economics of technical change and international trade , 1994 .

[28]  R. Caves,et al.  Competitive Conditions and the Firm's Buffer Stocks: An Exploratory Analysis , 1979 .

[29]  H. Leibenstein.  Individual Behavior and Economic Outcome. (Book Reviews: Beyond Economic Man. A New Foundation for Microeconomics) , 1976 .

[30]  A. Atkinson,et al.  A New View of Technological Change , 1969 .

[31]  Kuo-Ping Chang,et al.  Linear production functions and the data envelopment analysis , 1991 .

[32]  J. Geanakoplos,et al.  Free Entry and Social Inefficiency , 1986 .

[33]  R. Caves,et al.  Efficiency in U.S. manufacturing industries , 1990 .