General Action and Inaction Goals

Since the 1970s, researchers on motivation and behavior have taken the stance that important human behaviors are determined by specific attitudes, intentions, and goals. In the present article, we review evidence suggesting that, in addition to specific motivational constructs, general goals of action and inaction are also vital determinants of many important human behaviors. This research examines the effects of these goals on motor behavior, cognitive performance, and political participation. Furthermore, we connect these general action and inaction goals with other important areas in psychology, including affect, approach/avoidance, energization, material resources, mindsets, and power. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of individual and regional/cultural differences in action and inaction. Overall, general goals for action and inaction are shown to influence a vast array of important behaviors, suggesting that in addition to considering specific attitudes, intentions, and goals, researchers may gain important insight into human behavior by considering general motivations.

[1]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences. , 2011 .

[2]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.324 Power, optimism, and risk-taking , 2022 .

[3]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action , 1999 .

[4]  G. Gendolla,et al.  The Implicit “Go” , 2010, Psychological science.

[5]  T. Bouchard,et al.  Genes, environment, and personality. , 1994, Science.

[6]  J. Jost,et al.  Legitimacy Crisis? Behavioral Approach and Inhibition When Power Differences are Left Unexplained , 2008 .

[7]  Ian M. Handley,et al.  Participating in Politics Resembles Physical Activity , 2011, Psychological science.

[8]  S. Hewa Medical technology: A pandora's box? , 1994, The Journal of medical humanities.

[9]  D. Albarracín,et al.  Naïve Definitions of Action and Inaction: The Continuum, Spread, and Valence of Behaviors. , 2012, European journal of social psychology.

[10]  J. Bargh,et al.  The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Jeffrey Sanchez-Burks,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Protestant Relational Ideology and ( In ) Attention to Relational Cues in Work Settings , 2002 .

[12]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[13]  Juliano Laran The influence of information processing goal pursuit on postdecision affect and behavioral intentions. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Brehm,et al.  The intensity of motivation. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[16]  D. Albarracín,et al.  Immediate Increase in Food Intake Following Exercise Messages , 2009, Obesity.

[17]  I. Ajzen,et al.  The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior , 2005 .

[18]  Ian M. Handley,et al.  Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: a model of general action and inaction goals. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  R. Levine,et al.  The Pace of Life in 31 Countries , 1999 .

[20]  A. Caspi,et al.  Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Ruud Custers,et al.  The nonconscious cessation of goal pursuit: when goals and negative affect are coactivated. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  C. Carver,et al.  Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales , 1994 .

[23]  J. Montserrat,et al.  Association between habitual naps and sleep apnea. , 2006, Sleep.