In vivo performance evaluation of the Achilles Insight QUS device.

Achilles plus (GE, Lunar) has been widely used worldwide for more than a decade, and for its precision, ability to predict fragility fractures and comparability to central DXA, it can be considered a reference standard among quantitative ultrasound devices. As a water-bath system, Achilles plus has obvious practical drawbacks. Achilles Insight is a new-generation device that gives ultrasound parameters in less than 1 min, providing real-time imaging of the os calcis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of Achilles Insight in comparison to Achilles plus. The precision showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.5 and 0.4%, 4.1 and 3.0%, 2.7 and 2.1%, respectively, for speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and Stiffness obtained with Achilles plus and Achilles Insight. We also studied 117 postmenopausal women (mean age: 67.1+/-8.8 yr), 47 with and 70 without fragility fractures. Ultrasound parameters obtained by the two devices significantly (p<0.001) correlated and resulted in agreement according to the Bland and Altman method. Achilles plus and Achilles Insight showed similar values of areas under receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves in discriminating patients with or without fractures (0.884, 0.82, and 0.879 for SOS, BUA, and Stiffness, respectively, with Achilles plus, and 0.882, 0.828, and 0.889, respectively, for Achilles Insight). In conclusion, the better precision of the Achilles Insight with respect to Achilles plus could be explained by the fact that the measurement with Achilles Insight needs less time and gives a consequent reduction in motion artifacts. The high correlation and the similar ability to identify postmenopausal women with vertebral fracture suggest the possibility of using the database of Achilles plus for Achilles Insight.

[1]  B. Lees,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of a new ultrasound bone densitometer , 1993, Calcified Tissue International.

[2]  G M Owen,et al.  Factors affecting the in vivo precision of broad-band ultrasonic attenuation. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  D. Reid,et al.  Prediction of fractures in perimenopausal women: a comparison of dual energy x ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation. , 1996, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  J. Cauley,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1997, Archives of Internal Medicine.

[5]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Is Quantitative Ultrasound Dependent on Bone Structure? A Reflection , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  N. Pocock,et al.  Temperature Dependency of Quantitative Ultrasound , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  S. B. Palmer,et al.  Prediction of hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective study. , 1990, BMJ.

[9]  R. Eastell,et al.  Comparison of Two Methods for Measuring Ultrasound Properties of the Heel in Postmenopausal Women , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  C. M. Langton,et al.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[11]  P. Ross,et al.  Prediction of Fracture Risk by Radiographic Absorptiometry and Quantitative Ultrasound: A Prospective Study , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.

[12]  J. Hanley,et al.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. , 1983, Radiology.

[13]  Reinhard Barkmann,et al.  Association of Five Quantitative Ultrasound Devices and Bone Densitometry With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Population‐Based Sample: The OPUS Study , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  Robert Luben,et al.  Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study , 2004, The Lancet.

[15]  M. Bicocchi,et al.  Three-year longitudinal study with quantitative ultrasound at the hand phalanx in a female population , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Comparison of Three Bone Ultrasounds for the Discrimination of Subjects With and Without Osteoporotic Fractures Among 7562 Elderly Women , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  R. Recker,et al.  Ultrasound velocity through bone predicts incident vertebral deformity , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[18]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. , 1997, Archives of internal medicine.

[19]  C. Glüer,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Techniques for the Assessment of Osteoporosis: Expert Agreement on Current Status , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  E. Orwoll,et al.  Precision and Discriminatory Ability of Calcaneal Bone Assessment Technologies , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[21]  S. Gonnelli,et al.  The use of ultrasound in the assessment of bone status , 2002, Journal of endocrinological investigation.

[22]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Comparison of Six Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound Devices: Precision and Hip Fracture Discrimination , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  G. Breart,et al.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.

[24]  S. Gnudi,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound and Bone Densitometry to Evaluate the Risk of Nonspine Fractures: A Prospective Study , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[26]  P W Thompson,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel predicts wrist and osteoporosis-related fractures in women age 45-75 years. , 1998, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[27]  A. Kriska,et al.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: A review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk , 2005, Osteoporosis International.