IN.PACT SFA Clinical Study Using the IN.PACT Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon in a Chinese Patient Population

Purpose: To confirm the safety and effectiveness of the IN.PACT Admiral drug-coated balloon (DCB) as a treatment for de novo and native artery restenotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery in Chinese subjects. Materials and Methods: IN.PACT SFA China (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02118532) was a single-arm, independently adjudicated, prospective, premarket study that enrolled 143 subjects (mean age 66.8±7.7 years; 107 men) at 15 centers. The predominant risk factors were hypertension (104, 72.7%) and diabetes mellitus (66, 46.2%). The majority of subjects were classified as Rutherford category 2 or 3 [69 (48.3%) and 55 (38.5%), respectively]; 19 (13.3%) subjects had critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category 4). The mean lesion length was 10.4±6.51 cm; more than half of the lesions (75, 52.4%) were chronic total occlusions. Calcification was found in 66 (46.2%) lesions. Outcomes at 12 months were compared with DCB safety and effectiveness performance goals derived from the literature. The 30-day primary safety outcome was a composite of freedom from device- and procedure-related mortality, major target limb amputation, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). Results: The primary safety outcome was 99.3% at 30 days. Follow-up compliance at 12 months was 92.6%. Estimated 1-year primary patency using Kaplan-Meier analysis was 90.9% and freedom from CD-TLR was 97.1%. The rate of CD-TLR at 12 months was 2.9%. The Rutherford category status improved significantly (p<0.001) between baseline and 12 months. Conclusion: Results from IN.PACT SFA China demonstrated high rates of patency and low rates of CD-TLR in Chinese subjects through 12 months despite patient and lesion complexity. These data are consistent with the results of other IN.PACT DCB trials.

[1]  S. Saito,et al.  Drug‐coated balloon versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery: 2‐year results of the MDT‐2113 SFA Japan randomized trial , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  Xin Jia,et al.  Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons in the Treatment of 200 Chinese Patients With Severe Femoropopliteal Lesions: 24-Month Results of AcoArt I. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  Hong Wang,et al.  Drug-Coated Balloon vs Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: One-Year Results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan Randomized Trial , 2017, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[4]  F. Vermassen,et al.  Stellarex drug‐coated balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal arterial disease—The ILLUMENATE Global Study: 12‐Month results from a prospective, multicenter, single‐arm study , 2017, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  P. Faries,et al.  Stellarex Drug-Coated Balloon for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Disease , 2017, Circulation.

[6]  C. Paetzel,et al.  The 24-Month Results of the Lutonix Global SFA Registry: Worldwide Experience With Lutonix Drug-Coated Balloon. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  D. Scheinert,et al.  Six-Month Results From the Initial Randomized Study of the Ranger Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in the Femoropopliteal Segment , 2017, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[8]  M. Jaff,et al.  Low-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease , 2017, Circulation.

[9]  W. Guo,et al.  Acotec Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter: Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Clinical Study in Femoropopliteal Arteries: Evidence From the AcoArt I Trial. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  Hong Wang,et al.  Durability of Treatment Effect Using a Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 24-Month Results of IN.PACT SFA. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  D. Scheinert,et al.  Trial of a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  D. Scheinert,et al.  Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Peripheral Artery Disease , 2015, Circulation.

[13]  D. Scheinert,et al.  Paclitaxel-Releasing Balloon in Femoropopliteal Lesions Using a BTHC Excipient , 2015, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[14]  C. Qiu,et al.  Cardiovascular Risk Factor Profiles for Peripheral Artery Disease and Carotid Atherosclerosis among Chinese Older People: A Population-Based Study , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  Igor Rudan,et al.  Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis , 2013, The Lancet.

[16]  T. Albrecht,et al.  Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons Reduce Restenosis After Femoro-Popliteal Angioplasty: Evidence From the Randomized PACIFIER Trial , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  D. Hu,et al.  Prevalence of Low Ankle Brachial Index and Its Association With Pulse Pressure in an Elderly Chinese Population: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2012, Journal of epidemiology.

[18]  F. Castriota,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal arterial disease: 12-month results from a multicenter Italian registry. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[19]  M. Dake,et al.  Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Show Superiority to Balloon Angioplasty and Bare Metal Stents in Femoropopliteal Disease: Twelve-Month Zilver PTX Randomized Study Results , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[20]  Y. Xu,et al.  Characteristics of prevalence in peripheral arterial disease and correlative risk factors and comorbidities among female natural population in China. , 2010, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[21]  Maurice Buchbinder,et al.  Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery: Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[22]  Johannes Lammer,et al.  Balloon angioplasty versus stenting with nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial femoral artery lesions , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[23]  C. Claussen,et al.  Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  D. Scheinert,et al.  Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions up to 10 cm in Length: The Femoral Artery Stenting Trial (FAST) , 2007, Circulation.

[25]  Johannes Lammer,et al.  Sustained Benefit at 2 Years of Primary Femoropopliteal Stenting Compared With Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Stenting , 2007, Circulation.

[26]  D. Bloch,et al.  Performance goals and endpoint assessments for clinical trials of femoropopliteal bare nitinol stents in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[27]  F. Hu,et al.  Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease and its association with smoking in a population-based study in Beijing, China. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  Johannes Lammer,et al.  Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  Martin Schillinger,et al.  Long-Segment SFA Stenting—The Dark Sides: In-Stent Restenosis, Clinical Deterioration, and Stent Fractures , 2005, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[30]  Christopher Piorkowski,et al.  Prevalence and clinical impact of stent fractures after femoropopliteal stenting. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  J. Lasala,et al.  Coronary artery dissection and perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2004, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[32]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  The effectiveness of antihistamines in reducing the severity of runny nose and sneezing: A meta‐analysis * , 1998, Clinical pharmacology and therapy.

[33]  R. D'Agostino,et al.  Meta‐analysis: A method for synthesizing research , 1995, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[34]  C. Claussen,et al.  Angioplasty of femoral-popliteal arteries with drug-coated balloons: 5-year follow-up of the THUNDER trial. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[35]  Karl F. Scheibner,et al.  for Use i , 1996 .