Design of the optimal feeding policy in an assembly system

This paper describes an innovative and integrated approach to component management optimization within a production/assembly system. In a mixed-models assembly process the handling of parts and components for each work station represents a substantial variable that can greatly affect job duration and efficiency. This paper is strictly related to Assembly to Order/Manufacturing to Order (ATO and MTO) systems, where lead time has to be very short and flexibility is at its maximum level. In Assembly to Order (ATO) or Make to Order (MTO) systems, the production is increasingly getting more customized in response to the demand, thanks to the progresses reached in both manufacturing and information technologies. It is becoming increasingly possible to assemble or make products specifically in response to the requests of either end customers or retailers. As a consequence of such customization, the design of the whole system must take into direct account several elements: parts warehouses location, feeding policies and feeding systems. In some cases the collection of parts and components required picking activities, in other the movement of entire units load. In several instances experts have analyzed the problems about material centralization/decentralization, storage policies and assembly feeding problem in different and independent ways, while the problem needs an integrated approach. While many researches regarding components allocation problems in ATO and MTO systems, did not consider feeding policies, material picking, packing activities and vehicles optimization, this paper cover focuses on filling such gap using an integrated framework that considers both aspects of the problem: the centralization/decentralization of components in order to minimize the total storage costs and the right feeding policies. Feeding problems in assembly lines are some of the most important aspects to consider during the analysis and design of an assembly system, to allow the maximization of efficiency and flexibility. To reach such goals, a multi-factorial analysis has been carried out during this experiment and will validate the introduced framework. An industrial application of the introduced framework is illustrated to explain its real significant production implication.

[1]  Jihong Ou,et al.  Coordination of stocking decisions in an assemble-to-order environment , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Asoo J. Vakharia,et al.  Outsourcing inventory management decisions in healthcare: Models and application , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  A. Kurtoglu Flexibility analysis of two assembly lines , 2004 .

[4]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Managing Inventory and Supply Performance in Assembly Systems with Random Supply Capacity and Demand , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Lars Medbo Assembly work execution and materials kit functionality in parallel flow assembly systems , 2003 .

[6]  Daria Battini,et al.  Optimal safety stock levels of subassemblies and manufacturing components , 2007 .

[7]  Jie Wei,et al.  Inventory Management in Assemble-to-Order System with Two Correlated Products , 2006, 2006 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[8]  Mark S. Hillier The costs and benefits of commonality in assemble-to-order systems with a (Q, r)-policy for component replenishment , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Susan H. Xu,et al.  Joint Inventory Replenishment and Component Allocation Optimization in an Assemble-to-Order System , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Maurício C. de Souza,et al.  Packing items to feed assembly lines , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Monica Bellgran,et al.  A method for the design of flexible assembly systems , 1995 .

[12]  Tsung-Hui Chen,et al.  Optimizing Supply Chain Collaboration Based on Joint Replenishment and Channel Coordination , 2005 .

[13]  Mauro Gamberi,et al.  Design of a class based storage picker to product order picking system , 2007 .

[14]  Erhan Kozan An integrated material handling system for a truck assembly plant , 2000, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Gino Marchet,et al.  Routing policies and COI-based storage policies in picker-to-part systems , 1998 .

[16]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  Inventory, transportation, service quality and the location of distribution centers , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  F. Fred Choobineh,et al.  The impact of component commonality in an assemble-to-order environment under supply and demand uncertainty , 2005 .

[18]  Vernon Ning Hsu,et al.  Managing components for assemble‐to‐order products with lead‐time‐dependent pricing: The full‐shipment model , 2007 .

[19]  Mark S. Hillier Component commonality in multiple-period, assemble-to-order systems , 2000 .

[20]  Wonjoon Choi,et al.  A dynamic part-feeding system for an automotive assembly line , 2002 .

[21]  G. D. Eppen Note---Effects of Centralization on Expected Costs in a Multi-Location Newsboy Problem , 1979 .

[22]  M. Baumeister,et al.  Synchronisation of material flow and assembly in hybrid and modular systems , 2001 .

[23]  W. Zinn,et al.  MEASURING THE EFFECT OF INVENTORY CENTRALIZATION DECENTRALIZATION ON AGGREGATE SAFETY STOCK : THE "SQUARE ROOT LAW" REVISITED , 1989 .

[24]  P. T. Evers EXPANDING THE SQUARE ROOT LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF BOTH SAFETY AND CYCLE STOCKS , 1995 .

[25]  A. Stulman Benefits of Centralized Stocking for the Multi-Centre Newsboy Problem with First Come, First Served Allocation , 1987 .