An Integrated Neuroscience and Engineering Approach to Classifying Human Brain-States

Abstract : Harnessing the capability to read and classify brainwaves into the myriad of possible human cognitive states (referred to as brain-states) has been a long-standing engineering challenge. Brain signals are generally captured non-invasively by electroencephalography (EEG) a cheapand portable brain imaging tool with time resolution fine enough to track the dynamic changes of different brain-states. While the scientific quest to map human brain function has exploded in the last two decades, the ability to link patterns in EEG signals to specific cognitive states remains elusive, owing perhaps to limited crosstalk between the fields of neuroscience and engineering. Here, we report a framework we developed that leverages the latest neuroscience knowledge to transform the current engineering approach to brain-state classification. We used inverse imaging techniques and surface-based spatial normalization algorithms to interpret brain signals across a large pool of subjects and cross-validated our findings with simulated and actual brain data. We concluded that decoding brain signals in the brain (a.k.a. source-space approach) confers two major benefits compared to classifying brain signals directly on the EEG sensor readings (a.k.a. sensor-space approach): i) it provides a principled method to transfer data from one subject to another, thereby reducing BCI calibration time; and ii) it increases classification accuracy regardless of which dimensionality-reduction techniques were used to preprocess the data. Overall, this innovative approach establishes a formal integrated neuroengineering framework that allows us to capitalize on the similarity in brain function across subjects (a traditional neuroscience approach) and optimally incorporate a priori information to maximize classification algorithm performance at an individual level (a traditional engineering goal) that ultimately improves our ability to classify human brain-states.

[1]  A. Dale,et al.  Improved Localizadon of Cortical Activity by Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction: A Linear Approach , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J.J. Vidal,et al.  Real-time detection of brain events in EEG , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  C. Rosazza,et al.  Resting-state brain networks: literature review and clinical applications , 2011, Neurological Sciences.

[4]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[5]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[6]  Sylvain Baillet The Dowser in the Fields: Searching for MEG Sources , 2010 .

[7]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Electromagnetic brain mapping , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[8]  John C. Mosher,et al.  Anatomically and Functionally Constrained Minimum-Norm Estimates , 2010 .

[9]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[10]  Eric Larson,et al.  Switching auditory attention using spatial and non-spatial features recruits different cortical networks , 2014, NeuroImage.

[11]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[12]  ROBERT M. CHAPMAN,et al.  Evoked Responses to Numerical and Non-Numerical Visual Stimuli while Problem Solving , 1964, Nature.

[13]  D J McFarland,et al.  An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  J J Vidal,et al.  Toward direct brain-computer communication. , 1973, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[15]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Evaluation of event-related desynchronization (ERD) preceding and following voluntary self-paced movement. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[19]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[20]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A brief history of the resting state: The Washington University perspective , 2012, NeuroImage.

[21]  Eric Larson,et al.  Leveraging anatomical information to improve transfer learning in brain–computer interfaces , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.