Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Crop pollination by bees and other animals is an essential ecosystem service. Ensuring the maintenance of the service requires a full understanding of the contributions of landscape elements to pollinator populations and crop pollination. Here, the first quantitative model that predicts pollinator abundance on a landscape is described and tested. METHODS Using information on pollinator nesting resources, floral resources and foraging distances, the model predicts the relative abundance of pollinators within nesting habitats. From these nesting areas, it then predicts relative abundances of pollinators on the farms requiring pollination services. Model outputs are compared with data from coffee in Costa Rica, watermelon and sunflower in California and watermelon in New Jersey-Pennsylvania (NJPA). KEY RESULTS Results from Costa Rica and California, comparing field estimates of pollinator abundance, richness or services with model estimates, are encouraging, explaining up to 80 % of variance among farms. However, the model did not predict observed pollinator abundances on NJPA, so continued model improvement and testing are necessary. The inability of the model to predict pollinator abundances in the NJPA landscape may be due to not accounting for fine-scale floral and nesting resources within the landscapes surrounding farms, rather than the logic of our model. CONCLUSIONS The importance of fine-scale resources for pollinator service delivery was supported by sensitivity analyses indicating that the model's predictions depend largely on estimates of nesting and floral resources within crops. Despite the need for more research at the finer-scale, the approach fills an important gap by providing quantitative and mechanistic model from which to evaluate policy decisions and develop land-use plans that promote pollination conservation and service delivery.

[1]  J. Dushoff,et al.  Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[2]  Sarah S. Greenleaf,et al.  Wild bee species increase tomato production and respond differently to surrounding land use in Northern California , 2006 .

[3]  C. Kremen,et al.  Are ecosystem services stabilized by differences among species? A test using crop pollination , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Jonathan Dushoff,et al.  Testing Simple Indices of Habitat Proximity , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Pat Willmer,et al.  LINKING BEES AND FLOWERS: HOW DO FLORAL COMMUNITIES STRUCTURE POLLINATOR COMMUNITIES? , 2003 .

[6]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns , 2008 .

[8]  N. Williams,et al.  Resource distributions among habitats determine solitary bee offspring production in a mosaic landscape. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  Erik Stokstad,et al.  The Case of the Empty Hives , 2007, Science.

[10]  N. Williams,et al.  Effects of Cultivation and Proximity to Natural Habitat on Ground-nesting Native Bees in California Sunflower Fields , 2006 .

[11]  H. Wiering The bees of the world , 2000 .

[12]  Matthias Albrecht,et al.  The Swiss agri-environment scheme enhances pollinator diversity and plant reproductive success in nearby intensively managed farmland , 2007 .

[13]  Scott Ferson,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for models of population viability , 1995 .

[14]  E. A. Clark,et al.  Insect pollinators and sustainable agriculture , 1990 .

[15]  Robin Gregory,et al.  Some Pitfalls of an Overemphasis on Science in Environmental Risk Management Decisions , 2006 .

[16]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  On the uses of expert judgment on complex technical problems , 1989 .

[17]  G. Daily,et al.  The effects of forest fragmentation on bee communities in tropical countryside , 2007 .

[18]  Achim Gathmann,et al.  Foraging ranges of solitary bees , 2002 .

[19]  Paul C. Cross,et al.  Using Logistic Regression to Analyze the Sensitivity of PVA Models: a Comparison of Methods Based on African Wild Dog Models , 2001 .

[20]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California , 2004 .

[21]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[23]  S. Polasky,et al.  CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES , 2005 .

[24]  A. Klein,et al.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  N. Williams,et al.  NATIVE BEES, NATIVE PLANTS, AND CROP POLLINATION IN CALIFORNIA , 2002 .

[26]  T. Ricketts Tropical Forest Fragments Enhance Pollinator Activity in Nearby Coffee Crops , 2004 .

[27]  R. Chaplin-Kramer,et al.  Insects as providers of ecosystem services: crop pollination and pest control. , 2007 .

[28]  Alfons Buekens,et al.  Book Review: Assessment of the Performance of Engineered Waste Containment Barriers by National Research Council of the National Academies , 2010 .

[29]  H. Hines,et al.  Bumble Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Diversity and Abundance in Tallgrass Prairie Patches: Effects of Local and Landscape Floral Resources , 2005 .

[30]  F. Herzog,et al.  Indirect effects of grassland extensification schemes on pollinators in two contrasting European countries , 2007 .

[31]  Kaplan,et al.  ‘Combining Probability Distributions from Experts in Risk Analysis’ , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  M. Aizen,et al.  Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[33]  S. Potts,et al.  Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape , 2005 .

[34]  V. Tepedino,et al.  Diversity and competition in bee-plant communities on short-grass prairie , 1981 .

[35]  Hannah R. Gaines,et al.  Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land‐use gradients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA , 2007 .

[36]  J. Osborne,et al.  An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[37]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  D. Janzen Costa Rican natural history , 1984 .

[39]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  James Regetz,et al.  Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? , 2008, Ecology letters.

[41]  C. Kremen Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? , 2005, Ecology letters.

[42]  Mark L. Winston,et al.  Pollinators provide economic incentive to preserve natural land in agroecosystems , 2006 .

[43]  S. E. C R E S S W E L L,et al.  An Economic Model of the Limits to Foraging Range in Central Place Foragers with Numerical Solutions for Bumblebees , 2022 .

[44]  Sarah S. Greenleaf,et al.  Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size , 2007, Oecologia.