Attitude control for tethered towing debris under actuators and dynamics uncertainty

Abstract Tethered towing is regarded as a promising debris removal technology to decrease the population of space debris. Owing to the debris rotation, the debris and tether are vulnerable to entanglement in the towing process. After capture, the untight capture leads to relative motion between gripper and debris and changes the actuator configuration matrix inevitably. Thus, except the traditional dynamics uncertainties, it is also necessary to consider the control allocation of multi-actuators under the nonnegative unilateral magnitude constraint and configuration matrix uncertainty. To tackle these problems, a novel scheme was proposed to stabilize the attitude of debris using adaptive backstepping control with robust allocation technique. Specifically, the adaptive attitude stabilization law is designed to generate control torques in the presence of dynamics uncertainties. A robust control allocation algorithm is developed to distribute the three axis torques to redundant actuators, in which the optimal control vector of actuator is obtained by interior-point method, under the actuator configuration matrix uncertainty and saturation constraints. Finally, numerical simulation results are employed to validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

[1]  Jianzhong Qiao,et al.  Anti-disturbance attitude control of combined spacecraft with enhanced control allocation scheme , 2018, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics.

[2]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods , 2016 .

[3]  Yuanqing Xia,et al.  Adaptive finite‐time attitude stabilization for rigid spacecraft with actuator faults and saturation constraints , 2016 .

[5]  Panfeng Huang,et al.  Finite time attitude takeover control for combination via tethered space robot , 2017 .

[6]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Reconfigurable spacecraft attitude takeover control in post-capture of target by space manipulators , 2016, J. Frankl. Inst..

[7]  Christophe Bonnal,et al.  Active debris removal: Recent progress and current trends , 2013 .

[8]  Zhijun Cai,et al.  A sufficiently smooth projection operator , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Sliding Mode Fault Tolerant Attitude Tracking Control for Flexible Spacecraft Under Actuator Saturation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[10]  Antonios Tsourdos,et al.  Attitude control analysis of tethered de-orbiting , 2018 .

[11]  Qinglei Hu,et al.  Spacecraft Attitude Fault-Tolerant Control Based on Iterative Learning Observer and Control Allocation , 2018, Control Allocation for Spacecraft Under Actuator Faults.

[12]  Ou Ma,et al.  A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing , 2014 .

[13]  Jianping Yuan,et al.  Robust inertia-free attitude takeover control of postcapture combined spacecraft with guaranteed prescribed performance. , 2018, ISA transactions.

[14]  David G. Luenberger,et al.  Linear and nonlinear programming , 1984 .

[15]  Panfeng Huang,et al.  Coordinated stabilization of tumbling targets using tethered space manipulators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[16]  Panfeng Huang,et al.  Attitude control of towed space debris using only tether , 2017 .

[17]  Peng Shi,et al.  Neural-Network-Based Adaptive Backstepping Control With Application to Spacecraft Attitude Regulation , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[18]  Rui Qi,et al.  Dynamics and offset control of tethered space-tug system , 2018 .

[19]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  Deployment dynamics of tethered-net for space debris removal , 2017 .

[20]  Bo Li,et al.  Velocity-free fault-tolerant control allocation for flexible spacecraft with redundant thrusters , 2015, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[21]  Nicholas L. Johnson,et al.  Orbital Debris: the Growing Threat to Space Operations , 2010 .

[22]  Panfeng Huang,et al.  Adaptive control for space debris removal with uncertain kinematics, dynamics and states , 2016 .

[23]  Shijie Zhang,et al.  Robust Control Allocation among Overactuated Spacecraft Thrusters under Ellipsoidal Uncertainty , 2014 .

[24]  Panfeng Huang,et al.  Adaptive attitude takeover control for noncooperative targets using robust allocation , 2018, 2018 33rd Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation (YAC).

[25]  Vladimir S. Aslanov,et al.  Dynamics of large space debris removal using tethered space tug , 2013 .

[26]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Postcapture Backstepping Control for Tumbling Tethered Space Robot–Target Combination , 2016 .

[27]  Danwei Wang,et al.  Robust Control Allocation for Spacecraft Attitude Tracking Under Actuator Faults , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[28]  Bo Li,et al.  Robust finite-time control allocation in spacecraft attitude stabilization under actuator misalignment , 2013 .

[29]  Paolo Gasbarri,et al.  Elastic issues and vibration reduction in a tethered deorbiting mission , 2016 .

[30]  Juntong Qi,et al.  Null‐space‐based optimal control reallocation for spacecraft stabilization under input saturation , 2015 .

[31]  Steve Ulrich,et al.  Postcapture Dynamics and Experimental Validation of Subtethered Space Debris , 2017 .

[32]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  On-line parameter adaptation for a momentum control in the post-grasping of a tumbling target with model uncertainty , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[33]  Hai Huang,et al.  Librational characteristics of a dumbbell modeled tethered satellite under small, continuous, constant thrust , 2013 .