The Relationship Between Line Manager Behavior, Perceived HRM Practices, and Individual Performance: Examining the Mediating Role of Engagement

This article examines the role played by line managers in the link between HRM practices and individual performance outcomes. Drawing on social exchange theory, the authors test a mediated model linking perceived line manager behavior and perceived human resource management practices with employee engagement and individual performance. The study focuses on two self-report measures of individual performance; task performance and innovative work behavior. Two studies with a total of 1,796 participants were conducted in service-sector organizations in the United Kingdom and analyzed using structural equation modeling. The data reveal that perceived line manager behavior and perceived HRM practices are linked with employee engagement. In turn, employee engagement is strongly linked to individual performance and fully mediates the link between both perceived HRM practices and perceived line manager behavior and self-report task performance (study 1), as well as self-report innovative work behavior (study 2). The findings show the significance of the line manager in the HRM-performance link, and the mediating role played by employee engagement. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  D. Robinson,et al.  The drivers of employee engagement , 2004 .

[2]  Fiona Davies,et al.  Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of hrm practice on employee outcomes , 2005 .

[3]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Nancy P. Rothbard,et al.  Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles , 2001 .

[5]  Y. Baruch,et al.  Alternative Models for Antecedents and Outcomes of Work Centrality and Job Satisfaction of High-Tech Personnel , 1997 .

[6]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  Job Satisfaction and the Good Soldier: The Relationship Between Affect and Employee “Citizenship” , 1983 .

[7]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[8]  M. Taylor,et al.  Aren't there two parties in an employment relationship? Antecedents and consequences of organization–employee agreement on contract obligations and violations , 2003 .

[9]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[10]  Sue Hutchinson,et al.  Front‐line managers as agents in the HRM‐performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence , 2007 .

[11]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[12]  Catherine Truss,et al.  Complexities and Controversies in Linking HRM with Organizational Outcomes , 2001 .

[13]  D. Guest.  Human Resource Management, Corporate Performance and Employee Wellbeing: Building the Worker into HRM , 2002 .

[14]  Sze-Sze Wong,et al.  A Tale of Passion: Linking Job Passion and Cognitive Engagement to Employee Work Performance , 2010 .

[15]  Bruce A. Rayton,et al.  Satisfaction with HR practices and commitment to the organisation: why one size does not fit all , 2005 .

[16]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[17]  C. Wildermuth,et al.  A perfect match: decoding employee engagement – Part I: Engaging cultures and leaders , 2008 .

[18]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[19]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, The , 2007 .

[20]  Anastasia A. Katou,et al.  HRM and firm performance , 2014 .

[21]  J. Gould-Williams.  HR practices, organizational climate and employee outcomes: evaluating social exchange relationships in local government , 2007 .

[22]  B. Schneider,et al.  The Meaning of Employee Engagement , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[23]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Human resource practices: Administrative contract makers , 1994 .

[24]  S. Parker,et al.  Is Behavioral Engagement a Distinct and Useful Construct? , 2008, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[25]  Kathy Monks,et al.  HR practices and commitment to change: an employee‐level analysis , 2007 .

[26]  Fiona Edgar,et al.  HRM practice and employee attitudes: different measures – different results , 2005 .

[27]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[28]  Jacqueline A-M. Coyle-Shapiro,et al.  The employment relationship : examining psychological and contextual perspectives , 2004 .

[29]  G. R. J. Hockey.  Work environments and performance. , 2000 .

[30]  Craig R. Taylor,et al.  The Race for Talent: Retaining and Engaging Workers in the 21st Century , 2004 .

[31]  J. Cook,et al.  New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non‐fulfilment , 1980 .

[32]  John J. Haggerty,et al.  Missing Variables in Theories of Strategic Human Resource Management: Time, Cause, and Individuals , 2005 .

[33]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  J. Gould-Williams.  The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: A study of public-sector organizations , 2003 .

[35]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[36]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[37]  Anthony R. Wheeler,et al.  The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave , 2008 .

[38]  T. Judge,et al.  The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction , 2004 .

[40]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[41]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[42]  Xiaoyun Wang,et al.  ‘Intended’ and ‘implemented’ HRM: the missing linchpin in strategic human resource management research , 2006 .

[43]  E. Soane,et al.  Development and application of a new measure of employee engagement: the ISA Engagement Scale , 2012 .

[44]  S. Sonnentag.  Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  J. H. Davis,et al.  The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .

[46]  E. Conway,et al.  Unravelling the complexities of high commitment: an employee‐level analysis , 2009 .

[47]  E. Conway,et al.  Relating career stage to attitudes towards HR practices and commitment: Evidence of interaction effects? , 2004 .

[48]  P. Bentler,et al.  Evaluating model fit. , 1995 .

[49]  James Guthrie,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: DOES INDUSTRY MATTER? , 2005 .

[50]  D. D. Hartog,et al.  Performance management: A model and research agenda , 2004 .

[51]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[52]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[54]  Michael Christian,et al.  WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE , 2011 .

[55]  David P. Lepak,et al.  EMPLOYEE ATTRIBUTIONS OF THE “WHY” OF HR PRACTICES: THEIR EFFECTS ON EMPLOYEE ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIORS, AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION , 2008 .

[56]  S. Donaldson,et al.  Understanding Self-Report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research , 2002 .

[57]  D. Guest.  Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers , 2011 .

[58]  J. D. Jong,et al.  How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour , 2007 .

[59]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  IMPROVING LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICIES DO MATTER , 1996 .

[60]  A. Som.  Innovative human resource management and corporate performance in the context of economic liberalization in India , 2008 .

[61]  P. Wright,et al.  Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research , 2002 .

[62]  Neil Conway,et al.  Using sequential tree analysis to search for ‘bundles’ of HR practices , 2004 .

[63]  Chris Brewster,et al.  Line management responsibility for HRM: what is happening in Europe? , 2003 .

[64]  Philip Stiles,et al.  Human resource management on the line , 1997 .

[65]  R. Kline.  Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[66]  N. Ramamoorthy,et al.  Determinants of Innovative Work Behaviour: Development and Test of an Integrated Model , 2005 .

[67]  R. Kanfer.  Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[68]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[69]  L. Shore,et al.  The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process , 2003 .

[70]  Rosemary L. Batt,et al.  MANAGING CUSTOMER SERVICES: HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, QUIT RATES, AND SALES GROWTH , 2002 .

[71]  Dora Scholarios,et al.  Employees and High-PerformanceWork Systems:Testinginside the Black Box , 2000 .

[72]  K. Law,et al.  High-Performance Human Resource Practices, Citizenship Behavior, and Organizational Performance: A Relational Perspective , 2007 .

[73]  Neil Conway,et al.  Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK , 2003 .

[74]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[75]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[76]  Bård Kuvaas,et al.  Exploring alternative relationships between perceived investment in employee development, perceived supervisor support and employee outcomes , 2010 .

[77]  E. Parry,et al.  The impact of bundles of strategic human resource management practices on the performance of European firms , 2008 .

[78]  William A. Kahn.  Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work , 1990 .

[79]  Tom Redman,et al.  HRM Practices, Organizational Citizenship Behaviour, and Performance: A Multi-Level Analysis , 2010 .

[80]  Brian R. Dineen,et al.  Employee-Organization Exchange Relationships, HRM Practices, and Quit Rates of Good and Poor Performers , 2009 .

[81]  Yaping Gong,et al.  High performance work system and collective OCB: a collective social exchange perspective , 2010 .

[82]  R. Liden,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective , 1997 .

[83]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[84]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Organizational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Turnover: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis , 1991 .

[85]  A. Undén.  Social support at work and its relationship to absenteeism , 1996 .

[86]  Douglas R. May,et al.  The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work , 2004 .

[87]  Bård Kuvaas,et al.  An Exploration of How the Employee-organization Relationship Affects the Linkage between Perception of Developmental Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes , 2007 .

[88]  Fred O. Walumbwa,et al.  Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors , 2004 .

[89]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[90]  A. Saks.  Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement , 2006 .

[91]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[92]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[93]  P. Levy,et al.  The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future , 2004 .

[94]  Paul E. Spector.  Method Variance in Organizational Research , 2006 .

[95]  Randall P. Settoon,et al.  Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity , 1996 .

[96]  Nicholas Kinnie,et al.  HRM and Business Performance , 2008 .

[97]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[98]  David G. Allen,et al.  Do Organizational Socialization Tactics Influence Newcomer Embeddedness and Turnover? , 2006 .

[99]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[100]  Lynda Gratton,et al.  The three-dimensional people strategy: Putting human resources policies into action , 2003 .

[101]  Zinta S. Byrne,et al.  The relationship of emotional exhaustion to work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[102]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Reconceptualising line management in project‐based organisations: The case of competence coaches at Tetra Pak , 2007 .

[103]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. , 1990 .

[104]  Emma Soane,et al.  Working life: employee attitudes and engagement 2006 , 2006 .

[105]  Eean R. Crawford,et al.  JOB ENGAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND EFFECTS ON JOB PERFORMANCE , 2010 .

[106]  Norihiko Takeuchi,et al.  How Japanese manufacturing firms align their human resource policies with business strategies: testing a contingency performance prediction in a Japanese context , 2009 .