The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead.

We need teams in nearly every aspect of our lives (e.g., hospitals, schools, flight decks, nuclear power plants, oil rigs, the military, and corporate offices). Nearly a century of psychological science has uncovered extensive knowledge about team-related processes and outcomes. In this article, we draw from the reviews and articles of this special issue to identify 10 key reflections that have arisen in the team literature, briefly summarized here. Team researchers have developed many theories surrounding the multilayered aspects of teams, such that now we have a solid theoretical basis for teams. We have recognized that the collective is often stronger than the individual, initiating the shift from individual tasks to team tasks. All teams are not created equal, so it is important to consider the context to understand relevant team dynamics and outcomes, but sometimes teams performing in different contexts are more similar than not. It is critical to have teamwork-supportive organizational conditions and environments where psychological safety can flourish and be a mechanism to resolve conflicts, ensure safety, mitigate errors, learn, and improve performance. There are also helpful teamwork competencies that can increase effectiveness across teams or tasks that have been identified (e.g., coordination, communication, and adaptability). Even if a team is made up of experts, it can still fail if they do not know how to cooperate, coordinate, and communicate well together. To ensure the improvement and maintenance of effective team functioning, the organization must implement team development interventions and evaluate relevant team outcomes with robust diagnostic measurement. We conclude with 3 main directions for scientists to expand upon in the future: (a) address issues with technology to make further improvements in team assessment, (b) learn more about multiteam systems, and (c) bridge the gap between theory and practice. In summary, the science of teams has made substantial progress but still has plenty of room for advancement. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  J. McGrath.  Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[2]  A. Edmondson.  Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[3]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Does Team Training Improve Team Performance? A Meta-Analysis , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Does Team Building Work? , 2009 .

[6]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: a meta-analysis. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Beyond Team Types and Taxonomies: A Dimensional Scaling Conceptualization for Team Description , 2012 .

[8]  Scott I. Tannenbaum,et al.  Do Team and Individual Debriefs Enhance Performance? A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[9]  D. Waldman,et al.  A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models , 2014 .

[11]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Training Essentials: A Research-Based Guide , 2015 .

[12]  Sallie J. Weaver,et al.  Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness. , 2015, Journal of oncology practice.

[13]  Shannon L. Marlow,et al.  Saving lives: A meta-analysis of team training in healthcare. , 2016, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Amir Pezeshkan,et al.  Psychological Safety : A Meta ‐ Analytic Review and Extension , 2018 .

[15]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Leadership Training Design, Delivery, and Implementation: A Meta-Analysis , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  A century of progress in industrial and organizational psychology: Discoveries and the next century. , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Shanique G. Brown,et al.  Team Composition and the ABCs of Teamwork , 2018, The American psychologist.

[19]  Kelley J Slack,et al.  Teamwork and collaboration in long-duration space missions: Going to extremes. , 2018, The American psychologist.

[20]  Stephen M Fiore,et al.  The Science of Team Science: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and Research Gaps on Collaboration in Science , 2018, The American psychologist.

[21]  G. Goodwin,et al.  The Science of Teams in the Military: Contributions From Over 60 Years of Research , 2018, The American psychologist.

[22]  R. Grossman,et al.  Debunking Key Assumptions About Teams: The Role of Culture , 2018, The American psychologist.

[23]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Multiteam Systems: A Structural Framework and Meso-Theory of System Functioning , 2018 .

[24]  Amanda L. Thayer,et al.  Addressing the paradox of the team innovation process: A review and practical considerations. , 2018, The American psychologist.

[25]  Sallie J. Weaver,et al.  Teamwork in Healthcare: Key Discoveries Enabling Safer, High-Quality Care , 2018, The American psychologist.

[26]  Lauren E. Benishek,et al.  Evaluating Problem-Solving Teams in K–12 Schools: Do They Work? , 2018, The American psychologist.

[27]  Joseph A. Allen,et al.  Debriefs: Teams Learning From Doing in Context , 2018, The American psychologist.

[28]  John E Mathieu,et al.  The Evolution of Work Team Research Since Hawthorne , 2018, The American psychologist.

[29]  Steve W J Kozlowski,et al.  Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena: Challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods. , 2018, The American psychologist.

[30]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Foundations of Teamwork and Collaboration , 2018, The American psychologist.

[31]  K. Fiscella,et al.  The complexity, diversity, and science of primary care teams. , 2018, The American psychologist.

[32]  Shannon L. Marlow,et al.  Does team communication represent a one-size-fi ts-all approach ? : A meta-analysis of team communication and performance , 2018 .

[33]  Nicola Power,et al.  Extreme Teams: Toward a Greater Understanding of Multiagency Teamwork During Major Emergencies and Disasters , 2018, The American psychologist.

[34]  Semin Park,et al.  A Fitting Approach to Construct and Measurement Alignment , 2018 .

[35]  J. Tebes,et al.  Interdisciplinary Team Science and the Public: Steps Toward a Participatory Team Science , 2018, The American psychologist.

[36]  Matthias Spitzmuller,et al.  Terrorist Teams as Loosely Coupled Systems , 2018, The American psychologist.

[37]  Andrew S. Hanks,et al.  The Trade-Offs of Teamwork Among STEM Doctoral Graduates , 2018, The American psychologist.

[38]  Dorothy R. Carter,et al.  Teamwork Situated in Multiteam Systems: Key Lessons Learned and Future Opportunities , 2018, The American psychologist.

[39]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Development Interventions: Evidence-Based Approaches for Improving Teamwork , 2018, The American psychologist.

[40]  L. Weingart,et al.  Teamwork in the Intensive Care Unit , 2017, The American psychologist.