FDG-PET-based radiotherapy planning in lung cancer: optimum breathing protocol and patient positioning--an intraindividual comparison.

PURPOSE Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (CT) are increasingly used for radiotherapy (RT) planning in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma. The planning process often is based on separately acquired FDG-PET/CT and planning CT scans. We compared intraindividual differences between PET acquired in diagnostic (D-PET) and RT treatment position (RT-PET) coregistered with planning CTs acquired using different breathing protocols. METHODS AND MATERIALS Sixteen patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma underwent two PET acquisitions (D-PET and RT-PET) and three planning CT acquisitions (expiration [EXP], inspiration [INS], and mid-breath hold [MID]) on the same day. All scans were rigidly coregistered, resulting in six fused data sets: D-INS, D-EXP, D-MID, RT-INS, RT-EXP, and RT-MID. Fusion accuracy was assessed by three readers at eight anatomic landmarks, lung apices, aortic arch, heart, spine, sternum, carina, diaphragm, and tumor, by using an alignment score ranging from 1 (no alignment) to 5 (exact alignment). RESULTS The RT-PET showed better alignment with any CT than D-PET (p < 0.001). With regard to breathing, RT-MID showed the best mean alignment score (3.7 +/- 1.0), followed by RT-EXP (3.5 +/- 0.9) and RT-INS (3.0 +/- 0.8), with all differences significant (p < 0.001). Comparing alignment scores with regard to anatomic landmarks, the largest deviations were found at the diaphragm, heart, and apices. Overall, there was fair agreement (kappa = 0.48; p < 0.001) among the three readers. CONCLUSIONS Significantly better fusion of PET and planning CT can be reached with PET acquired in the RT position. The best intraindividual fusion results are obtained with the planning CT performed during mid-breath hold. Our data justify the acquisition of a separate planning PET in RT treatment position if only a diagnostic PET scan is available.

[1]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[2]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Impact of FDG-PET on radiation therapy volume delineation in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Improved Radiologic Staging of Lung Cancer with 2-[18F]-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose–Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Registration , 2003, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Target volume definition for 18F-FDG PET-positive lymph nodes in radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  A. Fischman,et al.  Comparison of alignment of computer-registered data sets: combined PET/CT versus independent PET and CT of the thorax. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  D. Visvikis,et al.  The role of PET/CT scanning in radiotherapy planning. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Paul Barnett,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Management Strategies for Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  G J Kutcher,et al.  The impact of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) lymph node staging on the radiation treatment volumes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Retrospective attenuation correction of PET data for radiotherapy planning using a free breathing CT. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  K. Camphausen,et al.  Why "Radiation Oncology" , 2006, Radiation oncology.

[13]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Test performance of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for mediastinal staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  R L Wahl,et al.  Metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: mediastinal staging in the 1990s--meta-analytic comparison of PET and CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  Fusion of respiration-correlated PET and CT scans: correlated lung tumour motion in anatomical and functional scans , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Branislav Jeremic,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography for Radiation Treatment Planning , 2005, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[17]  Elkan F Halpern,et al.  Optimal CT breathing protocol for combined thoracic PET/CT. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Variability of four-dimensional computed tomography patient models. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  W. Grove.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[20]  Gerald J. Kutcher,et al.  The impact of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) lymph node staging on the radiation treatment volumes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 2000 .

[21]  D. Hellwig,et al.  [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in lung tumors. Basis for discussion of the German Consensus Conference on PET in Oncology 2000]. , 2001, Pneumologie.

[22]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Impact of anatomical location on value of CT-PET co-registration for delineation of lung tumors. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Torsten Hothorn,et al.  Anatomische Genauigkeit der interaktiven und automatischen rigiden Registrierung zwischen Röntgen-CT und FDG-PET , 2007 .

[24]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective clinical study. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  J Hornegger,et al.  Anatomical accuracy of interactive and automated rigid registration between X-ray CT and FDG-PET , 2007, Nuklearmedizin.

[27]  R. Shekhar,et al.  Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  Ursula Nestle,et al.  Practical integration of [18F]-FDG-PET and PET-CT in the planning of radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the technical basis, ICRU-target volumes, problems, perspectives. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[29]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  Suresh Senan,et al.  A dosimetric analysis of respiration-gated radiotherapy in patients with stage III lung cancer , 2006, Radiation oncology.