Technology Integration: Best Practices–Where Do Teachers Stand? 5(11)

As technology becomes more available in k-12 classrooms and teachers apply it their teaching, it is important to consider how we are going to evaluate the technology integration efforts of teachers. This article summarizes the stages of technology integration, and then goes on to present examples of best technology integration practices. Finally, it offers questions to consider when assessing teachers and their uses of technology. The idea of "technology integration" has evolved during the last several decades from teaching programming, to utilizing drill and practice, to implementing integrated learning systems, to addressing computer literacy skills, to participating in web-based communities. A more current view of technology integration involves the practice of using technology in ways that are both curriculum-based and future-oriented. According to Ertmer (1999), teachers should focus on meeting content objectives within the "three Cs": communication, collaboration, and creative problem-solving. It also requires that attention be given to preparing students for the future: theirs, not ours. The challenge for today’s educators is not programming the computer or learning cumbersome DOS commands. It lies in using computers and other technologies in ways to promote meaningful learning for students. The purpose of this paper is to describe teachers’ transformation process into technology integrators, to explore best practices in teaching with technology, and to suggest how administrators might consider evaluating teachers’ integration efforts. Now that computer technology is more prevalent in classrooms, it is becoming less a decision of whether or not to adopt, and more of a dilemma of how to implement it effectively into instruction.

[1]  L. S. Vygotksy Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[2]  Francis D. Atkinson,et al.  Best practices of technology integrating teachers: pictures of practice from four elementary classrooms , 2000 .

[3]  K. King Educational Technology that Transforms: Educators' Transformational Learning Experiences in Professional Development , 2000 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[5]  Linda Evans,et al.  What is Teacher Development? , 2002 .

[6]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[7]  B. Wilson,et al.  A review of cognitive teaching models , 1991 .

[8]  Stephanie D. Teasley Constructing a Joint Problem Space: The Computer as a Tool for Sharing Knowledge , 1993 .

[9]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[10]  M. T. Peters,et al.  When the Best is not Good Enough , 1993 .

[11]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  The Cooperative Elementary School: Effects on Students’ Achievement, Attitudes, and Social Relations , 1995 .

[12]  Harvey Daniels,et al.  Methods that matter : six structures for best practice classrooms , 1998 .

[13]  M. Gettinger,et al.  Teacher and Student Evaluations of Cooperative Learning and Observed Interactive Behaviors , 1996 .

[14]  H. Becker Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing Survey: Is Larry Cuban Right? , 2000 .

[15]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. , 1981 .

[16]  Allan Collins,et al.  Learning Communities in Classrooms: Advancing Knowledge For a Lifetime , 1999 .

[17]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Comparison Of Computer-Assisted Cooperative, Competitive, And Individualistic Learning , 1986 .

[18]  I. Seidman Interviewing as qualitative research , 1991 .

[19]  Paul A. Pohland,et al.  Professional development as transformational learning , 2000 .

[20]  Peggy A. Ertmer Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration , 1999 .

[21]  Chris Dede,et al.  Emerging influences of information technology on school curriculum , 2000 .

[22]  K. Sheingold,et al.  Commonalities and Distinctive Patterns in Teachers' Integration of Computers , 1993, American Journal of Education.

[23]  Edward L. Vockell,et al.  What makes teachers use computers , 1994 .

[24]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Designing technology to support reflection , 1999 .

[25]  Valerie J. Janesick The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. , 1994 .

[26]  Aaron Doering,et al.  Integrating Educational Technology Into Teaching , 1996 .

[27]  P. Norton Teaching With Technology , 1998 .

[28]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[29]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[30]  Thomas J. Shuell,et al.  Teaching and learning in a classroom context. , 1996 .

[31]  Arthur A. Hyde,et al.  Best Practice: New Standards for Teaching and Learning in America's Schools , 1993 .

[32]  Maria Cardelle-Elawar,et al.  Students and Computers as Partners in Developing Students' Problem-Solving Skills. , 1995 .

[33]  Jerry Willis,et al.  A Recursive, Reflective Instructional Design Model Based on Constructivist-Interpretivist Theory. , 1995 .

[34]  M. David Merrill,et al.  Instructional Transaction Theory: Instructional Design Based on Knowledge Objects. , 1996 .

[35]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 1998 .