Why are you so slow? - Misattribution of transmission delay to attributes of the conversation partner at the far-end

Abstract This study addresses the question of how transmission delay affects user perception during speech communication over telephone systems. It aims to show that the occurrence of pure delay should not be neglected when planning a telephone or conferencing system even if no impact on the perceived quality of the call can be found. It is, for instance, known that, the communication surface structure changes dramatically when transmission delay is inserted by the communication system. Furthermore, studies suggest a change in the perception of the interlocutor at the far-end. This paper describes two experiments that assess the misattribution of the technical impairment delay to personality and behavior-related attributes of the conversation partners. The first experiment shows that interlocutors are perceived as being less attentive when conversing in a three-party setting with symmetrical and asymmetrical delay conditions. In the second experiment, the misattribution is considered in more detail looking at ascribed personality attributes in two-party interaction under transmission delay. For both experiments, comparing the conversation surface structure of delayed to non-delayed calls helped to understand the found outcomes.

[1]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Four ways five factors are not basic , 1992 .

[2]  P. Brady Effects of transmission delay on conversational behavior on echo-free telephone circuits , 1971 .

[3]  Nobuhiko Kitawaki,et al.  Pure Delay Effects on Speech Quality in Telecommunications , 1991, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[4]  Alexander Raake,et al.  Speech recordings for systematic assessment of multi-party conferencings , 2011 .

[5]  Miller S. Puckette,et al.  The Theory and Technique of Electronic Music , 2007 .

[6]  J. Lönnqvist,et al.  Posing personality: Is it possible to enact the Big Five traits in photographs? , 2013 .

[7]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[8]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[9]  Matthias Geier,et al.  Listening and Conversational Quality of Spatial Audio Conferencing , 2010 .

[10]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Co-Constructing Non-Mutual Realities: Delay-Generated Trouble in Distributed Interaction , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[11]  Stefanie Schurer,et al.  SEF Working paper : 12 / 2011 September 2011 The stability of big-five personality traits , 2011 .

[12]  Pierre A. Balthazard,et al.  Predictors of the emergence of transformational leadership in virtual decision teams , 2009 .

[13]  John A. Johnson,et al.  The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures ☆ , 2006 .

[14]  G. W. Allport,et al.  Trait-Names: A Psycho-lexical Study. No. 211. , 1936 .

[15]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[16]  A. Bouch,et al.  Of packets and people: a user-centered approach to quality of service , 2000, 2000 Eighth International Workshop on Quality of Service. IWQoS 2000 (Cat. No.00EX400).

[17]  Régine Le Bouquin-Jeannès,et al.  On the Evaluation of the Conversational Speech Quality in Telecommunications , 2008, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[18]  Anita M. Pomerantz Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[19]  J. Block The Five-Factor Framing of Personality and Beyond: Some Ruminations , 2010 .

[20]  R. Krauss,et al.  Effects of Transmission Delay and Access Delay on the Efficiency of Verbal Communication , 1967 .

[21]  C. Melnik NEW LIMITATION CHANGE TO Approved for public release , distribution unlimited FROM Distribution : Further dissemination only as directed by Elastomers and Coatings , 2022 .

[22]  Paul T. Brady,et al.  A statistical analysis of on-off patterns in 16 conversations , 1968 .

[23]  Raimund Schatz,et al.  It takes two to tango - assessing the impact of delay on conversational interactivity on perceived speech quality , 2010, INTERSPEECH.

[24]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[25]  Montse Pardàs,et al.  Deleted DOI: Audiovisual Head Orientation Estimation with Particle Filtering in Multisensor Scenarios , 2008 .

[26]  Damien J. Williams,et al.  Effects of Latency on Telepresence , 2009 .

[27]  L. R. Goldberg THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[28]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Misattribution and attributional redirection in distributed virtual groups , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  R. Cattell The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters. , 1943 .

[30]  Lewis R. Goldberg,et al.  What the hell took so long? Donald W. Fiske and the Big-Five factor structure. , 1995 .

[31]  Gernot Kubin,et al.  Same but different? — Using speech signal features for comparing conversational VoIP quality studies , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[32]  Alexander Raake,et al.  On interaction behaviour in telephone conversations under transmission delay , 2014, Speech Commun..

[33]  RuhlederKaren,et al.  Co-Constructing Non-Mutual Realities , 2001 .