ACROSS‐ENVIRONMENT GENETIC CORRELATIONS AND THE FREQUENCY OF SELECTIVE ENVIRONMENTS SHAPE THE EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF GROWTH RATE IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS

Trade‐offs can exist within and across environments, and constrain evolutionary trajectories. To examine the effects of competition and resource availability on trade‐offs, we grew individuals of recombinant inbred lines of Impatiens capensis in a factorial combination of five densities with two light environments (full light and neutral shade) and used a Bayesian logistic growth analysis to estimate intrinsic growth rates. To estimate across‐environment constraints, we developed a variance decomposition approach to principal components analysis, which accounted for sample size, model‐fitting, and within‐RIL variation prior to eigenanalysis. We detected negative across‐environment genetic covariances in intrinsic growth rates, although only under full‐light. To evaluate the potential importance of these covariances, we surveyed natural populations of I. capensis to measure the frequency of different density environments across space and time. We combined our empirical estimates of across‐environment genetic variance–covariance matrices and frequency of selective environments with hypothetical (yet realistic) selection gradients to project evolutionary responses in multiple density environments. Selection in common environments can lead to correlated responses to selection in rare environments that oppose and counteract direct selection in those rare environments. Our results highlight the importance of considering both the frequency of selective environments and the across‐environment genetic covariances in traits simultaneously.

[1]  N. Hausmann,et al.  Population Differentiation for Abscisic Acid Responsiveness in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae) , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[2]  J. Windig The calculation and significance testing of genetic correlations across environments , 1997 .

[3]  B. Walsh Escape from flatland , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[4]  D. Houle,et al.  Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  J. Cheverud Quantitative genetic analysis of cranial morphology in the cotton‐top (Saguinus oedipus) and saddle‐back (S. fuscicollis) tamarins , 1996 .

[6]  Harry Smith,et al.  Light Quality, Photoperception, and Plant Strategy , 1982 .

[7]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[8]  Julie R. Etterson,et al.  Constraint to Adaptive Evolution in Response to Global Warming , 2001, Science.

[9]  E. V. von Wettberg,et al.  Frequency and Microenvironmental Pattern of Selection on Plastic Shade‐Avoidance Traits in a Natural Population of Impatiens capensis , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[10]  E. Brodie,et al.  COSTS OF EXPLOITING POISONOUS PREY: EVOLUTIONARY TRADE‐OFFS IN A PREDATOR‐PREY ARMS RACE , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  J. M. Hoekstra,et al.  The Strength of Phenotypic Selection in Natural Populations , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Harry Smith,et al.  THE FUNCTION OF PHYTOCHROME IN THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT—II. THE INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION CANOPIES ON THE SPECTRAL ENERGY DISTRIBUTION OF NATURAL DAYLIGHT , 1977 .

[13]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  Interspecific competition alters natural selection on shade avoidance phenotypes in Impatiens capensis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[14]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  Genetic correlations among body condition score, yield, and fertility in first-parity cows estimated by random regression models. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  J. Stinchcombe Measuring Natural Selection on Proportional Traits: Comparisons of Three Types of Selection Estimates for Resistance and Susceptibility to Herbivore Damage , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[16]  R. Bonduriansky,et al.  Reproductive ageing and sexual selection on male body size in a wild population of antler flies (Protopiophila litigata) , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .

[18]  ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE IN PLASTICITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF IMPATIENS CAPENSIS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR PERFORMANCE IN NOVEL HABITATS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  K. Meyer Factor-analytic models for genotype × environment type problems and structured covariance matrices , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[20]  R. F. Lyman,et al.  The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. III. Genetic correlations and fluctuating asymmetries , 1991 .

[21]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Genetic differentiation in morphological responses to simulated foliage shade between populations of Impatiens capensis from open and woodland sites. , 1995 .

[22]  C. Weinig DIFFERING SELECTION IN ALTERNATIVE COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENTS: SHADE‐AVOIDANCE RESPONSES AND GERMINATION TIMING , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  R. Shaw MAXIMUM‐LIKELIHOOD APPROACHES APPLIED TO QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF REACTION NORMS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  D. Futuyma,et al.  The Evolution of Ecological Specialization , 1988 .

[26]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  The Adaptive Evolution of Plasticity: Phytochrome-Mediated Shade Avoidance Responses1 , 2003, Integrative and comparative biology.

[27]  R. Shaw,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity in Crepis tectorum (Asteraceae): genetic correlations across light regimens , 1994, Heredity.

[28]  M. C. Grant,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE OF LOCAL GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION IN PLANTS , 1996 .

[29]  D. Houle A dispatch from the multivariate frontier , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[30]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  Ecosystem engineers as selective agents: the effects of leaf litter on emergence time and early growth in Impatiens capensis. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[31]  M. Rausher,et al.  Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory , 1995, Nature.

[32]  D. Falconer The Problem of Environment and Selection , 1952, The American Naturalist.

[33]  L. Kruuk,et al.  Ontogenetic Patterns in Heritable Variation for Body Size: Using Random Regression Models in a Wild Ungulate Population , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[34]  DENSITY DEPENDENCE AND POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION OF GENETIC ARCHITECTURE IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS IN NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  C. Weinig PLASTICITY VERSUS CANALIZATION: POPULATION DIFFERENCES IN THE TIMING OF SHADE‐AVOIDANCE RESPONSES , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  E. H. Pyle,et al.  EVIDENCE OF ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE IN PLASTICITY: DENSITY‐ AND SITE‐DEPENDENT SELECTION ON SHADE‐AVOIDANCE RESPONSES IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  Johanna Schmitt,et al.  Effects of Red to Far‐Red Ratio and Plant Density on Biomass Allocation and Gas Exchange in Impatiens capensis , 1999, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[38]  Joe Hereford,et al.  COMPARING STRENGTHS OF DIRECTIONAL SELECTION: HOW STRONG IS STRONG? , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[39]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation , 2004, Heredity.

[40]  E. Brodie,et al.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN THE QUANTITATIVE-GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF FLORAL, LEAF, AND ALLOCATION TRAITS IN SILENE LATIFOLIA , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  M. Pigliucci Modelling phenotypic plasticity. II. Do genetic correlations matter? , 1996, Heredity.

[42]  K. Heath,et al.  Polymorphic Genes of Major Effect: Consequences for Variation, Selection and Evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2009, Genetics.

[43]  J. Cheverud,et al.  Research Article Comparing covariance matrices: random skewers method compared to the common principal components model , 2007 .

[44]  W. Ewens Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits , 1999 .

[45]  C. Goodnight,et al.  Empirical Comparison of G Matrix Test Statistics: Finding Biologically Relevant Change , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  M. Rausher,et al.  Diffuse Selection on Resistance to Deer Herbivory in the Ivyleaf Morning Glory, Ipomoea hederacea , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[47]  C. Riginos,et al.  Mechanisms of selection for drought stress tolerance and avoidance in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). , 2005, American journal of botany.

[48]  D. Roff,et al.  The evolution of trade‐offs: where are we? , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[49]  J. Schmitt,et al.  THE GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF PLASTICITY TO DENSITY IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[51]  S. Via THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF POLYPHAGY IN AN INSECT HERBIVORE. II. GENETIC CORRELATIONS IN LARVAL PERFORMANCE WITHIN AND AMONG HOST PLANTS , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[52]  Richard Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Variation, selection and evolution of function-valued traits , 2004, Genetica.

[53]  E. V. von Wettberg,et al.  Physiological mechanism of population differentiation in shade-avoidance responses between woodland and clearing genotypes of Impatiens capensis. , 2005, American journal of botany.

[54]  M. Blows A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[55]  D. Waller,et al.  GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF OUTCROSSING IN THE CLEISTOGAMOUS ANNUAL, IMPATIENS CAPENSIS. II. OUTCROSSING RATES AND GENOTYPIC CORRELATIONS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  Soft and hard selection on plant defence traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2005 .

[57]  J. Kingsolver,et al.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF CONTINUOUS REACTION NORMS: THERMAL SENSITIVITY OF CATERPILLAR GROWTH RATES , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[58]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic principal components and smoothed covariance matrices , 2005, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[59]  K. Gardner,et al.  Shared quantitative trait loci underlying the genetic correlation between continuous traits , 2007, Molecular ecology.

[60]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Light spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  E. V. von Wettberg,et al.  PARTITIONING ADAPTIVE DIFFERENTIATION ACROSS A PATCHY LANDSCAPE: SHADE AVOIDANCE TRAITS IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[62]  MICROGEOGRAPHIC GENETIC STRUCTURE OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND LIFE HISTORY TRAITS IN A NATURAL POPULATION OF IMPATIENS CAPENSIS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[63]  R. Lande QUANTITATIVE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF MULTIVARIATE EVOLUTION, APPLIED TO BRAIN:BODY SIZE ALLOMETRY , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[64]  K. Holsinger,et al.  Natural selection on light response curve parameters in the herbaceous annual, Impatiens capensis , 2004, Oecologia.

[65]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[66]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimation of genetic and phenotypic covariance functions for longitudinal or ‘repeated’ records by restricted maximum likelihood , 1997 .

[67]  J. Winsor Persistence of habitat dominance in the annual Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). J , 1983 .

[68]  J. Stinchcombe ENVIRONMENTAL DEPENDENCY IN THE EXPRESSION OF COSTS OF TOLERANCE TO DEER HERBIVORY , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[69]  M. Rausher,et al.  Testing for Environmentally Induced Bias in Phenotypic Estimates of Natural Selection: Theory and Practice , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[70]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  A Model for Optimal Reaction Norms: The Case of the Pregnant Garter Snake and Her Temperature‐Sensitive Embryos , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[71]  J. D. Fry Trade-Offs in Fitness on Different Hosts: Evidence from a Selection Experiment with a Phytophagous Mite , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[72]  J. Schmitt REACTION NORMS OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND LIFE‐HISTORY TRAITS TO LIGHT AVAILABILITY IN IMPATIENS CAPENSIS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[73]  M. Kirkpatrick Patterns of quantitative genetic variation in multiple dimensions , 2009, Genetica.

[74]  A. Tsoularis,et al.  Analysis of logistic growth models. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[75]  C. Schlichting,et al.  Reaction norms of Arabidopsis. I. Plasticity of characters and correlations across water, nutrient and light gradients , 1995 .

[76]  Rima Izem,et al.  Variation in Continuous Reaction Norms: Quantifying Directions of Biological Interest , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[77]  P. A. Astles,et al.  A comparison of methods to estimate cross‐environment genetic correlations , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[78]  R. Alatalo,et al.  Trade–offs between sexual advertisement and immune function in the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[79]  Emma Hine,et al.  Determining the Effective Dimensionality of the Genetic Variance–Covariance Matrix , 2006, Genetics.

[80]  S. Chenoweth,et al.  Orientation of the Genetic Variance‐Covariance Matrix and the Fitness Surface for Multiple Male Sexually Selected Traits , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[81]  G. Abrami Optimum Mean Temperature for a Plant Growth Calculated by a New Method of Summation , 1972 .

[82]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Differential Dispersal of Self-Fertilized and Outcrossed Progeny in Jewelweed (Impatiens capensis) , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[83]  S. Scheiner Genetics and Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity , 1993 .

[84]  J. D. Fry THE MIXED‐MODEL ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE APPLIED TO QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: BIOLOGICAL MEANING OF THE PARAMETERS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[85]  R. Lande,et al.  Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially heterogeneous environment: effects of genotype-environment interaction. , 1987, Genetical research.

[86]  C. Ballaré,et al.  Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms. , 1999, Trends in plant science.

[87]  Richard H. Ree,et al.  Phylogenetic evidence for a flower size and number trade-off. , 2007, American journal of botany.

[88]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Light-Depedent Dominance and Suppression in Experimental Radish Populations , 1986 .

[89]  M. Blows Complexity for complexity's sake? , 2007 .

[90]  Johanna Schmitt,et al.  Testing the Adaptive Plasticity Hypothesis: Density-Dependent Selection on Manipulated Stem Length in Impatiens capensis , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[91]  J. Wolf,et al.  Experimental Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity: How Predictive Are Cross‐Environment Genetic Correlations?* , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[92]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  Direct Estimation of Genetic Principal Components , 2004, Genetics.

[93]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size variability and competition in plant monocultures , 1986 .

[94]  A. J. Moore,et al.  The genetics of phenotypic plasticity in a colonizing population of the ladybird beetle, Hormonia axyridis , 1997, Heredity.

[95]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Density-dependent flowering phenology, outcrossing, and reproduction in Impatiens capensis , 1987, Oecologia.

[96]  M. Rausher TRADEOFFS IN PERFORMANCE ON DIFFERENT HOSTS: EVIDENCE FROM WITHIN‐ AND BETWEEN‐SITE VARIATION IN THE BEETLE DELOYALA GUTTATA , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[97]  K. Meyer Estimating covariance functions for longitudinal data using a random regression model , 1998, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[98]  G. Bell,et al.  The evolution of a pleiotropic fitness tradeoff in Pseudomonas fluorescens. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[99]  S. Brotherstone,et al.  Genetic and environmental smoothing of lactation curves with cubic splines. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[100]  A. E. Weis,et al.  MEASURING SELECTION ON REACTION NORMS: AN EXPLORATION OF THE EUROSTA‐SOLIDAGO SYSTEM , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[101]  R. Lande,et al.  GENOTYPE‐ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[102]  R Gomulkiewicz,et al.  Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[103]  PLASTICITY TO LIGHT CUES AND RESOURCES IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA: TESTING FOR ADAPTIVE VALUE AND COSTS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[104]  R. Veerkamp,et al.  A covariance function for feed intake, live weight, and milk yield estimated using a random regression model. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[105]  S. Sultan,et al.  Metapopulation Structure Favors Plasticity over Local Adaptation , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[106]  H. Kadarmideen,et al.  Genetic parameters for functional traits in dairy cattle from daily random regression models. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[107]  Ana L. Scopel,et al.  Far-Red Radiation Reflected from Adjacent Leaves: An Early Signal of Competition in Plant Canopies , 1990, Science.

[108]  J. Stinchcombe,et al.  How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[109]  M. Blows,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Female Preference Functions as Function‐Valued Traits , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[110]  M. Rausher,et al.  Genetic Constraints and Selection Acting on Tolerance to Herbivory in the Common Morning Glory Ipomoea purpurea , 1999, The American Naturalist.