Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement

Abstract If formulated optimally, geopolymer cement made from fly ash, metallurgical slags and natural pozzolans could reduce by 80% the CO 2 emissions associated with the manufacturing of cement. However, almost all standards and design codes governing the use of cementitious binders and concrete in construction are based on the use of Portland cement. The 100+ year track record of in-service application of Portland cement is inherently assumed to validate the protocols used for accelerated durability testing. Moreover, the entire supply chain associated with cementitious materials is based on the production of Portland cement. The geopolymerisation of aluminosilicates constitutes a radical change in construction materials chemistry and synthesis pathways compared with the calcium silicate hydrate chemistry which underpins Portland cement. Consequently, there are regulatory, supply chain, product confidence and technical barriers which must be overcome before geopolymer cement could be widely adopted. High profile demonstration projects in Australia have highlighted the complex regulatory, asset management, liability and industry stakeholder engagement process required to commercialise geopolymer cement. While the scale-up from the laboratory to the real-world is technically challenging, the core challenge is the scale-up of industry participation and acceptance of geopolymer cement. Demand pull by a carbon conscious market continues to be the key driver for the short term adoption of geopolymer cement. In the absence of an in-service track record comparable in scale and longevity to Portland cement, research is essential to validate durability testing methodology and improve geopolymer cement technology. Colloid and interface science, gel chemistry, phase formation, reaction kinetics, transport phenomena, comminution, particle packing and rheology, which are familiar concepts to minerals engineers, are also key building blocks in the development of geopolymer knowledge. Analysis of the nanostructure of geopolymer gels has enabled the tailored selection of geopolymer precursors and the design of alkali activator composition, aiding in establishing the relationship between geopolymer gel microstructure and durability.

[1]  Hamid Nikraz,et al.  Improvements in the strenght and water penetrability of low calcium fly as based geopolymer concrete , 2008 .

[2]  T Hakkinen.  THE PERMEABILITY OF HIGH STRENGTH BLAST FURNACE SLAG CONCRETE , 1992 .

[3]  P. Duxson,et al.  Effect of Alkali Cations on Aluminum Incorporation in Geopolymeric Gels , 2005 .

[4]  John L. Provis,et al.  Effect of Calcium Silicate Sources on Geopolymerisation , 2008 .

[5]  David A Lange,et al.  Image-based characterization of cement pore structure using wood’s metal intrusion , 1998 .

[6]  John L. Provis,et al.  The mechanism of geopolymer gel formation investigated through seeded nucleation , 2008 .

[7]  Anja Buchwald,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of geopolymers , 2009 .

[8]  Francisca Puertas,et al.  Effect of superplasticisers on the behaviour and properties of alkaline cements , 2003 .

[9]  John L. Provis,et al.  Spatial distribution of pores in fly ash-based inorganic polymer gels visualised by Wood’s metal intrusion , 2009 .

[10]  Ian Plimer,et al.  Heaven and Earth: Global Warming, the Missing Science , 2009 .

[11]  J. Deventer,et al.  The Role of Inorganic Polymer Technology in the Development of ‘Green Concrete’ , 2007 .

[12]  J. Provis,et al.  Designing Precursors for Geopolymer Cements , 2008 .

[13]  Kenneth J. D. MacKenzie,et al.  Synthesis, characterisation and thermal behaviour of lithium aluminosilicate inorganic polymers , 2010 .

[14]  Nick R. Buenfeld,et al.  Estimating transport properties of mortars using image analysis on backscattered electron images , 2006 .

[15]  Normando Perazzo Barbosa,et al.  Iron Distribution in Geopolymer with Ferromagnetic Rich Precursor , 2010 .

[16]  Sidney Diamond,et al.  Mercury porosimetry: An inappropriate method for the measurement of pore size distributions in cement-based materials , 2000 .

[17]  J. Ollivier,et al.  Interfacial transition zone in concrete , 1995 .

[18]  Francisca Puertas,et al.  Hormigón alternativo basado en escorias activadas alcalinamente , 2008 .

[19]  Karen L. Scrivener,et al.  Innovation in use and research on cementitious material , 2008 .

[20]  Rupert J. Myers,et al.  X-ray microtomography shows pore structure and tortuosity in alkali-activated binders , 2012 .

[21]  J. Ideker,et al.  Advances in alternative cementitious binders , 2011 .

[22]  Paulo J.M. Monteiro,et al.  The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymers , 2010 .

[23]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Influence of reactivity of fly ash on geopolymerisation , 2007 .

[24]  V. Lehtonen,et al.  Durability of Concrete Made With Alkali-Activated Slag , 1989, "SP-114: Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag, and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete: Proceedings of the Third International Conference".

[25]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  Geopolymerisation kinetics. 2. Reaction kinetic modelling , 2007 .

[26]  Moray D. Newlands,et al.  Estimation of the filler content required to minimise voids ratio in concrete , 2003 .

[27]  Della M. Roy,et al.  Chloride diffusion in ordinary, blended, and alkali-activated cement pastes and its relation to other properties , 2000 .

[28]  J. Provis,et al.  In situ ATR-FTIR study of the early stages of fly ash geopolymer gel formation. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[29]  Caijun Shi,et al.  Effect of mixing proportions of concrete on its electrical conductivity and the rapid chloride permeability test (ASTM C1202 or ASSHTO T277) results , 2004 .

[30]  D. Gemert,et al.  The Chemical Shrinkage of Pozzolanic Reaction Products , 1998, "SP-178: Sixth CANMET/ACI/JCI Conference: FLy Ash, Silica Fume, Slag & Natural Pozzolans in Concrete".

[31]  P. Banfill,et al.  Alkali activated fly ash: effect of admixtures on paste rheology , 2009 .

[32]  Á. Palomo,et al.  Alkaline activation of metakaolin–fly ash mixtures: Obtain of Zeoceramics and Zeocements , 2008 .

[33]  John L. Provis,et al.  Molecular mechanisms responsible for the structural changes occurring during geopolymerization: Multiscale simulation , 2012 .

[34]  Donald E. Macphee,et al.  A physico-chemical basis for novel cementitious binders , 2011 .

[35]  J. Sanjayan,et al.  Microcracking and strength development of alkali activated slag concrete , 2001 .

[36]  C. Shi,et al.  New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement , 2011 .

[37]  Á. Palomo,et al.  The role played by the reactive alumina content in the alkaline activation of fly ashes , 2006 .

[38]  M. Stampanoni,et al.  3D experimental investigation of the microstructure of cement pastes using synchrotron X-ray microtomography (μCT) , 2007 .

[39]  J. Provis,et al.  Attenuated total reflectance fourier transform infrared analysis of fly ash geopolymer gel aging. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[40]  John L. Provis,et al.  Hard x-ray nanotomography of amorphous aluminosilicate cements. , 2011 .

[41]  C. Shi,et al.  Alkali-Activated Cements and Concretes , 2003 .

[42]  Yoshito Nakashima,et al.  Mathematica Programs for the Analysis of Three-Dimensional Pore Connectivity and Anisotropic Tortuosity of Porous Rocks using X-ray Computed Tomography Image Data , 2007 .

[43]  Grant C. Lukey,et al.  Physical evolution of Na-geopolymer derived from metakaolin up to 1000 °C , 2007 .

[44]  John L. Provis,et al.  The role of particle technology in developing sustainable construction materials , 2010 .

[45]  Erich D. Rodríguez,et al.  Effect of binder content on the performance of alkali-activated slag concretes , 2011 .

[46]  V M Malhotra,et al.  Blended Fly Ash Cements A Review , 1999 .

[47]  Hjh Jos Brouwers,et al.  The hydration of slag, part 1: reaction models for alkali-activated slag , 2007 .

[48]  Á. Palomo,et al.  Compatibility studies between N-A-S-H and C-A-S-H gels. Study in the ternary diagram Na2O–CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O , 2011 .

[49]  Hjh Jos Brouwers,et al.  Flow analysis of water-powder mixtures: Application to specific surface area and shape factor , 2009 .

[50]  Jan Deja,et al.  Carbonation aspects of alkali activated slag mortars and concretes , 2002 .

[51]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[52]  Caijun Shi,et al.  Strength, pore structure and permeability of alkali-activated slag mortars , 1996 .

[53]  Hua Xu,et al.  Will Geopolymers Stand the Test of Time , 2009 .

[54]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Alkali-activated binders: A review: Part 1. Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products , 2008 .

[55]  Trevor Brown,et al.  Medium to Long Term Engineering Properties and Performance of High-Strength Geopolymers for Structural Applications , 2010 .

[56]  Sharif Jahanshahi,et al.  A new integrated dry slag granulation and heat recovery process , 2010 .

[57]  Ailar Hajimohammadi,et al.  Time-resolved and spatially-resolved infrared spectroscopic observation of seeded nucleation controlling geopolymer gel formation. , 2011, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[58]  G. Saoût,et al.  Influence of limestone on the hydration of Portland cements , 2008 .

[59]  Tao Ji,et al.  A concrete mix proportion design algorithm based on artificial neural networks , 2006 .

[60]  Volker Rose,et al.  High-resolution nanoprobe X-ray fluorescence characterization of heterogeneous calcium and heavy metal distributions in alkali-activated fly ash. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[61]  Priyan Mendis,et al.  Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs) , 2007 .

[62]  J. Brus,et al.  Preparation, structure and hydrothermal stability of alternative (sodium silicate-free) geopolymers , 2007 .

[63]  J. Deventer,et al.  Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art , 2007 .

[64]  H. H. C. Wong,et al.  Packing density of cementitious materials: Measurement and modelling , 2008 .

[65]  Hjh Jos Brouwers,et al.  The work of Powers and Brownyard revisited: Part 1 , 2004 .

[66]  Ángel Palomo,et al.  Mid-infrared spectroscopic studies of alkali-activated fly ash structure , 2005 .

[67]  Louise Keyte.  What's wrong with Tarong?: the importance of coal fly ash glass chemistry in inorganic polymer synthesis , 2008 .

[68]  John L. Provis,et al.  Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 2: the gel binder , 2009, Journal of Materials Science.

[69]  D. W. Hobbs,et al.  Concrete deterioration: causes, diagnosis, and minimising risk , 2001 .

[70]  John L. Provis,et al.  Chemical Research and Climate Change as Drivers in the Commercial Adoption of Alkali Activated Materials , 2010 .

[71]  N. Roussel,et al.  An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends , 2011 .

[72]  P. Bowen,et al.  Changes in portlandite morphology with solvent composition: Atomistic simulations and experiment , 2011 .

[73]  J. Deventer,et al.  Do Geopolymers Actually Contain Nanocrystalline Zeolites? A Reexamination of Existing Results , 2005 .

[74]  Per Goltermann,et al.  Packing of aggregates : An alternative tool to determine the optimal aggregate mix , 1997 .

[75]  J. Deventer,et al.  The Effects of Temperature on the Local Structure of Metakaolin‐Based Geopolymer Binder: A Neutron Pair Distribution Function Investigation , 2010 .

[76]  John L. Provis,et al.  Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 1: remnant fly ash particles , 2009, Journal of Materials Science.

[77]  J. Deventer,et al.  Evolution of Local Structure in Geopolymer Gels: An In Situ Neutron Pair Distribution Function Analysis , 2011 .

[78]  Caijun Shi,et al.  Interface between cement paste and quartz sand in alkali-activated slag mortars , 1998 .

[79]  G. Corder,et al.  Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement , 2011 .

[80]  J. Deventer,et al.  The effect of silica availability on the mechanism of geopolymerisation , 2011 .

[81]  Moray D. Newlands,et al.  Comparison of particle packing models for proportioning concrete constitutents for minimum voids ratio , 2002 .

[82]  Linus Perander,et al.  The use of XANES to clarify issues related to bonding environments in metakaolin: a discussion of th , 2011 .

[83]  Henghu Sun,et al.  Study on microstructure and mechanical property of interfacial transition zone between limestone aggregate and Sialite paste , 2009 .

[84]  Tarja Häkkinen.  THE MICROSTRUCTURE OF HIGH STRENGTH BLAST FURNACE SLAG CONCRETE , 1992 .

[85]  Karlson Hargroves,et al.  Factor Five: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Improvements in Resource Productivity , 2009 .

[86]  J. Deventer,et al.  The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation , 2005 .

[87]  J. Deventer,et al.  Effect of Alumina Release Rate on the Mechanism of Geopolymer Gel Formation , 2010 .

[88]  Duncan Herfort,et al.  Sustainable Development and Climate Change Initiatives , 2008 .

[89]  John L. Provis,et al.  Structural Evolution of Fly Ash Based Geopolymers in Alkaline Environments , 2008 .

[90]  Aminul Islam Laskar,et al.  Rheological behavior of high performance concrete with mineral admixtures and their blending , 2008 .

[91]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  The interface between natural siliceous aggregates and geopolymers , 2004 .

[92]  Kostas Komnitsas,et al.  Geopolymerisation: A review and prospects for the minerals industry , 2007 .

[93]  J. Thomassin,et al.  Experimental hydration of two synthetic glassy blast furnace slags in water and alkaline solutions (NaOH and KOH 0.1 N) at 40° C: structure, composition and origin of the hydrated layer , 1990 .

[94]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  Chemical interactions between siliceous aggregates and low-Ca alkali-activated cements , 2007 .

[95]  A. Atkinson,et al.  Automated identification of the aggregate–paste interfacial transition zone in mortars of silica sand with Portland or alkali-activated slag cement paste , 2000 .

[96]  Kamran M. Nemati,et al.  Preserving microstructure of concrete under load using the Wood’s metal technique , 2000 .

[97]  Hua Xu,et al.  Characterization of Aged Slag Concretes , 2008 .

[98]  Paul Mccormick,et al.  Investigation of a synthetic aluminosilicate inorganic polymer , 2002 .

[99]  K. Shimoda,et al.  Total understanding of the local structures of an amorphous slag: Perspective from multi-nuclear (29Si, 27Al, 17O, 25Mg, and 43Ca) solid-state NMR , 2008 .

[100]  Phillip Frank Gower Banfill,et al.  Properties of alkali-activated fly ashes determined from rheological measurements , 2005 .

[101]  P. K. Mehta,et al.  Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials , 2005 .

[102]  Fernando Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Alkali-activated binders: A review. Part 2. About materials and binders manufacture , 2008 .

[103]  John L. Provis,et al.  Pore solution composition and alkali diffusion in inorganic polymer cement , 2010 .

[104]  R. D. Hooton,et al.  Bridging the Gap Between Research and Standards , 2008 .

[105]  Rd Hooton,et al.  THE PERMEABILITY OF CEMENT SYSTEMS TO CHLORIDE INGRESS AND RELATED TEST METHODS , 2000 .

[106]  Roman Loser,et al.  Analysis of cement-bonded materials by multi-cycle mercury intrusion and nitrogen sorption. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[107]  Adil Amirjanov,et al.  Optimization of a Computer Simulation Model for Packing of Concrete Aggregates , 2008 .

[108]  N Bouzoubaâ,et al.  The effect of grinding on the physical properties of fly ashes and a portland cement clinker , 1997 .

[109]  C. Kaps,et al.  Alkali-activated metakaolin-slag blends—performance and structure in dependence of their composition , 2007 .

[110]  J. Deventer,et al.  Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties , 2005 .

[111]  Andi Arham Adam,et al.  Strength and durability properties of alkali activated slag and fly ash-based geopolymer concrete , 2009 .