Investigating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Framework to Capture User Needs in the Concept Stage of Rehabilitation Technology Development

This study evaluates whether the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework provides a useful basis to ensure that key user needs are identified in the development of a home-based arm rehabilitation system for stroke patients. Using a qualitative approach, nine people with residual arm weakness after stroke and six healthcare professionals with expertise in stroke rehabilitation were enrolled in the user-centered design process. They were asked, through semi-structured interviews, to define the needs and specification for a potential home-based rehabilitation device to facilitate self-managed arm exercise. The topic list for the interviews was derived by brainstorming ideas within the clinical and engineering multidisciplinary research team based on previous experience and existing literature in user-centered design. Meaningful concepts were extracted from questions and responses of these interviews. These concepts obtained were matched to the categories within the ICF comprehensive core set for stroke using ICF linking rules. Most of the concepts extracted from the interviews matched to the existing ICF Core Set categories. Person factors like gender, age, interest, compliance, motivation, choice, and convenience that might determine device usability are yet to be categorized within the ICF comprehensive core set. The results suggest that the categories of the comprehensive ICF Core Set for stroke provide a useful basis for structuring interviews to identify most users needs. However some personal factors (related to end users and healthcare professionals) need to be considered in addition to the ICF categories.

[1]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  The development of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation robot: identification of clinical practices and design requirements through a survey of therapists , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[2]  Martin Levesley,et al.  Engaging children in healthcare technology design: developing rehabilitation technology for children with cerebral palsy , 2010 .

[3]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development process , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  Penny Probert Smith,et al.  A design framework for a home-based stroke rehabilitation system: Identifying the key components , 2009, 2009 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[5]  Patrick Langdon,et al.  Converting disability data into a format suitable for estimating design exclusion , 2008 .

[6]  Natasha Campling,et al.  A Methodology for a Structured Survey of the Healthcare Literature related to Medical Device Users , 2008 .

[7]  A. Jackson,et al.  User involvement in developing Rehabilitation Robotic devices: An essential requirement , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[8]  Xin Feng,et al.  Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  Ian Robinson,et al.  User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. , 2006, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[10]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  Robert Riener,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  Nenad Kostanjsek,et al.  ICF Core Sets for stroke. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  Thomas Ewert,et al.  Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  D. McDonagh,et al.  Visual product evaluation: exploring users' emotional relationships with products. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  N Greenberg,et al.  Development and use of analytical quality specifications in the in vitro diagnostics medical device industry. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[16]  Laura Lin,et al.  Human Error in Patient-Controlled Analgesia: Incident Reports and Experimental Evaluation , 1998 .

[17]  Thomas W. King,et al.  Assistive Technology: Essential Human Factors , 1998 .

[18]  F. Fouladinejad,et al.  A computer aided learning package for training users and maintainers of medical equipment , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[20]  D. Wade,et al.  Recovery after stroke , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[21]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[22]  A. Williams,et al.  International classification of functioning, disability, and health: ICF-CY World Health Organization , 2013 .

[23]  恵子 紀国谷 国際生活機能分類(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF)にみた福祉・保健・医療の専門職協働における連携に関する貢献と課題 , 2007 .

[24]  William Rudelius,et al.  New product development process: Stages and successes in the medical products industry , 1997 .

[25]  Herman B. K. Boom,et al.  Bridging Disciplines For Biomedicine , 1997 .

[26]  S. Kilbreath,et al.  Task-specific training of reaching and manipulation , 1994 .

[27]  R. Cooper,et al.  0 0 0 0 An Investigation into the New Product Process : Steps , Deficiencies , and Impact , 1986 .