Conceptual models in pedogenesis: Can soil-forming functions be solved?

Abstract Quantitative solutions of the univariant soil-forming functions are reviewed. Lithofunctions are essentially of a comparative nature. Numerical solutions are possible if a coding of the parent material or its properties is made. The number of solutions of topofunctions and climofunctions is already considerable, though too few generally valid equations have been derived. These are required for the further development of the general solutions. Numerical solutions of true biotic functions are likely to remain exceptional and the biotic attributes are best considered as a dependent variable and property of the soil-ecosystem, like any of the soil properties. Several chronofunctions have been obtained for the initial stages of soil formation, and good graphical summaries for long-term soil development functions have been constructed, but strict numerical chronofunctions are rare because the difficulties in isolating and dating properly controlled sites. Runge's energy model uses incongruous terms whilst it essentially follows the tenets of the factorial system, but neglects the parent material (capacity) factor. Chesworth's weathering trend line does not disprove the absence of the steady state and his inference from this and his criticism of the state factor equation are essentially invalid. Because the number of degrees of freedom in the solution of the general soil formation function is rather large, the best way for advancing the solution of the state equation is by increasing the solutions of the univariant functions. It is suggested that the next step should be the preparation of a family of topofunctions, graphically or numerically, showing their change with time and on different parent materials or under different macroclimates. Computerized simulation models of such multivariate functions can then be prepared and compared with real data for further refinement and for pinpointing univariant functions or equations which are needed for the improvement of the solutions already obtained. Whereas the relevance of the univariant and multivariant functions of the state factors is in deriving the significant or major causal relationships, and thus explain or predict the distribution of soils in space and time, the computer simulation strategy can advance the quantification of the process-oriented models of soil dynamics.

[1]  R. L. Crocker,et al.  SOIL DEVELOPMENT IN RELATION TO VEGETATION AND SURFACE AGE AT GLACIER BAY, ALASKA* , 1955 .

[2]  R. V. Ruhe,et al.  Elements of the soil landscape. , 1960 .

[3]  J. Dijkerman,et al.  Pedology as a science: The role of data, models and theories in the study of natural soil systems , 1974 .

[4]  G. F. Hall,et al.  Soil Trends and Variability Across Selected Landscapes in Iowa1 , 1968 .

[5]  D. H. Yaalon,et al.  FRAMEWORK FOR MAN-MADE SOIL CHANGES-AN OUTLINE OF METAPEDOGENESIS , 1966 .

[6]  R. L. Hay,et al.  Rate of clay formation and mineral alteration in a 4000-year-old volcanic ash soil on Saint Vincent, B.W.I , 1960 .

[7]  H. Jenny Bodenstickstoff und seine Abhängigkeit von Zustandsfaktoren , 1965 .

[8]  R. Protz,et al.  Relation between Landform Parameters and Soil Properties1 , 1968 .

[9]  E. Runge,et al.  SOIL DEVELOPMENT SEQUENCES AND ENERGY MODELS , 1973 .

[10]  C. C. Nikiforoff Reappraisal of the Soil: Pedogenesis consists of transactions in matter and energy between the soil and its surroundings. , 1959, Science.

[11]  H. Birch,et al.  THE ORGANIC-MATTER AND NITROGEN STATUS OF EAST AFRICAN SOILS , 1956 .

[12]  H. J. Kleiss Hillslope Sedimentation and Soil Formation in Northeastern Iowa , 1970 .

[13]  H. Jenny,et al.  NITROGEN AND ORGANIC MATTER CONTENTS OF EQUATORIAL SOILS OF COLOMBIA, SOUTH AMERICA , 1948 .

[14]  J. Joffe,et al.  The siol forming process and soil evolution , 1962 .

[15]  P. Stevens,et al.  The Chronosequence Concept and Soil Formation , 1970, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[16]  E. Hallsworth,et al.  STUDIES IN PEDOGENESIS IN NEW SOUTH WALES: III. THE ALPINE HUMUS SOILS , 1952 .

[17]  R. Arkley CLIMATES OF SOME GREAT SOIL GROUPS OF THE WESTERN UNITED STATES , 1967 .

[18]  M. J. Jones,et al.  THE ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT OF THE SAVANNA SOILS OF WEST AFRICA , 1973 .

[19]  H. Jenny,et al.  Effect of climate and cultivation on nitrogen and organic matter reserves in Indian soils , 1960 .

[20]  G. Milne A Provisional Soil Map of East Africa , 1936 .

[21]  W. J. Vreeken Soil variability in small loess watersheds: Clay and organic carbon content , 1973 .

[22]  S ROBINSON,et al.  Chemical composition of sweat. , 1954, Physiological reviews.

[23]  A. Singer THE MINERALOGY OF THE CLAY FRACTION FROM BASALTIC SOILS IN THE GALILEE, ISRAEL , 1966 .

[24]  H. Jenny ARRANGEMENT OF SOIL SERIES AND TYPES ACCORDING TO FUNCTIONS OF SOIL‐FORMING FACTORS , 1946 .

[25]  W. Chesworth The parent rock effect in the genesis of soil , 1973 .

[26]  R. L. Crocker Soil Genesis and the Pedogenic Factors , 1952, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[27]  R. L. Crocker,et al.  Soil Development on the Recessional Moraines of the Herbert and Mendenhall Glaciers, South-Eastern Alaska , 1957 .

[28]  D. H. Yaalon,et al.  Downward movement and distribution of anions in soil profiles with limited wetting , 1965 .

[29]  P. Birkeland Pedology, weathering, and geomorphological research , 1974 .

[30]  F. Perring A Theoretical Approach to a Study of Chalk Grassland , 1958 .

[31]  Jack Major,et al.  A Functional, Factorial Approach to Plant Ecology , 1951 .

[32]  I Noy-Meir,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of the Semiarid Vegetation in South-Eastern Australia. II. Vegetation Catenae and Environmental Gradients , 1974 .

[33]  P. H. Walker Postglacial environments in relation to landscape and soils on the Cary drift, Iowa , 1966 .

[34]  G. MILNE,et al.  Normal Erosion as a Factor in Soil Profile Development , 1936, Nature.

[35]  R. Simonson,et al.  Outline of a Generalized Theory of Soil Genesis , 1959 .

[36]  P. Reiche A survey of weathering processes and products , 1950 .

[37]  H. Jenny Role of the Plant Factor in the Pedogenic Functions , 1958 .

[38]  P. Miller,et al.  Quantitative Relations Between Climate and Soil Formation , 1968 .

[39]  H. Jenny,et al.  INFLUENCE OF PARENT MATERIAL AND CLIMATE ON TEXTURE AND NITROGEN AND CARBON CONTENTS OF VIRGIN CALIFORNIA SOILS: I. TEXTURE AND NITROGEN CONTENTS OF SOILS , 1958 .

[40]  R. Huggett,et al.  Soil landscape systems: A model of soil Genesis , 1975 .

[41]  Jerry R. Kline,et al.  MATHEMATICAL SIMULATION OF SOIL‐PLANT RELATIONSHIPS AND SOIL GENESIS1 , 1973 .

[42]  Isaac Barshad,et al.  Factors Affecting Clay Formation , 1957 .

[43]  R. L. Crocker The Plant Factor in Soil Formation , 1967 .

[44]  T. Tanada CERTAIN PROPERTIES OF THE INORGANIC COLLOIDAL FRACTION OF HAWAIIAN SOILS , 1951 .