Optical Monte-Carlo Simulation to Evaluate Monolithic PET Detector Concepts

We present a framework based on Geant4 to evaluate the performance ofdifferent monolithic positron emission tomography (PET) detector stacksetups based on a LYSO:Ce crystal with dimensions 32mm x 32mm x 12mm. Theoptical properties of the scintillator were matched to measurements using anexperimental calibration setup. We obtained a light yield of $g_{LY=}$ 33000/MeV and an optical mean free path of $l_{p=}$ 18cm. The readout characteristics of the digital sensorarray, consisting of 4 x 4 digital photon counter (DPC) sensors from PhilipsDigital Photon Counting, were implemented to mimic the readout of thescintillation light captured by the DPC array in simulation and experiment.We generated calibration data using the simulation to train a positioningalgorithm and determined the position of experimentally measuredinteractions. The method performed well with a spatial resolution of below2mm except for a systematical deviation in one edge of the crystal. Usingexperimental calibration data to position experimental interactions weobtained aresolution of 1.68mm. Both in experiment and simulation the detector stackyielded the best performance when using retroreflectors as a wrapping. Inthe simulation the additional optical medium used to attach the reflectorhad a minor influence on the performance. Furthermore, the simulation wasused to determine the influence of the optical coupling between scintillatorand the glass plate protecting the DPC array. No benefit in the spatialresolution was obtained when changing the optical adhesive from a standardsilicon glue to a highrefractive-index coupling.

[1]  Pablo Conde,et al.  Performance Study of a Large Monolithic LYSO PET Detector With Accurate Photon DOI Using Retroreflector Layers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[2]  Giacomo Borghi,et al.  Probabilities of triggering and validation in a digital silicon photomultiplier , 2014 .

[3]  R. Mao,et al.  Crystal growth and scintillation properties of LSO and LYSO crystals , 2013 .

[4]  W. Chewpraditkul,et al.  Light Yield Non-Proportionality and Energy Resolution of Lu1.8Y0.2SiO5:Ce and LaCl3:Ce Scintillation Crystals , 2011 .

[5]  W. Chewpraditkul,et al.  Luminescence and Scintillation Properties of Ce-Doped LYSO and YSO Crystals , 2011 .

[6]  F. Beekman,et al.  Optical simulation of monolithic scintillator detectors using GATE/GEANT4 , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  T. Frach,et al.  The digital silicon photomultiplier — Principle of operation and intrinsic detector performance , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[8]  E. Auffray,et al.  Determination of the absolute light yields of LuYAP and LYSO , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[9]  I. Kandarakis,et al.  Evaluation of the light emission efficiency of LYSO:Ce scintillator under X-ray excitation for possible applications in medical imaging , 2006 .

[10]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Optimization of the effective light attenuation length of YAP:Ce and LYSO:Ce crystals for a novel geometrical PET concept , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[11]  C. Moisan,et al.  Testing scintillation transport models with photoelectron yields measured under different surface finishes , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[12]  A. Braemb,et al.  Scintillator studies for the HPD-PET concept , 2007 .

[13]  A. Dell'Acqua,et al.  Geant4 - A simulation toolkit , 2003 .

[14]  P. Dorenbos,et al.  High efficiency of lutetium silicate scintillators, Ce-doped LPS and LYSO crystals , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).