Contrast enhanced mammography: techniques, current results, and potential indications.

Contrast enhanced mammography: Techniques, current results, and potential indications M.B.I. Lobbes *, M.L. Smidt , J. Houwers , V.C. Tjan-Heijnen , J.E. Wildberger a Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Surgical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

[1]  John M Lewin,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. , 2003, Radiology.

[2]  John M Boone,et al.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[3]  M. Lobbes,et al.  Response monitoring of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy using breast MRI – a review of current knowledge , 2012 .

[4]  Serge Muller,et al.  Digital Mammography Using Iodine-Based Contrast Media: Initial Clinical Experience With Dynamic Contrast Medium Enhancement , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Felix Diekmann,et al.  Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography , 2007, European Radiology.

[6]  Jagdish Singh,et al.  Iodinated Contrast Media and Their Adverse Reactions* , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[7]  Serge Muller,et al.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Janice S Sung,et al.  Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. , 2013, Radiology.

[9]  Felix Diekmann,et al.  Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[10]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[11]  C. Boetes.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast , 2012 .

[12]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  J. Sayre,et al.  Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Serge Muller,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results , 2011, European Radiology.

[15]  W. Matthai,et al.  Comparative Safety of High‐Osmolality and Low‐Osmolality Radiographic Contrast Agents: Peport of a Multidisciplinary Working Group , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[16]  Andrew D A Maidment,et al.  Observation of super-resolution in digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2012, Medical physics.

[17]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  C. Kuhl.  The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. , 2007, Radiology.

[19]  C. Ronco,et al.  Subclinical acute kidney injury (AKI) due to iodine-based contrast media , 2013, European Radiology.

[20]  M. Yaffe.  Contrast-enhanced Dedicated Breast CT: Initial Clinical Experience: Prionas ND, Lindfors KK, Ray S, et al (Univ of California Davis Med Ctr, Sacramento; et al) Radiology 256:714-723, 2010 § , 2011 .

[21]  L. Tabár.  Imaging of the Breast - Technical Aspects and Clinical Implication , 2012 .

[22]  Felix Diekmann,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[23]  Felix Diekmann,et al.  Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions , 2012, European Radiology.

[24]  P. Aspelin,et al.  Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines , 2011, European Radiology.

[25]  B. Lee,et al.  Preparative fasting for contrast-enhanced CT: reconsideration. , 2012, Radiology.

[26]  C. Boetes,et al.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging , 2008, European Radiology.

[27]  E. Lasser.  Comparative safety of high-osmolality and low-osmolality radiographic contrast agents. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[28]  Corinne Balleyguier,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography , 2006 .

[29]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital Versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  J. J. Caro,et al.  The risks of death and of severe nonfatal reactions with high- vs low-osmolality contrast media: a meta-analysis. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.