Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self‐categorization and accentuation

This paper examines the hypothesis that patterns of stereotypic accentuation reflect the degree to which judged stimuli share the same social category membership as the stereotyper, Following self-categorization theory, the degree of this shared identity is operationalized in terms of the meta-contrast ratio as a function of the positions of (a) stereotyper and (b) stereotyped target relative to (c) the stereotyper's frame of reference. Three experiments are reported which sought to manipulate shared category membership either by extension of subjects' frame of reference or by extremitization of target and subject with respect to that frame. As predicted, greater shared identity was associated with stronger assimilation of the target to subjects' own position and with change in stereotype content. Findings are discussed in relation to theories of personality, social judgement and social cognition. Like the accentuation processes which underpin them, it is proposed that stereotypes are sensitive to comparative context and that they reflect veridically the social self-categorical properties of stimuli.

[1]  J. Fishman.  An Examination of the Process and Function of Social Stereotyping , 1956 .

[2]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Quantitative judgement in social perception. , 1959, British journal of psychology.

[3]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[4]  J. Eiser.  Judgement of Attitude Statements as a Function of Judges' Attitudes and the Judgemental Dimension , 1973 .

[5]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[6]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. , 1948, Psychological review.

[7]  S. Duval,et al.  Some perceptual determinants of perceived similarity, liking, and correctness. , 1976 .

[8]  Cognitive aspects of prejudice. , 1969 .

[9]  Brim Og,et al.  Individual and situational differences in desire for certainty. , 1957 .

[10]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  Attitude and Attitude Change: The Social Judgment-Involvement Approach , 1982 .

[11]  Thomas E. Nelson,et al.  Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. , 1988 .

[12]  Extremity of Judgment and Personality Variables: Two Empirical Investigations , 1983 .

[13]  C I HOVLAND,et al.  Judgmental phenomena and scales of attitude measurement, item displacement in Thurstone scales. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[14]  Ulrich Wagner,et al.  In-group inferiority, social identity and out-group devaluation in a modified minimal group study , 1986 .

[15]  H. Upshaw,et al.  THE EFFECT OF VARIABLE PERSPECTIVES ON JUDGMENTS OF OPINION STATEMENTS FOR THURSTONE SCALES: EQUAL-APPEARING INTERVALS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of the Contrast Effect and Its Implications for Intergroup Communication and the Indirect Assessment of Attitude. , 1972 .

[17]  A. Manstead,et al.  THE SOCIAL-CONTEXT OF STEREOTYPING AND DIFFERENTIATION , 1989 .

[18]  J. Turner,et al.  The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence , 1986 .

[19]  J. Harackiewicz,et al.  Contrast effects in attitude judgment: An examination of the accentuation hypothesis. , 1980 .

[20]  S. Cook,et al.  RATINGS OF FAVORABLENESS OF STATEMENTS ABOUT A SOCIAL GROUP AS AN INDICATOR OF ATTITUDE TOWARD THE GROUP. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  G. F. Mascaro,et al.  Contrast effects of background factors on the similarity-attraction relationship. , 1973 .

[22]  M. Manis,et al.  Judging psychopathology: Expectation and contrast , 1984 .

[23]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. , 1989 .

[24]  John C. Turner,et al.  Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations , 1991 .

[25]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Classification and quantitative judgement. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[26]  M. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories , 1987 .

[27]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[28]  B. Hayes,et al.  Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference , 1992 .

[29]  L. Diab.  Factors Affecting Studies of National Stereotypes , 1963 .

[30]  H. Tajfel.  Value and the perceptual judgment of magnitude. , 1957, Psychological review.

[31]  L. Diab.  FACTORS DETERMINING GROUP STEREOTYPES. , 1963, The Journal of social psychology.

[32]  T. Adorno.  The Authoritarian Personality , 1950 .

[33]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[34]  E. Fehrer.  Shifts in scale values of attitude statements as a function of the composition of the scale. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  D. Katz,et al.  Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. , 1933 .

[36]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. , 1957, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[37]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Binocular resolution and perception of race in South Africa. , 1958, British journal of psychology.

[38]  M. Rokeach.  Generalized mental rigidity as a factor in ethnocentrism. , 1948, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  C. McGarty,et al.  Categorization, accentuation and social judgement , 1988 .

[40]  J. Eiser.  Enhancement of Contrast in the Absolute Judgment of Attitude Statements. , 1971 .

[41]  John C. Turner,et al.  Is Limited Information Processing Capacity the Cause of Social Stereotyping , 1990 .

[42]  A. Parducci.  Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[43]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Effects of personality and own stand on judgment and production of statements about a central issue , 1965 .

[44]  Contrast and accentuation effects in category learning. , 1990 .

[45]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Categorization and social judgement , 1972 .