Psychological state and quality of life in patients having behavioral treatment (biofeedback) for intractable constipation

OBJECTIVE:Behavioral techniques, including biofeedback, improve symptoms in a majority of patients with intractable idiopathic constipation. However, it is unknown whether there is also improvement in patients’ psychological well-being and quality of life (QOL). It is also unknown whether psychological or QOL factors can be used to predict the response to treatment. We aimed to assess these factors prospectively.METHODS:Thirty-one consecutive patients (median age 36 yr) receiving biofeedback retraining for idiopathic constipation were studied. A bowel symptom record, the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) (n = 31) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (n = 20), both psychological measures, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (n = 22), a generic QOL measure, were recorded before and after treatment.RESULTS:Twenty-two of the patients felt subjectively symptomatically improved. When considering all patients, treatment resulted in decreased depression (p < 0.05), anxiety (p < 0.05), and somatic symptoms (p < 0.01) (psychological measures: GHQ-28), and improved general health (p < 0.05) and vitality (p < 0.05) (QOL measures: SF-36). Patients who improved symptomatically showed significantly higher scores on the GHQ-28 and SF-36, in contrast to the unchanged scores in patients who did not symptomatically improve. Pretreatment GHQ-28 did not predict who would benefit from treatment, but patients in whom pain, emotional problems, or low vitality interfered with daily living (SF-36 pain subscales) were significantly (p < 0.05) less likely to respond to treatment.CONCLUSIONS:The symptomatic improvement produced by biofeedback in constipated patients is associated with improved psychological state and QOL. Some of the psychological morbidity in these patients is reversible. QOL parameters may be useful for predicting a likely response to treatment.

[1]  D. Drossman,et al.  Bowel patterns among subjects not seeking health care. Use of a questionnaire to identify a population with bowel dysfunction. , 1982, Gastroenterology.

[2]  M. Kamm,et al.  Laser Doppler measurement of rectal mucosal blood flow , 1999, Gut.

[3]  A. Brook Bowel Distress and Emotional Conflict , 1991, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[4]  D. Drossman,et al.  Sexual and Physical Abuse and Gastrointestinal Illness: Review and Recommendations , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[6]  M. Kamm,et al.  Prospective study of biofeedback treatment for patients with slow and normal transit constipation , 1994 .

[7]  M. Kamm,et al.  Relationship between psychological state and level of activity of extrinsic gut innervation in patients with a functional gut disorder , 2001, Gut.

[8]  M. Kamm,et al.  Psychological morbidity in women with idiopathic constipation , 2000, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[9]  G. Huston The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[10]  G. Bassotti,et al.  Chronic idiopathic constipation: pathophysiology and treatment. , 1996, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[11]  M. Kamm,et al.  Outcome of colectomy for severe idiopathic constipation. , 1988, Gut.

[12]  M. Kamm,et al.  Response to a behavioural treatment, biofeedback, in constipated patients is associated with improved gut transit and autonomic innervation , 2001, Gut.

[13]  W. Whitehead,et al.  Biofeedback as a treatment approach to gastrointestinal tract disorders. , 1994, The American journal of gastroenterology.