Changing forest recovery dynamics in the northeastern United States

Historical deforestation and forest recovery in the northeastern United States holds important implications for ecosystem services and social conditions. Bridging natural and social sciences perspectives, and incorporating both quantitative and qualitative analysis, we contribute to a rich, multidisciplinary literature on US forest change by documenting at a fine scale changing land-cover patterns, identifying their key geophysical and social driving forces, and evaluating the strength and character of the on-going forest transition. The interpretation of five sets of aerial photographs – spanning the period 1936–2008 for a town in central New York State – shows that 25.8 per cent of the land area reforested. Two approaches explain the trend: (1) spatial analysis of landscape features (e.g. soil type, distance to road) and (2) a land-use history analysis based on secondary and grey literature as well as interviews with longtime landowners. Findings underscore the importance of cross-scalar analysis, with key explanatory variables ranging from local topography to national development patterns. Twentieth-century forest recovery is linked primarily to well-established inter-decadal processes: a decline in the farming sector, changing life and livelihood goals within farming families and associated land abandonment on areas marginal for agriculture. In contrast to historical trends, recent forest recovery is occurring on high-quality soils; in 2008 approximately 15 per cent of all forest occurred on such soils, which may hold implications for biodiversity. In addition, landowners are increasingly engaged in a mix of new land uses, including energy development, and there is a steady rise in the number of amenity-oriented rural residents. The Eaton study contributes detailed mapping of forest-cover change in an understudied part of the northeastern USA. It also informs debates about forest transition theory and the prospects for a ‘regressive tertiary stage’ for the study region.

[1]  B. Butler.  Family Forest Owners of the United States, 2006 , 2015 .

[2]  Peter Klepeis,et al.  Re-creating the Rural, Reconstructing Nature: An International Literature Review of the Environmental Implications of Amenity Migration , 2012 .

[3]  Navin Ramankutty,et al.  Prevailing Myths About Agricultural Abandonment and Forest Regrowth in the United States , 2010 .

[4]  Thomas R. Loveland,et al.  Land-use Pressure and a Transition to Forest-cover Loss in the Eastern United States , 2010 .

[5]  S. Sloan.  Reforestation amidst deforestation: Simultaneity and succession , 2008 .

[6]  Stephen G. Perz.  Grand Theory and Context-Specificity in the Study of Forest Dynamics: Forest Transition Theory and Other Directions , 2007 .

[7]  S. Stehman,et al.  Forestland Parcelization in Upstate New York Despite Economic Stagnation and a Declining Population , 2006 .

[8]  Andrew J. Hansen,et al.  EFFECTS OF EXURBAN DEVELOPMENT ON BIODIVERSITY: PATTERNS, MECHANISMS, AND RESEARCH NEEDS , 2005 .

[9]  Eric F. Lambin,et al.  Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change , 2005 .

[10]  M. Vellend,et al.  Environmental causes and consequences of forest clearance and agricultural abandonment in central New York, USA , 2005 .

[11]  P. Scull,et al.  Forest distribution and site quality in southern Lower Michigan, USA , 2004 .

[12]  L. Duram,et al.  A Local Example of Land-Use Change: Southern Illinois—1807, 1938, and 1993* , 2004 .

[13]  K. Medley,et al.  Historical Changes in Forest Cover and Land Ownership in a Midwestern U.S. Landscape , 2003 .

[14]  David R. Foster,et al.  Three hundred years of forest and land‐use change in Massachusetts, USA , 2002 .

[15]  S. Kristensen.  Agricultural land use and landscape changes in Rostrup, Denmark : processes of intensification and extensification , 1999 .

[16]  A. Mather,et al.  The forest transition: a theoretical basis , 1998 .

[17]  David R. Foster,et al.  Land-Use History (1730-1990) and Vegetation Dynamics in Central New England, USA , 1992 .

[18]  R. D. Nyland,et al.  Patterns of deforestation and reforestation in different landscape types in central New York. , 1990 .

[19]  D. Hill.  Forest fragmentation and its implications in central New York , 1985 .

[20]  Marion Clawson,et al.  Forests in the Long Sweep of American History , 1979, Science.

[21]  Peter Klepeis,et al.  Integrated land history and global change science: The example of the Southern Yucatán Peninsular Region project , 2001 .

[22]  R. D. Nyland,et al.  The development of forest Islands in exurban central New York state , 1986 .