The effect of lightweighting in automotive LCA perspective: Estimation of mass-induced fuel consumption reduction for gasoline turbocharged vehicles

Abstract The paper proposes a method aimed to support Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the evaluation of environmental benefits achievable by lightweight design solutions in the automotive field. The study is based on an in-depth calculation of car weight-induced Fuel Consumption (FC) resulting in the Fuel Reduction Value (FRV) coefficient; this is functional in modelling the use stage in a LCA perspective. The research is focused on Gasoline Turbocharged (GT) cars, since to date there is no systematic analysis of weight-induced FC reduction regarding this propulsion technology. The FRV is evaluated for a wide range of vehicle case studies representative of different classes within the 2015 European market. The assessment is performed concentrating on four standardized driving cycles in order to evaluate various driving styles both in the case of primary mass reduction only and in the case of secondary effect (powertrain adaptation in order to maintain vehicle's performance). For the vehicle case studies under consideration, FRV is within the range 0.159–0.237 and 0.252–0.477 l/100 km*100 kg respectively for mass reduction only and secondary effect. Starting from the data obtained, a criterion is refined for estimating the FRV coefficient based on car technical features. Such a method allows to estimate FC reduction precisely by means of the value of FRV closest to the specific application, and it is proposed as a valuable tool for LCA practitioners within the automotive lightweight context.

[1]  Sujit Das,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental evaluation of downsized vs. lightweight material automotive engines , 2014 .

[2]  Mohammed A. Omar,et al.  Life cycle assessment-based selection for a sustainable lightweight body-in-white design , 2012 .

[3]  Christoph Herrmann,et al.  Multi-level Modeling and Simulation of Manufacturing Systems for Lightweight Automotive Components , 2016 .

[4]  Hyung Chul Kim,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Vehicle Lightweighting: Novel Mathematical Methods to Estimate Use-Phase Fuel Consumption. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Christoph Koffler Life cycle assessment of automotive lightweighting through polymers under US boundary conditions , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[6]  Massimo Delogu,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing as Supporting Tools for EVs Lightweight Design , 2016 .

[7]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  CO2 and energy efficiency car standards in the EU in the context of a decarbonisation strategy: A model-based policy assessment , 2015 .

[8]  Marotta Alessandro,et al.  Technical report - Task 7 : Europe-centric Light Duty Test Cycle and Differences with Respect to the WLTP Cycle , 2012 .

[9]  Paul Compston,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Australian automotive door skins , 2009 .

[10]  Mohammed A. Omar,et al.  Quantifiable measures of sustainability: A case study of materials selection for eco-lightweight auto-bodies , 2013 .

[11]  Mamoru Mabuchi,et al.  Life cycle inventory study on magnesium alloy substitution in vehicles , 2007 .

[12]  Mica Grujicic,et al.  Total Life Cycle-Based Materials Selection for Polymer Metal Hybrid Body-in-White Automotive Components , 2009 .

[13]  Lynne Ridge,et al.  EUCAR - Automotive LCA Guidelines - Phase 2 , 1998 .

[14]  Mohammed A. Omar,et al.  Design for sustainability in automotive industry: A comprehensive review , 2012 .

[15]  Christoph Koffler,et al.  On the calculation of fuel savings through lightweight design in automotive life cycle assessments , 2009 .

[16]  D. Morrey,et al.  A coherent life cycle assessment of a range of lightweighting strategies for compact vehicles , 2015 .

[17]  Harald A. Franze,et al.  Modelling the Use Phase of Passenger Cars in LCI , 1998 .

[18]  Luis Reis,et al.  Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites , 2010 .

[19]  Jan-Anders E. Månson,et al.  Assessing the life cycle costs and environmental performance of lightweight materials in automobile applications , 2011 .

[20]  Leduc Guillaume,et al.  Environmental Improvement of Passenger Cars (IMPRO-car) , 2008 .

[21]  José Roberto de França Arruda,et al.  Use of recycled natural fibres in industrial products: A comparative LCA case study on acoustic components in the Brazilian automotive sector , 2014 .

[22]  Anju Baroth,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Lightweight Noryl* GTX* Resin Fender and Its Comparison with Steel Fender , 2012 .

[23]  A. Bandivadekar,et al.  The WLTP: How a new test procedure for cars will affect fuel consumption values in the EU , 2014 .

[24]  Armando Caldeira-Pires,et al.  Environmental benefits of substituting talc by sugarcane bagasse fibers as reinforcement in polypropylene composites: Ecodesign and LCA as strategy for automotive components , 2010 .

[25]  Marco Pierini,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a plastic air intake manifold , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[26]  Phillip Sharer,et al.  Fuel Economy Sensitivity to Vehicle Mass for Advanced Vehicle Powertrains , 2006 .

[27]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Environmental impact minimisation in an automotive component using alternative materials and manufacturing processes , 2011 .

[28]  S Latham,et al.  A reference book of driving cycles for use in the measurement of road vehicle emissions , 2009 .

[29]  J. Summerscales,et al.  Bio-based versus traditional polymer composites. A life cycle assessment perspective , 2014 .

[30]  Roland Wohlecker,et al.  Determination of Weight Elasticity of Fuel Economy for ICE, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Vehicles , 2007 .

[31]  Amgad Elgowainy,et al.  Impacts of Vehicle Weight Reduction via Material Substitution on Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Hyung Chul Kim,et al.  Life cycle assessment of vehicle lightweighting: a physics-based model of mass-induced fuel consumption. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Massimo Delogu,et al.  Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of a lightweight solution for an automotive component: A comparison between talc-filled and hollow glass microspheres-reinforced polymer composites , 2016 .

[34]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Environmental performance of self-reinforced composites in automotive applications — Case study on a heavy truck component , 2016 .

[35]  Matthias Finkbeiner,et al.  Statistical analysis of empirical lifetime mileage data for automotive LCA , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[36]  Francesco Del Pero,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a heavy metro train , 2015 .

[37]  Horst E. Friedrich,et al.  Impact of lightweight design on energy consumption and cost effectiveness of alternative powertrain concepts , 2012 .

[38]  Sundeep Inti,et al.  An Approach for Performing Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Pavements for Evaluating Alternative Pavement Designs , 2016 .

[39]  Massimo Delogu,et al.  Sustainable Design: An Integrated Approach for Lightweighting Components in the Automotive Sector , 2017 .

[40]  C. A. Bernardo,et al.  Environmental and economic performance of a car component: assessing new materials, processes and designs , 2016 .

[41]  Roland Geyer,et al.  Parametric assessment of climate change impacts of automotive material substitution. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Hyung Chul Kim,et al.  Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission benefits of lightweighting in automobiles: review and harmonization. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Curauá fibers in the automobile industry - a sustainability assessment , 2007 .