II—Jonathan L. Kvanvig: Millar on the Value of Knowledge
暂无分享,去创建一个
Alan Millar's paper (2011) involves two parts, which I address in order, first taking up the issues concerning the goal of inquiry, and then the issues surrounding the appeal to reflective knowledge. I argue that the upshot of the considerations Millar raises count in favour of a more important role in value-driven epistemology for the notion of understanding and for the notion of epistemic justification, rather than for the notions of knowledge and reflective knowledge.
[1] J. Kvanvig. The Value of Understanding , 2009 .
[2] T. Warfield. Knowledge from Falsehood , 2005 .
[3] W. Alston. Level-Confusions in Epistemology , 1980 .
[4] COHERENTISM AND JUSTIFIED INCONSISTENT BELIEFS: A SOLUTION , 2012 .
[5] Peter D. Klein. Useful False Beliefs , 2008 .
[6] E. J. Coffman,et al. Warrant without truth? , 2008, Synthese.