Automated nerve fiber counting using an array processor in a Multi-Mini Computer System

It has been suggested that recovery of motor and sensory function in the site distal to a peripheral nerve lesion should be improved if the nerve bundles (fasciculi) are matched and individually sutured. Three parameters are proposed to provide quantitative data: the count of the nerve fibers that regenerate, the number of functional regenerated nerve fibers, and a measurement of end organ reinnervation. A thin cross section of a transected and repaired sciatic nerve of a mongrel cat is fixed, stained, photographed, and digitized through a microscope 6 months following nerve repair. The data arrays are then subjected to four basic processing routines: edge enhancing, thresholding, template matching, and peak detection. Finally, the peaks are counted and provide an estimate of the number of nerve fibers in the nerve under study. Comparing counts of nerve fibers proximal and distal to the transection site of the nerve provide data on the proportion of regeneration present at various times. The content of this paper is, to a large extent, describing the implementation of the needed image-processing algorithms for automated counting on the Multi-MiniComputer System (MMCS). Optimal use of the AP-120B array processor and the pipeline processing provided by using the Eclipse 200s and the Nova 3 make a marked improvement in overall throughput.

[1]  G. Weddell,et al.  Peripheral nerve autografts , 1972 .

[2]  C. B. Shelman,et al.  Morphology of the primate optic nerve. 3. Fiber characteristics of the foveal outflow. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[3]  J. Terzis,et al.  EPINEURIAL VS. PERINEURIAL REPAIR: An Ultrastructural and Electrophysiological Study of Nerve Regeneration , 1977 .

[4]  B. Cragg,et al.  The conduction velocity of regenerated peripheral nerve fibres , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  D. Kline,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RESPONSE OF SPECIES TO PERIPHERAL-NERVE INJURY. I. SEVERANCE. , 1964, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  P. Lestrel,et al.  A computer program for comparing irregular two-dimensional forms. , 1977, Computer Programs in Biomedicine.

[7]  P.H. Bartels,et al.  Computer analysis and biomedical interpretation of microscopic images: Current problems and future directions , 1977, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  F. Bora Peripheral nerve repair in cats. The fascicular stitch. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  J. Schröder,et al.  Altered ratio between axon diameter and myelin sheath thickness in regenerated nerve fibers. , 1972, Brain research.

[10]  A. Dellon,et al.  Reinnervation of denervated Meissner corpuscles: a sequential histologic study in the monkey following fasicular nerve repair. , 1976, The Journal of hand surgery.

[11]  L. C. Higbie,et al.  Tutorial: Supercomputer architecture , 1973, Computer.

[12]  Patricia Johnson An introduction to vector processing , 1978 .

[13]  Bora Fw Peripheral nerve repair in cats. The fascicular stitch. , 1967 .

[14]  J. Michael Schro¨der,et al.  Altered ratio between axon diameter and myelin sheath thickness in regenerated nerve fibers. , 1972 .

[15]  D. Evans,et al.  A study of regeneration in a motor nerve with a unimodal fiber diameter distribution , 1956, The Anatomical record.

[16]  S. Sunderland,et al.  The branching of nerve fibers in human cutaneous nerves , 1951, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  C. B. Shelman,et al.  Morphology of the primate optic nerve. I. Method and total fiber count. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[18]  L. Guth,et al.  AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE EARLY STAGES OF PERIPHERAL NERVE REGENERATION. , 1965, Experimental neurology.

[19]  W E Kumley,et al.  On-line computerized entry and display of nerve fiber cross-sections using single or segmented histological records. , 1976, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[20]  J. J. Niebauer,et al.  Epineurial and perineurial fascicular nerve repairs: a critical comparison. , 1976, The Journal of hand surgery.

[21]  D. Pleasure,et al.  Regeneration after nerve transection: effect of inhibition of collagen synthesis. , 1974, Experimental neurology.

[22]  T. Kasvand PATTERN RECOGNITION APPLIED TO THE COUNTING OF NERVE FIBER CROSS-SECTIONS AND WATER DROPLETS , 1969 .

[23]  W. Grabb Median and ulnar nerve suture. An experimental study comparing primary and secondary repair in monkeys. , 1968, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  THE EFFECT OF REINNERVATION ON COLLAGEN FORMATION IN DEGENERATING SCIATIC NERVES OF RABBITS , 1947, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[25]  S. BeMent,et al.  Comparison of methods of peripheral nerve suturing in monkeys. , 1970, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  G. D. Shawe On the number of branches formed by regenerating nerve‐fibres , 1955, The British journal of surgery.

[27]  D. Pleasure,et al.  A study of nerve regeneration and neuroma formation after nerve suture by various techniques. , 1976, The Journal of hand surgery.

[28]  T J Willey,et al.  Basis functions for sinusoidal evoked potentials: a waveform analysis program on a small computer. , 1973, Computer programs in biomedicine.

[29]  B. Cragg,et al.  Changes in conduction velocity and fibre size proximal to peripheral nerve lesions , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  G. Weddell Axonal regeneration in cutaneous nerve plexuses. , 1943, Journal of anatomy.

[31]  G. Weddell,et al.  Peripheral nerve autografts. , 1973, The Journal of surgical research.

[32]  C. Topuzlu,et al.  A comparative analysis of macro- and microsurigal neurorrhaphy technics. , 1969, American journal of surgery.

[33]  G. Warden,et al.  Intraneural Neurorrhaphy: A Preliminary Clinical and Histological Evaluation , 1968, Annals of surgery.