Molecular architecture of a kinetochore–microtubule attachment site

Kinetochore attachment to spindle microtubule plus-ends is necessary for accurate chromosome segregation during cell division in all eukaryotes. The centromeric DNA of each chromosome is linked to microtubule plus-ends by eight structural-protein complexes. Knowing the copy number of each of these complexes at one kinetochore–microtubule attachment site is necessary to understand the molecular architecture of the complex, and to elucidate the mechanisms underlying kinetochore function. We have counted, with molecular accuracy, the number of structural protein complexes in a single kinetochore–microtubule attachment using quantitative fluorescence microscopy of GFP-tagged kinetochore proteins in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that relative to the two Cse4p molecules in the centromeric histone, the copy number ranges from one or two for inner kinetochore proteins such as Mif2p, to 16 for the DAM–DASH complex at the kinetochore–microtubule interface. These counts allow us to visualize the overall arrangement of a kinetochore–microtubule attachment. As most of the budding yeast kinetochore proteins have homologues in higher eukaryotes, including humans, this molecular arrangement is likely to be replicated in more complex kinetochores that have multiple microtubule attachments.

[1]  R. Zinkowski,et al.  The centromere-kinetochore complex: a repeat subunit model , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[2]  D. Koshland,et al.  Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP-C. , 1995, Molecular biology of the cell.

[3]  P. Sorger,et al.  Probing the Architecture of a Simple Kinetochore Using DNA–Protein Crosslinking , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  E. Salmon,et al.  Identification of a Mid-anaphase Checkpoint in Budding Yeast , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[6]  D. Koshland,et al.  Cse4p Is a Component of the Core Centromere of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Cell.

[7]  O. Stemmann,et al.  A putative protein complex consisting of Ctf19, Mcm21, and Okp1 represents a missing link in the budding yeast kinetochore. , 1999, Genes & development.

[8]  P. Sorger,et al.  The Unstable F-box Protein p58-Ctf13 Forms the Structural Core of the CBF3 Kinetochore Complex , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  E. Salmon,et al.  The polarity and dynamics of microtubule assembly in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  R. Baker,et al.  The N Terminus of the Centromere H3-Like Protein Cse4p Performs an Essential Function Distinct from That of the Histone Fold Domain , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[11]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[12]  T. Kues,et al.  Imaging and tracking of single GFP molecules in solution. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Budding Yeast Chromosome Structure and Dynamics during Mitosis , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  T. Ikemura,et al.  CENP-I is essential for centromere function in vertebrate cells. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[15]  G. Euskirchen,et al.  Nnf1p, Dsn1p, Mtw1p, and Nsl1p: a New Group of Proteins Important for Chromosome Segregation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Eukaryotic Cell.

[16]  P. Sorger,et al.  Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. , 2003, Genes & development.

[17]  Stanley Fields,et al.  Kinetochore protein interactions and their regulation by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[18]  J. Kilmartin,et al.  Interactions between centromere complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  H. Kimura,et al.  Dynamic behavior of Nuf2-Hec1 complex that localizes to the centrosome and centromere and is essential for mitotic progression in vertebrate cells , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  J. Tytell,et al.  Structure, function, and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[21]  P. Sorger,et al.  Binding of the essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore protein Ndc10p to CDEII. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  S. Biggins,et al.  Proteolysis Contributes to the Exclusive Centromere Localization of the Yeast Cse4/CENP-A Histone H3 Variant , 2004, Current Biology.

[23]  E. Salmon,et al.  Stable Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment Constrains Centromere Positioning in Metaphase , 2004, Current Biology.

[24]  E. Salmon,et al.  Hec1 and nuf2 are core components of the kinetochore outer plate essential for organizing microtubule attachment sites. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[25]  G. Chan,et al.  Kinetochore structure and function. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[26]  Peter K Sorger,et al.  Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Thomas D Pollard,et al.  Counting Cytokinesis Proteins Globally and Locally in Fission Yeast , 2005, Science.

[28]  P. Sorger,et al.  The yeast DASH complex forms closed rings on microtubules , 2005, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[29]  Kerry Bloom,et al.  Rho GTPase regulation of exocytosis in yeast is independent of GTP hydrolysis and polarization of the exocyst complex , 2005, The Journal of cell biology.

[30]  Andrea Musacchio,et al.  Architecture of the Human Ndc80-Hec1 Complex, a Critical Constituent of the Outer Kinetochore* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  Stefan Westermann,et al.  The Dam1 kinetochore ring complex moves processively on depolymerizing microtubule ends , 2006, Nature.