Feasibility of stationary digital breast tomosynthesis as an effective screening tool for patients with augmentation mammoplasty

Conventional mammography techniques used for imaging patients that have undergone augmentation mammoplasty produce substandard images, incomplete evaluation of breast tissue, and can cause discomfort to the patient. Typically, four images of each breast are acquired (double the amount of a patient without implants), two with the implant in view and two "pushback" views, which moves the implant posteriorly out of the field of view. The "pushback" view can be difficult to perform when there is encapsulation of the breast tissue around the implant. In severe cases, performing the technique can cause unwarranted pain to the patient. This technique can also result in up to a three times increase in procedure time which leads to lower patient throughput. Using 2D mammography, it is difficult to interpret tissue above and below implants due to the overlap of breast tissue and implant. Recently, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) has been shown to aid in the localization and diagnosis of breast masses by removing underlying and overlying tissue from the plane of interest in 3D space. However, commercial DBT systems have motion blurring of the projection images associated with x-ray source motion. To overcome this limitation, stationary DBT (s-DBT) has been developed. Here we report the feasibility of using s-DBT as an effective screening tool for patients who have undergone augmentation mammoplasty. Qualitative image analysis is completed on reconstruction images of tomosynthesis phantoms combined with implants. Reconstruction images show that it is possible to locate lesions above and below the implant using a clinically relevant entrance dose.

[1]  Tor D Tosteson,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  M. Silverstein,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women following augmentation with silicone gel-filled prostheses. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[3]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Dynamic reconstruction and rendering of 3D tomosynthesis images , 2011, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Tao Wu,et al.  Lesion Visibility in Low Dose Tomosynthesis , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[5]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  Improved imaging of the augmented breast. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Ian Shaw,et al.  Design and performance of the prototype full field breast tomosynthesis system with selenium based flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Tao Wu,et al.  A new generation FFDM/tomosynthesis fusion system with selenium detector , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Tuyen Phan,et al.  Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2009, Medical physics.

[9]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[10]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Yiheng Zhang,et al.  High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array. , 2012, Medical physics.