Feasibility and acceptability of providing nurse counsellor genetics clinics in primary care.

AIM This paper reports a pilot study to test the feasibility of providing genetic nurse counsellor clinics in primary care in the United Kingdom, to develop a questionnaire to evaluate patients' satisfaction with their genetics appointments, and to establish patient and provider costs. BACKGROUND Genetic counsellors are healthcare professionals with experience in medical genetics and counselling and often have a professional background in nursing, science, genetics, psychology, or public health and work as members of multidisciplinary teams. Professional genetic counsellor accreditation is possible in the United Kingdom, United States of America, Australia and Canada. Increasing referrals to specialist genetics services have precipitated a review of models of service delivery in the United Kingdom. METHODS A random half of 74 general practices in three primary care trusts were selected for the study, and the patients registered with these practices and referred to the clinical genetics service, were offered an appointment in primary care with a genetic nurse counsellor. A clinic follow-up postal questionnaire was developed. RESULTS Between July 2002 and May 2003, 64 appointments were offered to patients referred and registered with the selected general practices, 45 (79%) patients attended their appointment and 34 (77%) returned their follow-up questionnaire. Total mean satisfaction score was high and patients were most satisfied with the information and affective domains of the appointment. Those referred with a family history of cancer were more satisfied than those referred with a non-cancer diagnosis. Forty-eight per cent of patients seen by the genetic nurse counsellor did not need to attend a further appointment with a doctor in secondary care. Patients were satisfied with the travel time and distance to clinic and patient clinic costs were low. CONCLUSION Patients do attend genetic nurse counsellor clinics in primary care, and are satisfied with the new location. A large cluster randomized controlled trial is now being conducted to obtain a controlled comparison of clinic attendance rates and patients' satisfaction with clinics in primary vs. secondary care settings.

[1]  P. Ewings,et al.  Development of an audit tool for genetic services , 2005, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[2]  J Raftery,et al.  Imatinib for the treatment of patients with unresectable and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours: systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[3]  Audrey Paulman,et al.  Why We Don’t Come: Patient Perceptions on No-Shows , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[4]  Claire Dolling,et al.  Genetic Counsellors: A Registration System to Assure Competence in Practice in the United Kingdom , 2004, Public Health Genomics.

[5]  S. Abbott,et al.  Systematic review of recent innovations in service provision to improve access to primary care. , 2004, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[6]  H. Campbell,et al.  Patient satisfaction with two different models of cancer genetic services in south-east Scotland , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  R. Monsen,et al.  Portfolio evaluation for professional competence: credentialing in genetics for nurses. , 2003, Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

[8]  J. Powell,et al.  Systematic review of outreach clinics in primary care in the UK , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[9]  N. Qureshi,et al.  The genetics liaison nurse role as a means of educating and supporting primary care professionals. , 2002, Family practice.

[10]  B. Biesecker Goals of genetic counseling , 2001, Clinical genetics.

[11]  J Emery,et al.  The challenge of integrating genetic medicine into primary care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  R. Elles,et al.  Integrated regional genetic services: current and future provision. , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  A. Lucassen,et al.  Guidelines for referral to a regional genetics service: GPs respond by referring more appropriate cases. , 2001, Family practice.

[14]  A. Bowling,et al.  A national evaluation of specialists' clinics in primary care settings. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[15]  B. Bernhardt,et al.  Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment. , 2000, American journal of medical genetics.

[16]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Consumer health information needs to be rigorous, complete, and relevant , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Tensions in implementing the new genetics , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  C. Rogers,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting “same day” consultations in primary care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  A. Clarke,et al.  Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics? , 2000, Journal of medical genetics.

[20]  M. Gantley,et al.  Tensions between policy makers and general practitioners in implementing new genetics: grounded theory interview study , 1999, BMJ.

[21]  J. Austoker,et al.  The 'new genetics' and primary care: GPs' views on their role and their educational needs. , 1999, Family practice.

[22]  J. Emery,et al.  A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services. , 1999, Family practice.

[23]  H. Skirton,et al.  The role and practice of the genetic nurse: report of the AGNC Working Party. , 1997, Journal of medical genetics.

[24]  A. Clarke,et al.  Outcomes and process in genetic counselling , 1996, Clinical genetics.

[25]  S. Shiloh,et al.  Satisfaction with genetic counseling: dimensions and measurement. , 1990, American journal of medical genetics.

[26]  Pamela A Ratner,et al.  Women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk: the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[27]  C. Bartsocas,et al.  Education and certification of genetic counselors. , 1999, Genetic counseling.