Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) has been demonstrated to be clinically valuable, reducing risks of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, glycemic variability (GV), and improving patient quality of life for a wide range of patient populations and clinical indications. Use of CGM can help reduce HbA1c and mean glucose. One CGM device, with accuracy (%MARD) of approximately 10%, has recently been approved for self-adjustment of insulin dosages (nonadjuvant use) and approved for reimbursement for therapeutic use in the United States. CGM had previously been used off-label for that purpose. CGM has been demonstrated to be clinically useful in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes for patients receiving a wide variety of treatment regimens. CGM is beneficial for people using either multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). CGM is used both in retrospective (professional, masked) and real-time (personal, unmasked) modes: both approaches can be beneficial. When CGM is used to suspend insulin infusion when hypoglycemia is detected until glucose returns to a safe level (low-glucose suspend), there are benefits beyond sensor-augmented pump (SAP), with greater reduction in the risk of hypoglycemia. Predictive low-glucose suspend provides greater benefits in this regard. Closed-loop control with insulin provides further improvement in quality of glycemic control. A hybrid closed-loop system has recently been approved by the U.S. FDA. Closed-loop control using both insulin and glucagon can reduce risk of hypoglycemia even more. CGM facilitates rigorous evaluation of new forms of therapy, characterizing pharmacodynamics, assessing frequency and severity of hypo- and hyperglycemia, and characterizing several aspects of GV.

[1]  W. Zingg,et al.  An Artificial Endocrine Pancreas , 1974, Diabetes.

[2]  W Zingg,et al.  Clinical Control of Diabetes by the Artificial Pancreas , 1974, Diabetes.

[3]  Y. Yamasaki,et al.  Closed-Loop Glycemic Control with a Wearable Artificial Endocrine Pancreas Variations in Daily Insulin Requirements to Glycemic Response , 1984, Diabetes.

[4]  D. Rodbard,et al.  Personal Computer Programs to Assist with Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose and Self-Adjustment of Insulin Dosage , 1986, Diabetes Care.

[5]  D Rodbard,et al.  Ambulatory Glucose Profile: Representation of Verified Self-Monitored Blood Glucose Data , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[6]  D. Rodbard Potential role of computers in clinical investigation and management of diabetes mellitus. , 1988, Diabetes care.

[7]  M. Shults,et al.  Evaluation of a Subcutaneous Glucose Sensor out to 3 Months in a Dog Model , 1994, Diabetes Care.

[8]  F. Kaufman Role of the continuous glucose monitoring system in pediatric patients. , 2000, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  H. Chase,et al.  Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[10]  M. Phillip,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring for the evaluation and improved control of gestational diabetes mellitus , 2003, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[11]  G. Steil,et al.  Feasibility of Automating Insulin Delivery for the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes , 2006, Diabetes.

[12]  M. Rewers,et al.  Assessment and monitoring of glycemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes , 2007, Pediatric diabetes.

[13]  F. El-Khatib,et al.  Adaptive Closed-Loop Control Provides Blood-Glucose Regulation Using Dual Subcutaneous Insulin and Glucagon Infusion in Diabetic Swine , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[14]  W. Ward,et al.  The Benefit of Subcutaneous Glucagon During Closed-Loop Glycemic Control in Rats With Type 1 Diabetes , 2008, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[15]  Michael O'Grady,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Robert Cuddihy,et al.  Characterizing glucose exposure for individuals with normal glucose tolerance using continuous glucose monitoring and ambulatory glucose profile analysis. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[17]  C. Zou,et al.  Glucose metabolism disorder in obese children assessed by continuous glucose monitoring system , 2008, World journal of pediatrics : WJP.

[18]  R. Beck Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in a Clinical Care Environment , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[19]  Aaron J. Kowalski,et al.  Can we really close the loop and how soon? Accelerating the availability of an artificial pancreas: a roadmap to better diabetes outcomes. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[20]  R. Mazze,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): Is CGM ready for real time? , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[21]  Robert G. Sutherlin,et al.  A Bihormonal Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas for Type 1 Diabetes , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[22]  W. Kenneth Ward,et al.  Novel Use of Glucagon in a Closed-Loop System for Prevention of Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetes , 2010, Diabetes Care.

[23]  J. Simeone,et al.  The incidence and costs of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[24]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  A new index to optimally design and compare continuous glucose monitoring glucose prediction algorithms. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[25]  Rui Wang,et al.  Glycemic Variability in Abdominally Obese Men With Normal Glucose Tolerance as Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring System , 2011, Obesity.

[26]  D. Klonoff,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2011, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[27]  W. Kenneth Ward,et al.  Safe Glycemic Management during Closed-Loop Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes: The Role of Glucagon, Use of Multiple Sensors, and Compensation for Stress Hyperglycemia , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[28]  Bruce A Buckingham,et al.  Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[29]  Pratik Choudhary,et al.  Normal reference range for mean tissue glucose and glycemic variability derived from continuous glucose monitoring for subjects without diabetes in different ethnic groups. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[30]  Sina Askari,et al.  Usage and Effectiveness of the Low Glucose Suspend Feature of the Medtronic Paradigm Veo Insulin Pump , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[31]  Medha N Munshi,et al.  Frequent hypoglycemia among elderly patients with poor glycemic control. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[32]  Yariv Yogev,et al.  Measuring glucose exposure and variability using continuous glucose monitoring in normal and abnormal glucose metabolism in pregnancy , 2012, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[33]  Lotty Hooft,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[34]  David Rodbard,et al.  Hypo- and hyperglycemia in relation to the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and nature of the glucose distribution. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[35]  Xiao-hua Wang,et al.  Glycemic variability in gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with β cell function , 2013, Endocrine.

[36]  R. Bergenstal,et al.  Diurnal glucose profiles using continuous glucose monitoring to identify the glucose-lowering characteristics of colesevelam HCl (Welchol). , 2013, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

[37]  D. Rodbard Standardization versus customization of glucose reporting. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[38]  S. Madhu,et al.  Abnormal glycemic profiles by CGMS in obese first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[39]  A. Secher,et al.  The Effect of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women With Diabetes , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[40]  Suk Chon,et al.  Evaluation of glycemic variability in well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[41]  Steven J. Russell,et al.  A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Three Continuous Glucose Monitors , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[42]  Eckhard Salzsieder,et al.  Evaluation of the mean absolute glucose change as a measure of glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring data. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[43]  M. Leinung,et al.  Benefits of short-term professional continuous glucose monitoring in clinical practice. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[44]  David Rodbard,et al.  Increased glycemic variability at the onset and during progression of type 2 diabetes-commentary. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[45]  D. Klonoff,et al.  Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  M. Wolden,et al.  Understanding the economic burden of nonsevere nocturnal hypoglycemic events: impact on work productivity, disease management, and resource utilization. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[47]  A. M. Kyaw,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glucose control in diabetes , 2013, Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome.

[48]  D. Klonoff,et al.  Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP). , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[49]  Guido Freckmann,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Evidence and Consensus Statement for Clinical Use , 2013, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[50]  G. Steil,et al.  Dietary Fat Acutely Increases Glucose Concentrations and Insulin Requirements in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[51]  Understanding the economic, daily functioning, and diabetes management burden of non-severe nocturnal hypoglycemic events in Canada: differences between type 1 and type 2 , 2014, Journal of medical economics.

[52]  Cory Siebe National Estimates of Insulin-related Hypoglycemia and Errors Leading to Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations , 2014 .

[53]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Closed-Loop Control Performance of the Hypoglycemia-Hyperglycemia Minimizer (HHM) System in a Feasibility Study , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[54]  H. Wolpert,et al.  Development of the Likelihood of Low Glucose (LLG) Algorithm for Evaluating Risk of Hypoglycemia , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[55]  Peter A Baghurst,et al.  The Minimum Duration of Sensor Data From Which Glycemic Variability Can Be Consistently Assessed , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[56]  Ronald Brazg,et al.  Accuracy and acceptability of the 6-day Enlite continuous subcutaneous glucose sensor. , 2014, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[57]  Sofia Dahlqvist,et al.  A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 sensor (Dexcom G4 system) and Enlite sensor (guardian REAL-time system) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2014, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[58]  M. Brod,et al.  The psychosocial and financial impact of non-severe hypoglycemic events on people with diabetes: two international surveys , 2014, Journal of medical economics.

[59]  David M Nathan,et al.  Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[60]  Robert A. Vigersky,et al.  Glycemic Variability in Nondiabetic Morbidly Obese Persons , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[61]  Eckhard Salzsieder,et al.  Q-Score: development of a new metric for continuous glucose monitoring that enables stratification of antihyperglycaemic therapies , 2015, BMC Endocrine Disorders.

[62]  L. Magni,et al.  Multicenter outpatient dinner/overnight reduction of hypoglycemia and increased time of glucose in target with a wearable artificial pancreas using modular model predictive control in adults with type 1 diabetes , 2015, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[63]  Darrell M. Wilson,et al.  Erratum. Predictive Low-Glucose Insulin Suspension Reduces Duration of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Children Without Increasing Ketosis. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1197–1204 , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[64]  Malgorzata E. Wilinska,et al.  Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Free-Living, Randomized Clinical Trial , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[65]  Stephen D Patek,et al.  Assessing sensor accuracy for non-adjunct use of continuous glucose monitoring. , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[66]  G. Dogbey,et al.  Hypoglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes - More Common Than You Think , 2015, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[67]  S. Garg,et al.  Hypoglycemia Reduction and Changes in Hemoglobin A1c in the ASPIRE In-Home Study , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[68]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Sensitivity of the Predictive Hypoglycemia Minimizer System to the Algorithm Aggressiveness Factor , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[69]  D. Rodbard Evaluating Quality of Glycemic Control , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[70]  Malgorzata E. Wilinska,et al.  Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring During Three Closed-Loop Home Studies Under Free-Living Conditions , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[71]  Rajiv V Shah,et al.  Retrospective analysis of the real-world use of the threshold suspend feature of sensor-augmented insulin pumps. , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[72]  G. Ellison,et al.  Analysis of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women With Diabetes: Distinct Temporal Patterns of Glucose Associated With Large-for-Gestational-Age Infants , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[73]  B. Wayne Bequette,et al.  Predictive Low-Glucose Insulin Suspension Reduces Duration of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Children Without Increasing Ketosis , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[74]  T. Bailey,et al.  The Performance and Usability of a Factory-Calibrated Flash Glucose Monitoring System , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[75]  D. Price,et al.  Are Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Appropriate Tools for Assessing Evolving Medical Device Technologies? , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[76]  Ian F Godsland,et al.  Measures of Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes and the Effect of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[77]  M. Ladouceur,et al.  Efficacy of dual-hormone artificial pancreas to alleviate the carbohydrate-counting burden of type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial. , 2016, Diabetes & metabolism.

[78]  L. Laffel Improved Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Pediatric Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Results from Two Studies. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[79]  Gerry Rayman,et al.  Flash Glucose-Sensing Technology as a Replacement for Blood Glucose Monitoring for the Management of Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: a Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial , 2016, Diabetes Therapy.

[80]  Continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist dulaglutide in combination with prandial insulin lispro: an AWARD‐4 substudy , 2016, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[81]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  From Two to One Per Day Calibration of Dexcom G4 Platinum by a Time-Varying Day-Specific Bayesian Prior. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[82]  R. Rabasa-Lhoret,et al.  Comparison of Two Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems, Dexcom G4 Platinum and Medtronic Paradigm Veo Enlite System, at Rest and During Exercise. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[83]  G. Tomlinson,et al.  CONCEPTT: Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Women with Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy Trial: A multi-center, multi-national, randomized controlled trial - Study protocol , 2016, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[84]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Glucose Control in the ICU , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[85]  Bruce W Bode,et al.  Safety of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. , 2016, JAMA.

[86]  Dejian Lai,et al.  Glucose Variability in a 26-Week Randomized Comparison of Mealtime Treatment With Rapid-Acting Insulin Versus GLP-1 Agonist in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes at High Cardiovascular Risk , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[87]  T. Heise,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Aspart Across a Clinically Relevant Dose Range in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus , 2016, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[88]  L. Magni,et al.  Day-and-Night Closed-Loop Glucose Control in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Under Free-Living Conditions: Results of a Single-Arm 1-Month Experience Compared With a Previously Reported Feasibility Study of Evening and Night at Home , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[89]  S. PatelNeha,et al.  Mitigating Reductions in Glucose During Exercise on Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery: The Ex-Snacks Study. , 2016 .

[90]  Irl B Hirsch,et al.  CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING: A CONSENSUS CONFERENCE OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY. , 2016, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

[91]  H. Rodbard,et al.  The Effect of Canagliflozin, a Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor, on Glycemic End Points Assessed by Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Patient-Reported Outcomes Among People With Type 1 Diabetes , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[92]  Alison B. Evert,et al.  Diabetes Technology-Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2016, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[93]  Dana Lewis,et al.  Real-World Use of Open Source Artificial Pancreas Systems , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[94]  Lizheng Shi,et al.  Economic burden of hypoglycemia: Utilization of emergency department and outpatient services in the United States (2005–2009) , 2016, Journal of medical economics.

[95]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Coming of age: the artificial pancreas for type 1 diabetes , 2016, Diabetologia.

[96]  Darrell M. Wilson,et al.  Efficacy of an Overnight Predictive Low-Glucose Suspend System in Relation to Hypoglycemia Risk Factors in Youth and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[97]  Neha Parikh,et al.  Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Type 1 Diabetes During Supervised Outpatient Conditions , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[98]  Joyce M Lee,et al.  A Patient-Designed Do-It-Yourself Mobile Technology System for Diabetes: Promise and Challenges for a New Era in Medicine. , 2016, JAMA.

[99]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Outcome Measures for Artificial Pancreas Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[100]  P. Geelhoed-Duijvestijn,et al.  Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[101]  R. Beck,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[102]  J. DeVries,et al.  Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial. , 2016, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[103]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Home Use of Day-and-Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Suboptimally Controlled Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A 3-Week, Free-Living, Randomized Crossover Trial , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[104]  Pride Investigators Round Table Discussion on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring at the International Hospital Diabetes Meeting. , 2016 .

[105]  W. Polonsky,et al.  Design and Methods of a Randomized Trial of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Persons With Type 1 Diabetes With Impaired Glycemic Control Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections (GOLD Study) , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[106]  D. Stocken,et al.  Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in longstanding type 1 diabetes: A multicenter 2×2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose selfmonitoring (HypoCOMPaSS) , 2016 .

[107]  Jodie C. Horsburgh,et al.  Glycemia, Treatment Satisfaction, Cognition, and Sleep Quality in Adults and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes When Using a Closed-Loop System Overnight Versus Sensor-Augmented Pump with Low-Glucose Suspend Function: A Randomized Crossover Study. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[108]  A. Maran,et al.  Head-to-head comparison between flash and continuous glucose monitoring systems in outpatients with type 1 diabetes , 2016, Journal of Endocrinological Investigation.

[109]  Stephanie J. Fonda,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (RT-CGM) in Type 2 Diabetes , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[110]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery during Pregnancy in Women with Type 1 Diabetes. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[111]  W. Tamborlane,et al.  Mitigating Reductions in Glucose During Exercise on Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery: The Ex-Snacks Study. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[112]  J. Hans DeVries,et al.  Accuracy and Longevity of an Implantable Continuous Glucose Sensor in the PRECISE Study: A 180-Day, Prospective, Multicenter, Pivotal Trial , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[113]  R. Bergenstal,et al.  Diurnal glucose exposure profiles of patients treated with lixisenatide before breakfast or the main meal of the day: An analysis using continuous glucose monitoring , 2017, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[114]  Sofia Dahlqvist,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs Conventional Therapy for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The GOLD Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[115]  D. Maahs,et al.  Ambulatory glucose profile analysis of the juvenile diabetes research foundation continuous glucose monitoring dataset—Applications to the pediatric diabetes population , 2017, Pediatric diabetes.

[116]  Benyamin Grosman,et al.  Automated hybrid closed‐loop control with a proportional‐integral‐derivative based system in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes: individualizing settings for optimal performance , 2017, Pediatric diabetes.

[117]  Lauren M. Huyett,et al.  Response to Comment on Pinsker et al. Randomized Crossover Comparison of Personalized MPC and PID Control Algorithms for the Artificial Pancreas. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1135–1142 , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[118]  Robert Vigersky,et al.  Role of continuous glucose monitoring for type 2 in diabetes management and research. , 2017, Journal of diabetes and its complications.

[119]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Day-and-night glycaemic control with closed-loop insulin delivery versus conventional insulin pump therapy in free-living adults with well controlled type 1 diabetes: an open-label, randomised, crossover study , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[120]  GrahamClaudia Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Global Reimbursement: An Update. , 2017 .

[121]  A. Nicolucci,et al.  Healthcare resource use, direct and indirect costs of hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and nationwide projections. Results of the HYPOS-1 study. , 2017, Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD.

[122]  R. Bergenstal,et al.  Comparison of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL and 100 Units/mL in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Profiles and Variability Using Morning or Evening Injections , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[123]  Howard Wolpert,et al.  Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[124]  E. Atlas,et al.  MD‐Logic overnight type 1 diabetes control in home settings: A multicentre, multinational, single blind randomized trial , 2017, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[125]  Benyamin Grosman,et al.  Glucose Outcomes with the In-Home Use of a Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes , 2017, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[126]  Roman Hovorka,et al.  Closed-loop insulin delivery in inpatients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group trial. , 2017, The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology.

[127]  Christopher G Parkin,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Type 1 Diabetes: Longitudinal Analysis Demonstrates Meaningful Improvements in HbA1c and Reductions in Health Care Utilization , 2017, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[128]  Steven V. Edelman,et al.  Regulation Catches Up to Reality , 2017, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[129]  C. Graham Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Global Reimbursement: An Update. , 2017, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[130]  Bruce A Buckingham,et al.  Home use of a bihormonal bionic pancreas versus insulin pump therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre randomised crossover trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[131]  Steven V. Edelman,et al.  Recommendations for Using Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring (rtCGM) Data for Insulin Adjustments in Type 1 Diabetes , 2016, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[132]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Feasibility of Long-Term Closed-Loop Control: A Multicenter 6-Month Trial of 24/7 Automated Insulin Delivery. , 2017, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.