Evaluation of a segmentation procedure to delineate organs for use in construction of a radiation therapy planning atlas

OBJECTIVES This paper evaluates a semi-automatic segmentation procedure to enhance utilizing atlas based treatment plans. For this application, it is crucial to provide a collection of 'reference' organs, restorable from the atlas so that they closely match those of the current patient. To enable assembling representative organs, we developed a semi-automatic procedure using an active contour method. METHOD The 3D organ volume was identified by defining contours on individual slices. The initial organ contours were matched to patient volume data sets and then superimposed on them. These starting contours were then adjusted and refined to rapidly find the organ outline of the given patient. Performance was evaluated by contouring organs of different size, shape complexity, and proximity to surrounding structures. We used representative organs defined on CT volumes obtained from 12 patients and compared the resulting outlines to those drawn by a radiologist. RESULTS A strong correlation was found between the area measures of the delineated liver (r = 0.992), lung (r = 0.996) and spinal cord (r = 0.81), obtained by both segmentation techniques. A paired Student's t-test showed no statistical difference between the two techniques regarding the liver and spinal cord (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION This method could be used to form 'standard' organs, which would form part of a whole body atlas (WBA) database for radiation treatment plans as well as to match atlas organs to new patient data.

[1]  I. Lax,et al.  Specification of Dose Delivery in Radiation Therapy. Recommendations by the Nordic Association of Clinical Physics (NACP). , 1997, Acta oncologica.

[2]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム（マルス）における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[4]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Demonstration of accuracy and clinical versatility of mutual information for automatic multimodality image fusion using affine and thin-plate spline warped geometric deformations , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  V. Spitzer,et al.  The visible human male: a technical report. , 1996, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  Ravi Bansal,et al.  Segmentation of Dynamic N-D Data Sets via Graph Cuts Using Markov Models , 2001, MICCAI.

[7]  Lennart Thurfjell,et al.  A Deformable Atlas of the Chest Based on the Visible Man , 1998 .

[8]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  C Vollmar,et al.  Quantitative comparison of automatic and interactive methods for MRI-SPECT image registration of the brain based on 3-dimensional calculation of error. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Heinz Handels,et al.  Atlas-based segmentation of bone structures to support the virtual planning of hip operations , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Akshay K. Singh,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[12]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  M E Noz,et al.  Fusion of immunoscintigraphy single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with CT of the chest in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 1995, Cancer research.

[14]  Terry E. Weymouth,et al.  Multiple organ definition in CT using a Bayesian approach for 3D model fitting , 1995, Optics & Photonics.

[15]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  J. Damilakis,et al.  Image segmentation in treatment planning for prostate cancer using the region growing technique. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Graphics applied to medical image registration , 1991, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[18]  M. Goitein,et al.  Multi-dimensional treatment planning: II. Beam's eye-view, back projection, and projection through CT sections. , 1983, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Simultaneous usage of homologous points, lines, and planes for optimal, 3-D, linear registration of multimodality imaging data , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[21]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  A Versatile Functional–Anatomic Image Fusion Method for Volume Data Sets , 2001, Journal of Medical Systems.

[22]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[23]  Mubarak Shah,et al.  A Fast algorithm for active contours and curvature estimation , 1992, CVGIP Image Underst..

[24]  M Braun,et al.  Image segmentation by a deformable contour model incorporating region analysis , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  A whole body atlas for segmentation and delineation of organs for radiation therapy planning , 2001 .