Impact of Habitat Complexity on Body Size of Two Spider Species, Alopecosa cuneata and A. pulverulenta (Araneae, Lycosidae), in River Valley Grasslands

Many studies have shown that vegetation structure and habitat complexity affect taxonomic composition, functional diversity, and the number of individuals in spider assemblages. These factors also affect spider body size, but mechanisms responsible for that are still not well understood. In our research, we examined the relationship between the body size of spiders from two species – Alopecosa cuneata and A. pulverulenta – and environmental factors such as habitat type and habitat complexity. Our research was conducted in the Bug River Valley on 12 plots covering three types of habitats: mesic meadow, sandy grassland, and xerothermic grassland. Spiders were collected in 2007-08 from April to mid-November using pitfall traps. In total we measured 334 males and 168 females of Alopecosa cuneata and 315 males and 104 females of A. pulverulenta. The generalized linear mixed model revealed that individuals of Alopecosa cuneata as well as A. pulverulenta reached larger sizes in more complex vegetation, whereas the habitat type did not affect the spider body size. One of the likely mechanisms responsible for a larger body size in more complex habitats is predator pressure. Birds as the main predators of spiders, being selective in their choice of prey, may collect larger spiders with higher intensity than smaller ones. We suggest that more complex habitats with dense vegetation provide better shelter for large spiders, which allows them to avoid predators. Our results indicate that habitat complexity may be an important determinant of body size distribution in spider assemblages.

[1]  L. R. Podgaiski,et al.  Spider community responds to litter complexity: insights from a small-scale experiment in an exotic pine stand , 2017 .

[2]  Maciej Bartos,et al.  Spider Assemblages of Hummocks and Hollows in a Primeval Alder Carr in the Białowieża National Park — Effect of Vegetation Structure and Soil Humidity , 2016, Polish Journal of Ecology.

[3]  F. Molleman,et al.  A comparative perspective on longevity: the effect of body size dominates over ecology in moths , 2016, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[4]  D. Goulson,et al.  Bergmann's Body Size Rule Operates in Facultatively Endothermic Insects: Evidence from a Complex of Cryptic Bumblebee Species , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  S. Wilder,et al.  The postabsorptive and postprandial metabolic rates of praying mantises: Comparisons across species, body masses, and meal sizes. , 2016, Journal of insect physiology.

[6]  A. Joern,et al.  Importance of vegetation structure to the assembly of an aerial web-building spider community in North American open grassland , 2016 .

[7]  V. Wolters,et al.  Intraspecific body size increases with habitat fragmentation in wild bee pollinators , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  C. E. Grelle,et al.  The role of local versus biogeographical processes in influencing diversity and body‐size variation in mammal assemblages , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[9]  V. Zverev,et al.  Factors shaping latitudinal patterns in communities of arboreal spiders in northern Europe , 2015 .

[10]  B. Gunnarsson,et al.  Foraging mode of spiders affects risk of predation by birds , 2015 .

[11]  R. Peters,et al.  Responses of foliage‐living spider assemblage composition and traits to a climatic gradient in Themeda grasslands , 2015 .

[12]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Selective predation by benthivorous fish on stream macroinvertebrates – The role of prey traits and prey abundance , 2015 .

[13]  D. Whitfield,et al.  Age and sex-selective predation moderate the overall impact of predators. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[14]  Vincent Bretagnolle,et al.  Vegetation structure and inter-individual distance affect intake rate and foraging efficiency in a granivorous forager, the Eurasian Skylark Alauda arvensis , 2015, Journal of Ornithology.

[15]  L. Morrell,et al.  Prey body size mediates the predation risk associated with being “odd” , 2015 .

[16]  E. Jeppesen,et al.  Geographical patterns in the body‐size structure of European lake fish assemblages along abiotic and biotic gradients , 2014 .

[17]  V. Jassey,et al.  Habitat type as strongest predictor of the body size distribution of Chydorus sphaericus (O. F. Müller) in small water bodies , 2014 .

[18]  Tomasz Zauski Łąki selernicowe (związek Cnidion dubii Bal.-Tul. 1966) w Polsce [Meadow communities of Cnidion dubii Bal.-Tul. 1966 alliance in Poland] , 2014 .

[19]  P. Tratzi,et al.  Species distribution, ecology, abundance, body size and phylogeny originate interrelated rarity patterns at regional scale , 2013 .

[20]  Gert Berger,et al.  The impact of structural and landscape features of set-asides on the spiders (Araneae) of the herb layer , 2013 .

[21]  P. Kindlmann,et al.  Effect of the canopy complexity of trees on the rate of predation of insects , 2013 .

[22]  Shai Meiri,et al.  An Intercontinental Analysis of Climate-Driven Body Size Clines in Reptiles: No Support for Patterns, No Signals of Processes , 2013, Evolutionary Biology.

[23]  S. Chown,et al.  Scale effects on the body size frequency distributions of African birds: patterns and potential mechanisms , 2013 .

[24]  V. Wolters,et al.  Management intensity and vegetation complexity affect web-building spiders and their prey , 2013, Oecologia.

[25]  R. Cruickshank,et al.  The role of habitat complexity on spider communities in native alpine grasslands of New Zealand , 2013 .

[26]  J. Piñol,et al.  Bird predation affects diurnal and nocturnal web-building spiders in a Mediterranean citrus grove , 2013 .

[27]  A. Schuldt,et al.  Broad‐scale geographic patterns in body size and hind wing development of western Palaearctic carabid beetles(Coleoptera: Carabidae) , 2013 .

[28]  N. Stork,et al.  Body size variation among invertebrates inhabiting different canopy microhabitat: flower visitors are smaller , 2013 .

[29]  C. K. Dodd,et al.  The effect of coachwhip presence on body size of North American racers suggests competition between these sympatric snakes , 2013 .

[30]  J. Macmahon,et al.  An experimental study of spiders in a shrub-steppe ecosystem: the effects of prey availability and shrub architecture , 2012 .

[31]  L. Cook,et al.  Selective bird predation on the peppered moth: the last experiment of Michael Majerus , 2012, Biology Letters.

[32]  D. Moser,et al.  Landscape structure affects activity density, body size and fecundity of Pardosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in winter oilseed rape , 2011 .

[33]  C. Haddad,et al.  Spider assemblages associated with leaf litter of three tree species in central South Africa (Arachnida: Araneae) , 2011 .

[34]  G. Romero,et al.  Bromeliad architectural complexity and vertical distribution predict spider abundance and richness , 2011 .

[35]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Environmental correlates of body size distributions of European springtails (Hexapoda: Collembola) , 2010 .

[36]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Body mass and sex-biased parasitism in wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus , 2010 .

[37]  E. Szymańska,et al.  Body size distribution in Daphnia populations as an effect of prey selectivity by planktivorous fish , 2010, Hydrobiologia.

[38]  R. Brandl,et al.  Body size–climate relationships of European spiders , 2010 .

[39]  V. Růžička,et al.  Variation and diversity of spider assemblages along a thermal gradient in scree slopes and adjacent cliffs , 2010 .

[40]  W. Ulrich,et al.  Body size and biomass distributions of carrion visiting beetles: do cities host smaller species? , 2008, Ecological Research.

[41]  B. Gunnarsson Bird Predation On Spiders: Ecological Mechanisms And Evolutionary Consequences , 2007 .

[42]  J. Spaethe,et al.  Bigger is better: implications of body size for flight ability under different light conditions and the evolution of alloethism in bumblebees , 2007 .

[43]  W. Ulrich Body weight distributions of European Hymenoptera , 2006 .

[44]  Aya Shimazaki,et al.  Variable dependence on detrital and grazing food webs by generalist predators: aerial insects and web spiders , 2005 .

[45]  V. Novotný,et al.  Why are there no small species among xylem-sucking insects? , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[46]  C. Wissel,et al.  A comparison of prey lengths among spiders , 1986, Oecologia.

[47]  W. Nentwig Epigeic spiders, their potential prey and competitors: Relationship between size and frequency , 1982, Oecologia.

[48]  D. Formanowicz,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SIZE, SEX, AND REPRODUCTIVE CONDITION ON THERMAL AND DESICCATION STRESS IN A RIPARIAN SPIDER (PIRATA SEDENTARIUS, ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE) , 2003 .

[49]  S. E. Walker,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and the differential mortality model: is behaviour related to survival? , 2003 .

[50]  A. Moldenke,et al.  Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies , 2000 .

[51]  B. Gunnarsson Bird predation as a sex‐ and size‐selective agent of the arboreal spider Pityohyphantes phrygianus , 1998 .

[52]  B. Gunnarsson Bird predation and vegetation structure affecting spruce-living arthropods in a temperate forest , 1996 .

[53]  B. Gunnarsson,et al.  Spider Abundance in Relation to Needle Density in Spruce , 1994 .

[54]  R. Gillespie,et al.  Spiders in ecological webs , 1993 .

[55]  L. Vincent,et al.  THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE CALIFORNIA TURRET SPIDER ATYPOIDES RIVERSI (ARANEAE, ANTRODIAETIDAE): DEMOGRAPHICS, GROWTH RATES, SURVIVORSHIP, AND LONGEVITY , 1993 .

[56]  G. Parker,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and distorted sex ratios in spiders , 1992, Nature.

[57]  Earl D. McCoy,et al.  Habitat Structure: The Evolution and Diversification of a Complex Topic , 1991 .

[58]  T. Kronestedt Separation of two species standing as Alopecosa aculeata (Clerck) by morphological, behavioural and ecological characters, with remarks on related species in the pulverulenta group (Araneae, Lycosidae) , 1990 .

[59]  R. Shine Ecological Causes for the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism: A Review of the Evidence , 1989, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[60]  J. Ekman,et al.  Impact of some wintering birds on spider abundance in spruce , 1977 .