A sigmoidal transcriptional response: cooperativity, synergy and dosage effects

A sigmoidal transcriptional response (STR) is thought to act as amolecular switch to control gene expression. This nonlinear behaviour arises as a result of the cooperative recognition of a promoter/enhancer by transcription factors (TFs) and/or their synergy to attract the basal transcriptional machinery (BTM). Although this cooperation between TFs is additive in terms of energy, it leads to an exponential increase in affinity between the BTM and the pre‐initiation complexes. This exponential increase in the strength of interactions is the principle that governs synergistic systems. Here, I propose a minimalist quasi‐equilibrium model to explore qualitatively the STR taking into account cooperative recognition of the promoter/enhancer and synergy. Although the focus is on the effect of activators, a similar treatment can be applied to inhibitors. One of the main insights obtained from the model is that generation of a sigmoidal threshold is possible even in the absence of cooperative DNA binding provided the TFs synergistically interact with the BTM. On the contrary, when there is cooperative binding, the impact of synergy diminishes. It will also be shown that a sigmoidal response to a morphogenetic gradient can be used to generate a nested gradient of another morphogen. Previously, I had proposed that halving the amounts of TFs involved in sigmoidal transcriptional switches could account for the abnormal dominant phenotypes associated with some of these genes. This phenomenon, called haploinsufficiency (HI), has been recognised as the basis of many human diseases. Although a formal proof linking HI and a sigmoidal response is lacking, it is tempting to explore the model from the perspective of dosage effects.

[1]  D. Featherstone,et al.  Wrestling with pleiotropy: genomic and topological analysis of the yeast gene expression network. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[2]  R. Veitia,et al.  Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[3]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Estimating coarse gene network structure from large-scale gene perturbation data. , 2002, Genome research.

[4]  I. Lundström,et al.  A model for switch-like phenomena in biological systems. , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[5]  G. Church,et al.  Identifying regulatory networks by combinatorial analysis of promoter elements , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[6]  J. Schmitt,et al.  A Murine Model of Holt-Oram Syndrome Defines Roles of the T-Box Transcription Factor Tbx5 in Cardiogenesis and Disease , 2001, Cell.

[7]  D. Martin,et al.  Transcriptional enhancers--on/off gene regulation as an adaptation to silencing in higher eukaryotic nuclei. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[8]  Ryozo Nagai,et al.  Tbx5 associates with Nkx2-5 and synergistically promotes cardiomyocyte differentiation , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[9]  G. Crabtree,et al.  Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[10]  C. Allis,et al.  Methylation of Histone H4 at Arginine 3 Facilitating Transcriptional Activation by Nuclear Hormone Receptor , 2001, Science.

[11]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[12]  David Valle,et al.  Human disease genes , 2001, Nature.

[13]  M. Yaniv,et al.  An enhanceosome containing the Jun B/Fra‐2 heterodimer and the HMG‐I(Y) architectural protein controls HPV18 transcription , 2000, EMBO reports.

[14]  Dirk Schübeler,et al.  Nuclear compartmentalization and gene activity , 2000, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[15]  E. Richet,et al.  Synergistic transcription activation: a dual role for CRP in the activation of an Escherichia coli promoter depending on MalT and CRP , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[16]  D. Aswad,et al.  Co-operation between protein-acetylating and protein-methylating co-activators in transcriptional activation. , 2000, Biochemical Society transactions.

[17]  C. Klinge,et al.  Comparison of transcriptional synergy of estrogen receptors α and β from multiple tandem estrogen response elements , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[18]  E. Plahte,et al.  Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis. , 2000, Genetics.

[19]  S. Fiering,et al.  To be or not to be active: the stochastic nature of enhancer action. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[20]  N. Patel,et al.  Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element , 2000, Nature.

[21]  C. Klinge,et al.  Comparison of transcriptional synergy of estrogen receptors alpha and beta from multiple tandem estrogen response elements. , 2000, Molecular and cellular endocrinology.

[22]  Mark Groudine,et al.  A Functional Enhancer Suppresses Silencing of a Transgene and Prevents Its Localization Close to Centromeric Heterochromatin , 1999, Cell.

[23]  A. Hochschild,et al.  A genetic method for dissecting the mechanism of transcriptional activator synergy by identical activators. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  Combinatorial codes in signaling and synergy: lessons from pituitary development. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[25]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Genes regulated cooperatively by one or more transcription factors and their identification in whole eukaryotic genomes , 1999, Bioinform..

[26]  Reid C. Johnson,et al.  Multiple Layers of Cooperativity Regulate Enhanceosome-Responsive RNA Polymerase II Transcription Complex Assembly , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  N. McKenna,et al.  Nuclear receptor coactivators: multiple enzymes, multiple complexes, multiple functionsProceedings of Xth International Congress on Hormonal Steroids, Quebec, Canada, 17–21 June 1998. , 1999, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[28]  S. Gasser,et al.  Nuclear compartments and gene regulation. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[29]  Elizabeth A. Winzeler,et al.  Genomic profiling of drug sensitivities via induced haploinsufficiency , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[30]  J Wang,et al.  A mathematical model for synergistic eukaryotic gene activation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Daniel L. Purich,et al.  Handbook of biochemical kinetics , 1999 .

[32]  T M Laue,et al.  Analysis of protein and DNA-mediated contributions to cooperative assembly of protein-DNA complexes. , 1998, Methods.

[33]  N. Patel,et al.  Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. , 1998, Development.

[34]  M. Carey,et al.  Compensatory Energetic Relationships between Upstream Activators and the RNA Polymerase II General Transcription Machinery* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  M. Carey,et al.  The Enhanceosome and Transcriptional Synergy , 1998, Cell.

[36]  D. Durocher,et al.  The cardiac transcription factors Nkx2‐5 and GATA‐4 are mutual cofactors , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[37]  J. Greenblatt,et al.  RNA polymerase II holoenzyme and transcriptional regulation. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[38]  E. Davidson,et al.  The hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems. , 1997, Development.

[39]  K A Dill,et al.  Additivity Principles in Biochemistry* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  R. Kucherlapati,et al.  Mutations in human cause limb and cardiac malformation in Holt-Oram syndrome , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[41]  D. Agard,et al.  Perturbation of Nuclear Architecture by Long-Distance Chromosome Interactions , 1996, Cell.

[42]  G. Gibson,et al.  Epistasis and pleiotropy as natural properties of transcriptional regulation. , 1996, Theoretical population biology.

[43]  R. Roeder Nuclear RNA polymerases: role of general initiation factors and cofactors in eukaryotic transcription. , 1996, Methods in enzymology.

[44]  W. Reardon,et al.  The mutational spectrum in Waardenburg syndrome. , 1994, Human molecular genetics.

[45]  K. Neet Cooperativity in enzyme function: equilibrium and kinetic aspects. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[46]  M. Kerszberg,et al.  A model for reading morphogenetic gradients: autocatalysis and competition at the gene level. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  K. Parker,et al.  A cell-specific nuclear receptor is essential for adrenal and gonadal development and sexual differentiation , 1994, Cell.

[48]  A. Wilkie,et al.  The molecular basis of genetic dominance. , 1994, Journal of medical genetics.

[49]  D. Blanc [What is the dose?]. , 1994, Journal de radiologie.

[50]  Pedro Mendes,et al.  GEPASI: a software package for modelling the dynamics, steady states and control of biochemical and other systems , 1993, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[51]  David Housman,et al.  WT-1 is required for early kidney development , 1993, Cell.

[52]  I. M. Klotz A perspective into ligand-receptor affinities using complex numbers. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  M. Carey,et al.  Transcriptional synergy by the Epstein-Barr virus transactivator ZEBRA , 1992, Journal of virology.

[54]  P. Herbomel Synergistic activation of eukaryotic transcription: the multiacceptor target hypothesis. , 1990, The New biologist.

[55]  M. Ko,et al.  The dose dependence of glucocorticoid‐inducible gene expression results from changes in the number of transcriptionally active templates. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[56]  Michael Carey,et al.  How different eukaryotic transcriptional activators can cooperate promiscuously , 1990, Nature.

[57]  B. O’Malley,et al.  Cooperative binding of steroid hormone receptors contributes to transcriptional synergism at target enhancer elements , 1989, Cell.

[58]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos , 1988, Cell.

[59]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centres , 1988, Nature.

[60]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Factors involved in specific transcription by mammalian RNA polymerase II. Purification and functional analysis of initiation factors IIB and IIE. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[61]  Donald F. Senear,et al.  [9] Quantitative DNase footprint titration: A method for studying protein-DNA interactions , 1986 .

[62]  M. A. Shea,et al.  Quantitative DNase footprint titration: a method for studying protein-DNA interactions. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[63]  M. Ptashne A Genetic Switch , 1986 .

[64]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  W. Jencks,et al.  On the attribution and additivity of binding energies. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  S. Spragg Biophysical chemistry , 1979, Nature.

[67]  Bruce Alberts,et al.  The interaction of estradiol-receptor protein with the genome: an argument for the existence of undetected specific sites , 1975, Cell.

[68]  Syr-yaung Lin,et al.  The general affinity of lac repressor for E. coli DNA: Implications for gene regulation in procaryotes and eucaryotes , 1975, Cell.

[69]  D. Koshland,et al.  A general method for the quantitative determination of saturation curves for multisubunit proteins. , 1970, Biochemistry.

[70]  L. Wolpert Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[71]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[72]  F. G. Young Enzymes , 1951 .

[73]  G. Adair THE HEMOGLOBIN SYSTEM VI. THE OXYGEN DISSOCIATION CURVE OF HEMOGLOBIN , 1925 .