Injury differences between small and large overlap frontal crashes.

Because small overlap impacts have recently emerged as a crash mode posing great injury risk to occupants, a detailed analysis of US crash data was conducted using the NASS/CDS and CIREN databases. Frontal crashes were subcategorized into small overlap impact (SOI) and large overlap impact (LOI) using crash and crush characteristics from the datasets. Injuries to head, spine, chest, hip and pelvis, and lower extremities were parsed and compared between crash types. MAIS 3+ occupants in NASS/CDS and CIREN demonstrated increased incidence of head, chest, spine, and hip/pelvis injuries in SOI compared to LOI. In NASS/CDS, subgaleal hematoma represented 48.6% of SOI head injury codes but 27.6% in LOI. Cervical spine posterior element fractures also represented greater proportions of SOI spine injuries (e.g., facet fractures: 27.8 vs. 14.0%), and proximal femur fractures represented a greater proportion of hip/pelvis injuries (e.g., intertrochanteric fracture: 32.5 vs. 11.8%). Tarsal/metatarsal fractures were a lesser proportion of lower extremity injuries in SOI compared to LOI. Occupant contact points inducing these injuries were observed in CIREN cases in some instances without compartment intrusion. These injuries suggest the substantial role of occupant kinematics in SOI which may induce suboptimal occupant restraint interaction.

[1]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Thoracic Trauma Assessment Formulations for Restrained Drivers in Simulated Frontal Impacts , 1994 .

[2]  Brian N. Fildes,et al.  Lower extremity risk and harm associated with narrow offset frontal impact crashes , 2007 .

[3]  John R. Brophy,et al.  An Overview of Nhtsa ’ S Crash Reconstruction Software , 2007 .

[4]  Richard Frampton,et al.  APPROPRIATE FRONTAL BARRIER TESTS FOR RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS , 1993 .

[5]  Mats O Lindquist,et al.  Kinematics of belted fatalities in frontal collisions: A new approach in deep studies of injury mechanisms. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  Mark Mynatt,et al.  Fatalities in frontal crashes despite seat belts and air bags: September 2009 review of all CDS cases: model and calendar years 2000-2007: 122 fatalities , 2009 .

[7]  Frank A. Pintar,et al.  An Operational Definition of Small Overlap Impact for Published NASS Data , 2011 .

[8]  Elisa R Braver,et al.  Deaths among Drivers and Right-Front Passengers in Frontal Collisions: Redesigned Air Bags Relative to First-Generation Air Bags , 2008, Traffic injury prevention.

[9]  Joseph M. Nolan,et al.  Characteristics of Small Overlap Crashes , 2009 .

[10]  Hans Norin,et al.  Severe Frontal Collisions with Partial Overlap - Significance, Test Methods and Car Design , 1993 .

[11]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Injury mechanisms and severity in narrow offset frontal impacts. , 2008, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[12]  J. Cusick,et al.  Biomechanics of the cervical spine 4: major injuries. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  R H Eppinger,et al.  Mechanisms and factors involved in hip injuries during frontal crashes. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[14]  Donald F. Huelke,et al.  Offset Frontal Collisions: A Review of the Literature and Analysis of UMTRI and NASS Crash Injury Data - CDC, AIS and Body Area Injuries , 1995 .

[15]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Analysis of Thoracic Loading, Kinematics, and Injuries in Small Overlap Impacts: Field Data and Full-Scale Vehicle Tests with Dummies , 2011 .

[16]  H C Gabler,et al.  The accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates: the influence of vehicle type, stiffness, and impact mode. , 2006, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[17]  Brian O'Neill,et al.  Offset frontal impacts: a comparison of real-world crashes with laboratory tests , 1994 .

[18]  Mats Lindquist,et al.  Real world car crash investigations — A new approach , 2003 .