Effects of Task Type and Wall Appearance on Collision Behavior in Virtual Environments

Driven by the games community, virtual reality setups have lately evolved into affordable and consumer-ready mobile headsets. However, despite these promising improvements, it remains challenging to convey immersive and engaging VR games as players are usually limited to experience the virtual world by vision and hearing only. One prominent example of such open challenges is the disparity between the real surroundings and the virtual environment. As virtual obstacles usually do not have a physical counterpart, players might walk through walls enclosing the level. Thus, past research mainly focussed on multisensory collision feedback to deter players from ignoring obstacles. However, the underlying causative reasons for such unwanted behavior have mostly remained unclear. Our work investigates how task types and wall appearances influence the players' incentives to walk through virtual walls. Therefore, we conducted a user study, confronting the participants with different task motivations and walls of varying opacity and realism. Our evaluation reveals that players generally adhere to realistic behavior, as long as the experience feels interesting and diverse. Furthermore, we found that opaque walls excel in deterring subjects from cutting short, whereas different degrees of realism had no significant influence on walking trajectories. Finally, we use collected player feedback to discuss individual reasons for the observed behavior.

[1]  Thomas W. Schubert Decomposing the sense of presence : Factor analytic insights , 1999 .

[2]  Kristopher J. Blom,et al.  Virtual collision notification , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[3]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[4]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Passive haptics significantly enhances virtual environments , 2001 .

[5]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  Redirected Walking , 2001, Eurographics.

[6]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  Using a vibro-tactile display for enhanced collision perception and presence , 2004, VRST '04.

[7]  Eyal Ofek,et al.  RealityCheck: Blending Virtual Environments with Situated Physical Reality , 2019, CHI.

[8]  Mel Slater,et al.  Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Pedro Lopes,et al.  Providing Haptics to Walls & Heavy Objects in Virtual Reality by Means of Electrical Muscle Stimulation , 2017, CHI.

[10]  Maud Marchal,et al.  Kinematic Evaluation of Virtual Walking Trajectories , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Mel Slater,et al.  A Virtual Presence Counter , 2000, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  The benefits of using a walking interface to navigate virtual environments , 2009, TCHI.

[13]  Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al.  Substitutional Reality: Using the Physical Environment to Design Virtual Reality Experiences , 2015, CHI.

[14]  Carme Torras,et al.  3D collision detection: a survey , 2001, Comput. Graph..

[15]  Ifigeneia Mavridou,et al.  Altering User Movement Behaviour in Virtual Environments , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Patricia S. Denbrook,et al.  Virtual Locomotion: Walking in Place through Virtual Environments , 1999, Presence.

[17]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[18]  Mar Gonzalez-Franco,et al.  Locomotion Vault: the Extra Mile in Analyzing VR Locomotion Techniques , 2021, CHI.

[19]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Learning to walk in virtual reality , 2013, TAP.

[20]  Takuji Narumi,et al.  Do You Feel Like Passing Through Walls?: Effect of Self-Avatar Appearance on Facilitating Realistic Behavior in Virtual Environments , 2020, CHI.

[21]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[22]  Costas Boletsis,et al.  The New Era of Virtual Reality Locomotion: A Systematic Literature Review of Techniques and a Proposed Typology , 2017, Multimodal Technol. Interact..

[23]  Philip W. Fink,et al.  Obstacle avoidance during walking in real and virtual environments , 2007, TAP.

[24]  David Moore,et al.  HCI Lessons From PlayStation VR , 2017, CHI PLAY.

[25]  Mary C. Whitton,et al.  Evaluation of Reorientation Techniques and Distractors for Walking in Large Virtual Environments , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  Steffi Beckhaus,et al.  How to not hit a virtual wall: aural spatial awareness for collision avoidance in virtual environments , 2011, AM '11.

[27]  M. Arditti Unity , 1957, Journal of the Irish Medical Association.

[28]  Sharif Razzaque,et al.  The Hand Is More Easily Fooled than the Eye: Users Are More Sensitive to Visual Interpenetration than to Visual-Proprioceptive Discrepancy , 2006, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[29]  Koren Ward,et al.  Electro-tactile feedback system to enhance virtual reality experience , 2016 .

[30]  Rainer Malaka,et al.  You Shall Not Pass: Non-Intrusive Feedback for Virtual Walls in VR Environments with Room-Scale Mapping , 2018, 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR).

[31]  Mel Slater,et al.  Visual Realism Enhances Realistic Response in an Immersive Virtual Environment , 2009, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[32]  Eyal Ofek,et al.  Haptic Retargeting: Dynamic Repurposing of Passive Haptics for Enhanced Virtual Reality Experiences , 2016, CHI.

[33]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Collision Awareness Using Vibrotactile Arrays , 2007, 2007 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[34]  Michael Lewis,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Three Methods for Collision Handling in Virtual Environments , 1997 .

[35]  Pedro Lopes,et al.  Impacto: Simulating Physical Impact by Combining Tactile Stimulation with Electrical Muscle Stimulation , 2015, UIST.