Supervised machine learning of ultracold atoms with speckle disorder
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. A. Fedorenko,et al. Density of states in an optical speckle potential , 2010, 1008.0589.
[2] D. Delande,et al. Mobility edge for cold atoms in laser speckle potentials. , 2014, Physical review letters.
[3] David Ryan Koes,et al. Protein-Ligand Scoring with Convolutional Neural Networks , 2016, Journal of chemical information and modeling.
[4] G V Shlyapnikov,et al. Anderson localization of expanding Bose-Einstein condensates in random potentials. , 2006, Physical review letters.
[5] S. Pilati,et al. Anderson localization in optical lattices with correlated disorder , 2015, 1510.05121.
[6] Cícero Nogueira dos Santos,et al. Boosting Docking-Based Virtual Screening with Deep Learning , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[7] A. Aspect,et al. Direct observation of Anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder , 2008, Nature.
[8] Klaus-Robert Müller,et al. Assessment and Validation of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Molecular Atomization Energies. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[9] J. Behler. Atom-centered symmetry functions for constructing high-dimensional neural network potentials. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.
[10] Edgar A. Engel,et al. Ab initio thermodynamics of liquid and solid water , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] Sebastian Johann Wetzel,et al. Unsupervised learning of phase transitions: from principal component analysis to variational autoencoders , 2017, Physical review. E.
[12] J. Goodman. Speckle Phenomena in Optics: Theory and Applications , 2020 .
[13] Klaus-Robert Müller,et al. Finding Density Functionals with Machine Learning , 2011, Physical review letters.
[14] B. Demarco,et al. Three-Dimensional Anderson Localization of Ultracold Matter , 2011, Science.
[15] E. Demler,et al. A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet , 2017, Nature.
[16] P. Marko,et al. ABSENCE OF DIFFUSION IN CERTAIN RANDOM LATTICES , 2008 .
[17] A. Aspect,et al. Three-dimensional localization of ultracold atoms in an optical disordered potential , 2011, Nature Physics.
[18] Li Li,et al. Understanding Machine-learned Density Functionals , 2014, ArXiv.
[19] Li Li,et al. Bypassing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning , 2016, Nature Communications.
[20] A. Aspect,et al. Anderson localization of ultracold atoms , 2009 .
[21] Qiang Yang,et al. A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
[22] J. Dalibard,et al. Many-Body Physics with Ultracold Gases , 2007, 0704.3011.
[23] Alexandre Tkatchenko,et al. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks , 2016, Nature Communications.
[24] Steven D. Brown,et al. Neural network models of potential energy surfaces , 1995 .
[25] Kristof T. Schütt,et al. How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: Towards fast prediction of electronic properties , 2013, 1307.1266.
[26] Christopher. Simons,et al. Machine learning with Python , 2017 .
[27] T. Ohtsuki,et al. Deep Learning the Quantum Phase Transitions in Random Electron Systems: Applications to Three Dimensions , 2016, 1612.04909.
[28] K. Müller,et al. Machine Learning Predictions of Molecular Properties: Accurate Many-Body Potentials and Nonlocality in Chemical Space , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[29] Kyle Mills,et al. Deep learning and the Schrödinger equation , 2017, ArXiv.
[30] Dong-Ling Deng,et al. Machine Learning Topological States , 2016, 1609.09060.
[31] G. Carleo,et al. Symmetries and Many-Body Excitations with Neural-Network Quantum States. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[32] R. Kondor,et al. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. , 2009, Physical review letters.
[33] P. Anderson,et al. Scaling Theory of Localization: Absence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions , 1979 .
[34] Michele Parrinello,et al. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. , 2007, Physical review letters.
[35] Felix M. Izrailev,et al. LOCALIZATION AND THE MOBILITY EDGE IN ONE-DIMENSIONAL POTENTIALS WITH CORRELATED DISORDER , 1999 .
[36] John C. Snyder,et al. Orbital-free bond breaking via machine learning. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.
[37] J. Behler. Neural network potential-energy surfaces in chemistry: a tool for large-scale simulations. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[38] Lei Wang,et al. Discovering phase transitions with unsupervised learning , 2016, 1606.00318.
[39] R. Melko,et al. Machine Learning Phases of Strongly Correlated Fermions , 2016, Physical Review X.
[40] Semiclassical spectral function and density of states in speckle potentials , 2016, 1606.02156.
[41] Sandro Stringari,et al. Theory of ultracold atomic Fermi gases , 2007, 0706.3360.
[42] Pedro J. Ballester,et al. Performance of machine-learning scoring functions in structure-based virtual screening , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[43] P. Popelier,et al. Potential energy surfaces fitted by artificial neural networks. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. A.
[44] J. Goodman. Statistical Properties of Laser Speckle Patterns , 1963 .
[45] Marcos Rigol,et al. Observation of spatial charge and spin correlations in the 2D Fermi-Hubbard model , 2016, Science.
[46] A. Gross,et al. Representing high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces for reactions at surfaces by neural networks , 2004 .
[47] A. Aspect,et al. One-Dimensional Anderson Localization in Certain Correlated Random Potentials , 2009, 0902.0107.
[48] Roger G. Melko,et al. Machine learning phases of matter , 2016, Nature Physics.
[49] Michael Knap,et al. Classifying snapshots of the doped Hubbard model with machine learning , 2018, Nature Physics.
[50] David A. Huse,et al. Observation of antiferromagnetic correlations in the Hubbard model with ultracold atoms , 2014, Nature.
[51] Gaël Varoquaux,et al. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[52] P. Zoller,et al. The cold atom Hubbard toolbox , 2004, cond-mat/0410614.
[53] Symmetries and many-body excited states with neural-network quantum states , 2018 .
[54] J. Behler. Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. , 2016, The Journal of chemical physics.
[55] E. M. Inack,et al. Projective quantum Monte Carlo simulations guided by unrestricted neural network states , 2018, Physical Review B.
[56] J M Huntley. Speckle photography fringe analysis: assessment of current algorithms. , 1989, Applied optics.
[57] Massimo Inguscio,et al. Anderson localization of a non-interacting Bose–Einstein condensate , 2008, Nature.
[58] M. Lukin,et al. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator , 2017, Nature.
[59] S. Pilati,et al. Anderson localization of matter waves in quantum-chaos theory , 2015, 1503.04332.
[60] Dumitru Erhan,et al. Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrapping , 2014, ICLR.
[61] Nir Shavit,et al. Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noise , 2017, ArXiv.
[62] Walid Gomaa,et al. Machine learning in computational docking , 2015, Artif. Intell. Medicine.
[63] G. Modugno. Anderson localization in Bose–Einstein condensates , 2010, 1009.0555.
[64] Guigang Zhang,et al. Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..
[65] Jimmy Ba,et al. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.
[66] Matthias Troyer,et al. Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks , 2016, Science.
[67] S. Huber,et al. Learning phase transitions by confusion , 2016, Nature Physics.
[68] Carlo Baldassi,et al. Efficiency of quantum vs. classical annealing in nonconvex learning problems , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.