Barcoded microbial system for high-resolution object provenance

DNA barcodes in small packages Under adverse environmental conditions, some microorganisms form spores that provide robust protection for genetic material. Qian et al. developed a system in which DNA barcodes are encapsulated inside nongerminating microbial spores and can be dispersed on objects or in the environment (see the Perspective by Nivala). These barcoded spores provide a durable, specific marker that can be read out quickly with simple equipment. When applied to soil, the spores can be transferred to and from objects around them, enabling tracking at meter-scale resolution. On plant leaves, the spores are not readily transferred, and the authors demonstrate a potential use for tracking agricultural products. Science, this issue p. 1135; see also p. 1058 Rapid, sensitive, specific, and scalable object provenance with barcoded microbial spores. Determining where an object has been is a fundamental challenge for human health, commerce, and food safety. Location-specific microbes in principle offer a cheap and sensitive way to determine object provenance. We created a synthetic, scalable microbial spore system that identifies object provenance in under 1 hour at meter-scale resolution and near single-spore sensitivity and can be safely introduced into and recovered from the environment. This system solves the key challenges in object provenance: persistence in the environment, scalability, rapid and facile decoding, and biocontainment. Our system is compatible with SHERLOCK, a Cas13a RNA-guided nucleic acid detection assay, facilitating its implementation in a wide range of applications.

[1]  T. Ravinder,et al.  Cost-effective production of Bacillus thuringiensis by solid-state fermentation. , 2005, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[2]  Xiyan Li,et al.  Dynamic Human Environmental Exposome Revealed by Longitudinal Personal Monitoring , 2018, Cell.

[3]  Daniel Patrick Smith,et al.  Forensic analysis of the microbiome of phones and shoes , 2015, Microbiome.

[4]  Marco Galardini,et al.  Construction and Analysis of Two Genome-Scale Deletion Libraries for Bacillus subtilis. , 2017, Cell systems.

[5]  C. Bertozzi,et al.  Identification of new components of the RipC-FtsEX cell separation pathway of Corynebacterineae , 2019, PLoS genetics.

[6]  Dan Knights,et al.  Systematic improvement of amplicon marker gene methods for increased accuracy in microbiome studies , 2016, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  P. Schaeffer,et al.  Catabolic repression of bacterial sporulation. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Rob Knight,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of microbial interaction between humans and the indoor environment , 2014, Science.

[9]  C. Gross,et al.  MurJ and a novel lipid II flippase are required for cell wall biogenesis in Bacillus subtilis , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Nunzianda Frascione,et al.  Taggant materials in forensic science: A review , 2016 .

[11]  R. Twyman,et al.  Bacillus thuringiensis: a century of research, development and commercial applications. , 2011, Plant biotechnology journal.

[12]  Sarah E. Katoski,et al.  Genetic Barcodes for Improved Environmental Tracking of an Anthrax Simulant , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  A. Lane,et al.  Re‐aerosolization of Bacillus thuringiensis spores from concrete and turf , 2017, Letters in applied microbiology.

[14]  Jacqueline M. Bloemhof,et al.  Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains - Current status and challenges , 2011, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[15]  Donald J. Sharp,et al.  Timeliness of Enteric Disease Surveillance in 6 US States , 2008, Emerging infectious diseases.

[16]  L. Klobutcher,et al.  The Bacillus subtilis spore coat provides "eat resistance" during phagocytic predation by the protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2 , 2017, Science.

[18]  Paul J. McMurdie,et al.  DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[19]  R. Tauxe,et al.  Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--unspecified agents. , 2011, Emerging infectious diseases.

[20]  Francesco Asnicar,et al.  Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2 , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  M. Sarwat,et al.  DNA barcoding, microarrays and next generation sequencing: recent tools for genetic diversity estimation and authentication of medicinal plants , 2016, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[22]  James F. Meadow,et al.  Microbiota of the indoor environment: a meta-analysis , 2015, Microbiome.

[23]  Jason M. Edmonds,et al.  Detection and Tracking of a Novel Genetically Tagged Biological Simulant in the Environment , 2012, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[24]  Fengzhu Sun,et al.  Variance adjusted weighted UniFrac: a powerful beta diversity measure for comparing communities based on phylogeny , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[25]  P. Setlow,et al.  Experimental studies addressing the longevity of Bacillus subtilis spores – The first data from a 500-year experiment , 2018, PloS one.

[26]  Max G Schubert,et al.  Efficient Multiplexed Integration of Synergistic Alleles and Metabolic Pathways in Yeasts via CRISPR-Cas. , 2015, Cell systems.