The effects of task demands on bimanual skill acquisition

Bimanual coordination is essential for everyday activities. It is thought that different degrees of demands may affect learning of new bimanual patterns. One demand is at the level of performance and involves breaking the tendency to produce mirror-symmetric movements. A second is at a perceptual level and involves controlling each hand to separate (i.e., split) goals. A third demand involves switching between different task contexts (e.g., a different uni- or bimanual task), instead of continuously practicing one task repeatedly. Here, we studied the effect of these task demands on motor planning (reaction time) and execution (error) while subjects learned a novel bimanual isometric pinch force task. In Experiment 1, subjects continuously practiced in one of the two extremes of the following bimanual conditions: (1) symmetric force demands and a perceptually unified target for each hand or (2) asymmetric force demands and perceptually split targets. Subjects performing in the asymmetric condition showed some interference between hands, but all subjects, regardless of group, could learn the isometric pinch force task similarly. In Experiment 2, subjects practiced these and two other conditions, but in a paradigm where practice was briefly interrupted by the performance of either a unimanual or a different bimanual condition. Reaction times were longer and errors were larger well after the interruption when the main movement to be learned required asymmetric forces. There was no effect when the main movement required symmetric forces. These findings demonstrate two main points. First, people can learn bimanual tasks with very different demands on the same timescale if they are not interrupted. Second, interruption during learning can negatively impact both planning and execution and this depends on the demands of the bimanual task to be learned. This information will be important for training patient populations, who may be more susceptible to increased task demands.

[1]  K. Newell,et al.  Dependence of asymmetrical interference on task demands and hand dominance in bimanual isometric force tasks , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[3]  P Viviani,et al.  Cerebral dominance and asynchrony between bimanual two-dimensional movements. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  C. A. Wood,et al.  The role of interference and task similarity on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of simple motor skills. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[5]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Structural Constraints on the Performance of Symmetrical Bimanual Movements with Different Amplitudes , 1995 .

[6]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Functional connectivity of cortical networks involved in bimanual motor sequence learning. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Kelvin E. Jones,et al.  Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[11]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Production of polyrhythms. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Dual-task interference during initial learning of a new motor task results from competition for the same brain areas , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Deborah J. Serrien,et al.  Interactions between new and pre-existing dynamics in bimanual movement control , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[15]  Stephan Riek,et al.  Hierarchical organisation of neuro-anatomical constraints in interlimb coordination. , 2005, Human movement science.

[16]  T D Lee,et al.  Acquiring bimanual skills: contrasting forms of information feedback for interlimb decoupling. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  M. Peters,et al.  Constraints in the performance of bimanual tasks and their expression in unskilled and skilled subjects , 1985 .

[18]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[20]  J. Summers,et al.  Practice and Training in Bimanual Coordination Tasks: Strategies and Constraints , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Bimanual coordination and interhemispheric interaction. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[22]  J Whitall,et al.  Accuracy of dynamic isometric force production: the influence of age and bimanual activation patters. , 2000, Motor control.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  K. Pearson,et al.  Long-Lasting Working Memories of Obstacles Established by Foreleg Stepping in Walking Cats Require Area 5 of the Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Patterns of interference in sequence learning and prism adaptation inconsistent with the consolidation hypothesis. , 2002, Learning & memory.

[26]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Spatial Conceptual Influences on the Coordination of Bimanual Actions: When a Dual Task Becomes a Single Task , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination , 2001, Nature.

[29]  Franz Mechsner,et al.  Response to Commentaries: Actions as Perceptual-Conceptual "Gestalts" , 2004 .

[30]  C. MacKenzie,et al.  Bimanual Movement Control: Information processing and Interaction Effects , 1984 .

[31]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.

[32]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task. , 1991, Acta psychologica.

[33]  A Belger,et al.  Costs and benefits of integrating information between the cerebral hemispheres: a computational perspective. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[34]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Bimanual interference associated with the selection of target locations. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Carol A. Putnam,et al.  On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  R. Ivry,et al.  Moving to Directly Cued Locations Abolishes Spatial Interference During Bimanual Actions , 2001, Psychological science.

[37]  Iring Koch,et al.  Inhibition of response mode in task switching. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[38]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Dissociation of Spatial and Temporal Coupling in the Bimanual Movements of Callosotomy Patients , 1996 .

[39]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  D Gopher,et al.  Switching tasks and attention policies. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[43]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Bimanual coordination affects motor task switching , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  C. Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 1987, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  Nicole Wenderoth,et al.  Parieto-premotor areas mediate directional interference during bimanual movements. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Sang Ho Ahn,et al.  Bilateral primary sensori‐motor cortex activation of post‐stroke mirror movements: an fMRI study , 2003, Neuroreport.

[47]  Robert S. McCormick,et al.  Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  W. Brown,et al.  Callosal Function in Multiple Sclerosis: Bimanual Motor Coordination , 2002, Cortex.

[49]  Franz Mechsner,et al.  A Psychological Approach to Human Voluntary Movements , 2004 .

[50]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Bimanual coordination and corpus callosum microstructure in young adults with traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. , 2010, Journal of neurotrauma.

[51]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Hannah J. Block,et al.  Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored? , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  W. Verwey,et al.  The effect of continuous, nonlinearly transformed visual feedback on rapid aiming movements , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Doing two things at once: The role of temporal compatibility , 1979 .

[55]  Will Spijkers,et al.  The time course of cross-talk during the simultaneous specification of bimanual movement amplitudes , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  S. Kilbreath,et al.  Frequency of hand use in healthy older persons. , 2005, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[57]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[58]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  S. Cardoso de Oliveira,et al.  Visual feedback reduces bimanual coupling of movement amplitudes, but not of directions , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[60]  S. Monsell Task-set reconfiguration processes do not imply a control homunuculus: Reply to Altmann , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Bimanual coupling during the specification of isometric forces , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  Eric L. Amazeen,et al.  The effects of attention and handedness on coordination dynamics in a bimanual Fitts’ law task , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[64]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[65]  D. Serrien Coordination constraints during bimanual versus unimanual performance conditions , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Between-limb asynchronies during bimanual coordination: Effects of manual dominance and attentional cueing , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[67]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions , 1997 .

[68]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: specification interference as revealed by reaction time , 1997 .

[69]  F. Mechsner A psychological approach to human voluntary movement. , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[70]  A. Dove,et al.  Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[71]  C. E. Peper,et al.  Bimanual coordination between isometric contractions and rhythmic movements: an asymmetric coupling , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[72]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Two hands, one brain: cognitive neuroscience of bimanual skill , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  R. Ivry,et al.  Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters , 2003, Psychological research.

[74]  I. Koch,et al.  The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  E. Franz,et al.  Attentional Distribution of Task Parameters to the Two Hands During Bimanual Performance of Right- and Left-Handers , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[76]  R. Ivry,et al.  Independent on‐line control of the two hands during bimanual reaching , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[77]  Baptist Liefooghe,et al.  Working memory costs of task switching. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[78]  G P Bingham,et al.  Visual perception of mean relative phase and phase variability. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[79]  J. Diedrichsen,et al.  Responsibility Assignment in Redundant Systems , 2010, Current Biology.

[80]  A. Sillito,et al.  Spatial organization and magnitude of orientation contrast interactions in primate V1. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[81]  T D Lee,et al.  Contextual interference in learning new patterns of bimanual coordination. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.