Enhanced sampling of protein conformational states for dynamic cross‐docking within the protein‐protein docking server SwarmDock

The formation of specific protein‐protein interactions is often a key to a protein's function. During complex formation, each protein component will undergo a change in the conformational state, for some these changes are relatively small and reside primarily at the sidechain level; however, others may display notable backbone adjustments. One of the classic problems in the protein‐docking field is to be able to a priori predict the extent of such conformational changes. In this work, we investigated three protocols to find the most suitable input structure conformations for cross‐docking, including a robust sampling approach in normal mode space. Counterintuitively, knowledge of the theoretically best combination of normal modes for unbound‐bound transitions does not always lead to the best results. We used a novel spatial partitioning library, Aether Engine (see Supplementary Materials ), to efficiently search the conformational states of 56 receptor/ligand pairs, including a recent CAPRI target, in a systematic manner and selected diverse conformations as input to our automated docking server, SwarmDock, a server that allows moderate conformational adjustments during the docking process. In essence, here we present a dynamic cross‐docking protocol, which when benchmarked against the simpler approach of just docking the unbound components shows a 10% uplift in the quality of the top docking pose.

[1]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  Distance‐scaled, finite ideal‐gas reference state improves structure‐derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .

[3]  Marcin Król,et al.  Implicit flexibility in protein docking: Cross‐docking and local refinement , 2007, Proteins.

[4]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: Current status of docking methods , 2003, Proteins.

[5]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Computing the Dynamic Supramolecular Structural Proteome , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Mieczyslaw Torchala,et al.  SwarmDock: a server for flexible protein-protein docking , 2013, Bioinform..

[7]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[8]  Roger J.-B. Wets,et al.  Minimization by Random Search Techniques , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[9]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  A physical reference state unifies the structure‐derived potential of mean force for protein folding and binding , 2004, Proteins.

[10]  Raphael A. G. Chaleil,et al.  Updates to the Integrated Protein-Protein Interaction Benchmarks: Docking Benchmark Version 5 and Affinity Benchmark Version 2. , 2015, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.

[13]  M. Nilges,et al.  Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. , 2004, Structure.

[14]  Han Remaut,et al.  Helicobacter pylori adhesin HopQ disrupts trans dimerization in human CEACAMs , 2018, The EMBO journal.

[15]  Simon Mitternacht,et al.  FreeSASA: An open source C library for solvent accessible surface area calculations , 2016, F1000Research.

[16]  Yang Shen,et al.  cNMA: a framework of encounter complex-based normal mode analysis to model conformational changes in protein interactions , 2015, Bioinform..

[17]  Sergei Grudinin,et al.  NOLB: Nonlinear Rigid Block Normal-Mode Analysis Method. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[18]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[19]  P. Bates,et al.  SwarmDock and the Use of Normal Modes in Protein-Protein Docking , 2010, International journal of molecular sciences.

[20]  Vishwesh Venkatraman,et al.  Flexible protein docking refinement using pose‐dependent normal mode analysis , 2012, Proteins.

[21]  M. Sternberg,et al.  The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  H. Wolfson,et al.  FiberDock: Flexible induced‐fit backbone refinement in molecular docking , 2010, Proteins.

[23]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[24]  Mieczyslaw Torchala,et al.  Predicting the structure of protein-protein complexes using the SwarmDock Web Server. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[25]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Describing Biological Protein Interactions in Terms of Protein States and State Transitions , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[26]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3–5 shows progress in docking procedures , 2005, Proteins.

[27]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Energy minimization in low‐frequency normal modes to efficiently allow for global flexibility during systematic protein–protein docking , 2008, Proteins.

[28]  Karsten Suhre,et al.  ElNémo: a normal mode web server for protein movement analysis and the generation of templates for molecular replacement , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[31]  S. Wodak,et al.  Modeling protein–protein and protein–peptide complexes: CAPRI 6th edition , 2017, Proteins.

[32]  Tammy M. K. Cheng,et al.  pyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid‐body protein–protein docking , 2007, Proteins.

[33]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking. , 2016, Structure.