Combining global climate and regional landscape models to improve prediction of invasion risk

Aim It is widely acknowledged that species distributions result from a variety of biotic and abiotic factors operating at different spatial scales. Here, we aimed to (1) determine the extent to which global climate niche models (CNMs) can be improved by the addition of fine-scale regional data; (2) examine climatic and environmental factors influencing the range of 15 invasive aquatic plant species; and (3) provide a case study for the use of such models in invasion management on an island. Location Global, with a case study of species invasions in Ireland. Methods Climate niche models of global extent (including climate only) and regional environmental niche models (with additional factors such as human influence, land use and soil characteristics) were generated using maxent for 15 invasive aquatic plants. The performance of these models within the invaded range of the study species in Ireland was assessed, and potential hotspots of invasion suitability were determined. Models were projected forward up to 2080 based on two climate scenarios. Results While climate variables are important in defining the global range of species, factors related to land use and nutrient level were of greater importance in regional projections. Global climatic models were significantly improved at the island scale by the addition of fine-scale environmental variables (area under the curve values increased by 0.18 and true skill statistic values by 0.36), and projected ranges decreased from an average of 86% to 36% of the island. Main conclusions Refining CNMs with regional data on land use, human influence and landscape may have a substantial impact on predictive capacity, providing greater value for prioritization of conservation management at subregional or local scales.

[1]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  The art of modelling range‐shifting species , 2010 .

[2]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges , 2003 .

[3]  M. Luoto,et al.  Climate change and the future distributions of aquatic macrophytes across boreal catchments , 2011 .

[4]  J. Dukes,et al.  Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[5]  Catherine S. Jarnevich,et al.  Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species , 2008 .

[6]  B. Huntley,et al.  The relative importance of climate and habitat in determining the distributions of species at different spatial scales: a case study with ground beetles in Great Britain , 2012 .

[7]  M. Kearney,et al.  Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species' ranges. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[8]  Jason C. White,et al.  Species richness of both native and invasive aquatic plants influenced by environmental conditions and human activity , 2009 .

[9]  Zhongwei Guo,et al.  Increasing Potential Risk of a Global Aquatic Invader in Europe in Contrast to Other Continents under Future Climate Change , 2011, PloS one.

[10]  J. Kollmann,et al.  Predicting the distribution of the invasive alien Heracleum mantegazzianum at two different spatial scales , 2008 .

[11]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Presence‐only modelling using MAXENT: when can we trust the inferences? , 2013 .

[12]  Alberto Jiménez-Valverde,et al.  Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling , 2008 .

[13]  J. Wiens,et al.  Taxon-dependent Scaling: Beetles, Birds, and Vegetation at Four North American Grassland Sites , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  J. Franklin,et al.  Differences in spatial predictions among species distribution modeling methods vary with species traits and environmental predictors , 2009 .

[15]  D. Richardson,et al.  Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale , 2005, Global change biology.

[16]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[17]  B. Graae,et al.  A hierarchical framework for integrating invasibility experiments incorporating different factors and spatial scales , 2009, Biological Invasions.

[18]  Omri Allouche,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS) , 2006 .

[19]  M. Araújo,et al.  Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling , 2006 .

[20]  G. Ficetola,et al.  Potential range of the invasive fish rotan (Perccottus glenii) in the Holarctic , 2011, Biological Invasions.

[21]  Antonio DiTommaso,et al.  Climate change and weed adaptation: can evolution of invasive plants lead to greater range expansion than forecasted? , 2011 .

[22]  M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Climate change and plant invasions: restoration opportunities ahead? , 2009 .

[23]  M. Austin,et al.  Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale , 2011 .

[24]  M. Austin.  Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches , 2007 .

[25]  J. Etterson,et al.  Rapid climate change and the rate of adaptation: insight from experimental quantitative genetics. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[26]  D. Padilla,et al.  PREDICTING THE LIKELIHOOD OF EURASIAN WATERMILFOIL PRESENCE IN LAKES, A MACROPHYTE MONITORING TOOL , 2000 .

[27]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists , 2011 .

[28]  R. Meentemeyer,et al.  Equilibrium or not? Modelling potential distribution of invasive species in different stages of invasion , 2012 .

[29]  John A. Silander,et al.  Identifying hotspots for plant invasions and forecasting focal points of further spread , 2009 .

[30]  A. Peterson,et al.  Use of niche models in invasive species risk assessments , 2011, Biological Invasions.

[31]  R. Real,et al.  AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models , 2008 .

[32]  Dan Minchin,et al.  A checklist of alien and cryptogenic aquatic species in Ireland. , 2007 .

[33]  G. Newell,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models more thoroughly , 2009 .

[34]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[35]  M. Leishman,et al.  Different climatic envelopes among invasive populations may lead to underestimations of current and future biological invasions , 2009 .

[36]  J. Leathwick,et al.  Predicting spread of invasive macrophytes in New Zealand lakes using indirect measures of human accessibility , 2012 .

[37]  Hiroshi Hosobe.  A Hierarchical Framework for Integrating Constraints with Graph Layouts , 2001, INTERACT.

[38]  C. Capinha,et al.  Assessing the environmental requirements of invaders using ensembles of distribution models , 2011 .

[39]  H. H. Birks,et al.  Species–environmental relationships of aquatic macrophytes in Northern Ireland , 2001 .

[40]  D. Richardson,et al.  Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. , 2006, Ecology.

[41]  Distribution models of invasive plants over-estimate potential impact , 2013, Biological Invasions.

[42]  A. Dervieux,et al.  Association between aquatic vegetation and landscape indicators of human pressure , 2003, Wetlands.

[43]  John Sibert,et al.  AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[44]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  Improving National-Scale Invasion Maps: Tamarisk in the Western United States , 2011 .

[45]  David M. Lodge,et al.  Boats, Pathways, and Aquatic Biological Invasions: Estimating Dispersal Potential with Gravity Models , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[46]  G. Moisen,et al.  PresenceAbsence: An R Package for Presence Absence Analysis , 2008 .

[47]  J. Elith,et al.  Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time , 2009 .

[48]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling , 2008 .

[49]  J. Schnase,et al.  Risk Analysis for Biological Hazards: What We Need to Know about Invasive Species , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[50]  Michelle R. Leishman,et al.  Invasion hotspots for non‐native plants in Australia under current and future climates , 2012 .