Modeling Contextual Concerns in Enterprise Architecture

Enterprise Architecture approaches are used to provide rigorous descriptions of the organization-wide environment, manage the alignment of deployed services to the organization's mission, end ensure a clear separation of the concerns addressed in an architecture. Thus, an effective Enterprise Architecture approach assists in the management of relations and dependencies of any components of the organization environment and supports the integration and evolution of the architecture. However, the quality of that approach is strongly influenced by the precision of the architecture context description, a fact which is not always recognized. This paper focuses on the architecture context description and addresses the gap between the stakeholders' concerns and the resulting architecture. Based on a combination of established references and standards, we show how an explicit integration of the architecture context into the architecture model improves the linking of concerns and key elements of the architecture vision. We apply our approach to a subject of increasing concern in the Information Systems area: longevity of information. Digital preservation is an interdisciplinary problem, but existent initiatives address it in a very domain-centric way, making it impossible to integrate documented knowledge into an overall organization architecture. We analyze several references and models and derive a description of the architecture context and a capability model that supports incremental development through an explicit distinction between systems and their capabilities. The presented approach allows not just any organization to assess their current digital preservation awareness and evolve their architectures to address this challenge, but in particular demonstrates the added value of an explicit architecture context model in an Enterprise Architecture approach.

[1]  Irwin Brown,et al.  Strategic business-IT alignment, and factors of influence : a case study in a public tertiary education institution , 2004, South Afr. Comput. J..

[2]  Barbara Sierman,et al.  Component Business Model for Digital Repositories: A Framework for Analysis , 2008, iPRES.

[3]  Andreas Rauber,et al.  Systematic planning for digital preservation: evaluating potential strategies and building preservation plans , 2009, International Journal on Digital Libraries.

[4]  Gerrit Muller,et al.  The Concept of Reference Architectures , 2010, Syst. Eng..

[5]  Brian W. Mar System requirements for water resource systems , 1998 .

[6]  Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al.  On Utility-based Selection of Architecture-Modelling Concepts , 2005, APCCM.

[7]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  Designing Digital Preservation Solutions: A Risk Management-Based Approach , 2010, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[8]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Smart Information and Knowledge Management: Advances, Challenges, and Critical Issues , 2010, Smart Information and Knowledge Management.

[9]  N Beagrie,et al.  Preservation Management of Digital Materials: A Handbook , 2001 .

[10]  Sarah Higgins PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata , 2009 .

[11]  Matthias Hemmje,et al.  Modeling Context for Digital Preservation , 2010, Smart Information and Knowledge Management.

[12]  Mathias Ekstedt,et al.  Enterprise Architecture Meta Models for IT/Business Alignment Situations , 2010, 2010 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference.

[13]  Standard for Software Life Cycle Processes — Risk Management , 2001 .

[14]  Susanne Dobratz,et al.  The nestor Catalogue of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repository Evaluation and Certification , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..

[15]  Jean Dryden The Open Archival Information System Reference Model , 2009 .

[16]  Bernhard Rumpe,et al.  Evolving Software Architecture Descriptions of Critical Systems , 2010, Computer.

[17]  John A. Zachman,et al.  A Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1987, IBM Syst. J..

[18]  Susan Hamburger Preservation Management of Digital Materials: A Handbook , 2003 .

[19]  Rlg Oclc,et al.  Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsibilities , 2002 .

[20]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  A Reference Architecture For Digital Preservation , 2010, iPRES.

[21]  W. V. Grembergen Strategies for Information Technology Governance , 2003 .

[22]  José Luis Borbinha,et al.  Modeling digital preservation capabilities in enterprise architecture , 2011, dg.o '11.