Classification before Segmentation: Improved U-Net Prostate Segmentation

Prostate segmentation is a necessary pre-processing step for computer-aided detection and diagnosis algorithms for prostate disorders and associated cancers. Deep learning models like U-Net offer the potential for performing classification and segmentation in a single step. We evaluated the U-Net model for prostate segmentation on 1,235 Magnetic Resonance (MR) images from 39 patients with prostate cancer. On our data set, the U-Net models generated a substantial number of false-positive predictions (average precision of 67.6%). We propose separating classification and segmentation into distinct tasks implemented via a pipeline. Our classifier achieved an average ROC AUC of 97.7% (SD 1.0%) in four-fold cross-fold validation. Compared to the U-Net model alone, our pipeline increased overall agreement between the predicted and human-annotated masks (Dice score of 0.907 vs 0.758 and precision of 83.2% vs 67.6%) without a significant loss in recall (83.4% vs 85.6%). Performing classification and segmentation in a single step is a desirable goal. Our results suggest, however, that improvements are still needed before U-Net offers comparable precision to using a separate classifier.

[1]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[2]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Discriminating Low-Grade From High-Grade Prostate Cancer , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi,et al.  V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation , 2016, 2016 Fourth International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV).

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2017 , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  MRI–ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy , 2013, Current opinion in urology.

[6]  Kenneth A. Iczkowski,et al.  Radio-pathomic Maps of Epithelium and Lumen Density Predict the Location of High-Grade Prostate Cancer , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  H. Aerts,et al.  Deep Learning for Fully-Automated Localization and Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on Multiparametric MR , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[8]  P. Box Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer , 2011 .

[9]  Morikatsu Wada,et al.  MRI scans significantly change target coverage decisions in radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer , 2014, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[10]  Leland McInnes,et al.  UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reduction , 2018, ArXiv.

[11]  Florian Jung,et al.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: The PROMISE12 challenge , 2014, Medical Image Anal..