Perceived distance of targets in convex mirrors

We investigated the perceived distance of targets in convex and plane mirrors. In Experiment 1, 20 subjects matched the distance of targets in a real scene to the distance of a virtual target in different mirrors. The matched distances were much larger for convex mirrors than for a plane mirror. In Experiment 2, 20 subjects viewed two targets in a mirror and adjusted their own positions so that the distance to the closer target was perceived to equal the distance between the targets. The mean distance to the closer target was smaller for the convex mirrors than for the plane mirror. In Experiment 3, 20 subjects adjusted the position of a target so that the distance to it in a mirror was perceived to equal the distance designated by the experimenter. The best-fitting power functions showed that the scaling factors were larger for the convex mirrors than for the plane mirror, but the exponents were smaller for the convex mirrors than for the plane mirror. It is suggested that distance in the convex mirrors was perceived to be larger than in the plane mirror, and that the growth of perceived distance in the convex mirrors was slower than in the plane mirror.

[1]  R. Toye,et al.  The effect of viewing position on the perceived layout of space , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Atsuki Higashiyama,et al.  Perceived size and distance as a perceptual conflict between two processing modes , 1977 .

[3]  William Epstein,et al.  Size and distance judgments under reduced conditions of viewing , 1969 .

[4]  H. W. Mertens,et al.  Perceived depth between familiar objects. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Olin W. Smith,et al.  Perception of Depth in Photographs , 1958 .

[6]  H E Ross.  Water, fog and the size-distance invariance hypothesis. , 1967, British journal of psychology.

[7]  Joachim F. Wohlwill,et al.  Texture of the stimulus field and age as variables in the perception of relative distance in photographic slides , 1965 .

[8]  O. W. Smith.  Comparison of Apparent Depth in a Photograph Viewed from Two Distances , 1958 .

[9]  S M Luria,et al.  Estimates of size and distance underwater. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  O. W. Smith,et al.  Judgments of size and distance in photographs. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  W. Gogel,et al.  THE TENDENCY TO SEE OBJECTS AS EQUIDISTANT AND ITS INVERSE RELATION TO LATERAL SEPARATION , 1956 .

[12]  A. S. Gilinsky.  Perceived size and distance in visual space. , 1951, Psychological review.

[13]  Michael Cook,et al.  The judgment of distance on a plane surface , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J. Bengston,et al.  Optic array determinants of apparent distance and size in pictures. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  I. P. Christensen,et al.  Psychophysics , 2019, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[16]  Ralph Norman Haber,et al.  Visual angle as a determinant of perceived interobject distance , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  W C GOGEL,et al.  PERCEPTION OF DEPTH FROM BINOCULAR DISPARITY. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  W C Gogel,et al.  The sensing of retinal size. , 1969, Vision research.

[20]  Atsuki Higashiyama,et al.  The perception of size and distance under monocular observation , 1979 .

[21]  M. Hagen,et al.  On a neglected variable in theories of pictorial perception: Truncation of the visual field , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  Underwater Distance Distortion within the Manual Work Space , 1970 .

[23]  T. E. Berghage,et al.  Perception and performance under water , 1975 .

[24]  Miguelina Guirao,et al.  Loudness, reciprocality, and partition scales. , 1962 .