A performance indicator for structures under natural fire

Abstract Fires in buildings are characterized by a heating phase followed by a cooling phase, yet the effects of the latter on structures are not well covered in the current approaches to structural fire engineering. Indeed the actual requirement of non-occurrence of structural failure at peak temperature does not guarantee against a delayed failure during or after the cooling phase of a fire, which puts at risk the fire brigades and people proceeding to a building inspection after a fire. Therefore there is an urgent need to better comprehend and characterize the materials and structures behavior under decreasing temperatures. Sensitivity to delayed failure of a structural component depends on its typology and constituting materials. In particular, two structural components with the same Fire Resistance rating ( R ) under standardized fire may exhibit very distinct behavior under natural fire, one of them being more prone to delayed failure than the other. With the aim of quantifying this effect, a new indicator is proposed that characterizes the performance of structures under natural fire conditions. The paper presents the methodology to derive this new indicator as well as results for different typologies of structural components. Parametric analyses highlight the prime influence of constitutive material and thermal inertia of the element on the post-peak behavior. Used in conjunction with the Fire Resistance rating, it is shown how the new indicator carries additional and significant information for classifying structural systems in terms of their fire performance and propensity to delayed failure.

[1]  Ivica Boko,et al.  Reduction of Postfire Properties of High-Strength Concrete , 2013 .

[2]  Thomas Gernay,et al.  Structural behaviour of concrete columns under natural fires , 2013 .

[3]  Richard Bukowski,et al.  Emergency egress from buildings , 2009 .

[4]  Thomas Gernay,et al.  Effect of Transient Creep Strain Model on the Behavior of Concrete Columns Subjected to Heating and Cooling , 2012 .

[5]  Serdar Selamet,et al.  Modeling and Behavior of Steel Plate Connections Subject to Various Fire Scenarios , 2010 .

[6]  Ove Pettersson,et al.  On the Fire Resistance of Structural Steel Elements Derived from Standard Fire Tests or by Calculation , 1980 .

[7]  Jean-Marc Franssen,et al.  SAFIR. A thermal/structural program modelling structures under fire , 2003 .

[8]  Jean-Marc Franssen,et al.  Test Results and Model for the Residual Compressive Strength of Concrete After a Fire , 2011 .

[9]  Venkatesh Kodur,et al.  Enhancing the fire resistance of composite floor assemblies through the use of steel fiber reinforced concrete , 2011 .

[10]  Jean-Marc Franssen,et al.  A formulation of the Eurocode 2 concrete model at elevated temperature that includes an explicit term for transient creep , 2012 .

[11]  Venkatesh Kodur,et al.  Simplified approach for evaluating residual strength of fire-exposed reinforced concrete columns , 2013 .

[12]  T. T. Lie,et al.  Calculation of the fire resistance of steel hollow structural section columns filled with plain concrete , 1994 .

[13]  Ulf Wickström,et al.  Comments on calculation of temperature in fire-exposed bare steel structures in prEN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3—design of steel structures—Part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design , 2005 .

[14]  George C. Yao,et al.  Experimental research on post-fire behaviour of reinforced concrete columns , 2009 .

[15]  Venkatesh Kodur,et al.  Fire resistance of concrete encased steel columns under 3- and 4-side standard heating , 2011 .

[16]  Jean-Marc Franssen.  Stress strain relationship of Tempcore steel after heating up to 650°C and cooling , 1993 .

[17]  Leroy Gardner,et al.  Post-fire behaviour of reinforced concrete stub columns confined by circular steel tubes , 2014 .

[18]  Alen Harapin,et al.  Experimental verification of a newly developed implicit creep model for steel structures exposed to fire , 2013 .

[19]  K. F. Chung,et al.  Composite column design to Eurocode 4 : based on DD ENV 1994-1-1: 1994 Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures: part 1.1: general rules and rules for buildings , 1994 .

[20]  Venkatesh Kodur,et al.  An Approach for Evaluating the Fire Resistance of CFHSS Columns under Design Fire Scenarios , 2009 .

[21]  Danny Hopkin.  Predicting the thermal response of timber structures in natural fires using computational ‘heat of hydration’ principles , 2013 .

[22]  Daxu Zhang,et al.  Experimental and parametric study on the post-fire behavior of tubular T-joint , 2012 .