Understanding Web home page perception

A home page is the gateway to an organization's Web site. To design effective Web home pages, it is necessary to understand the fundamental drivers of user's perception of Web pages. Not only do designers have to understand potential users' frame of mind, they also have at their choosing a stupefying array of attributes – including numerous font types, audio, video, and graphics – all of which can be arranged on a page in different ways, compounding the complexity of the design task. A theoretical model capable of explaining user reactions at a molar level should be invaluable to Web designers as a complement to prevalent intuitive and heuristic approaches. Such a model transcends piecemeal page attributes to focus on overall Web page perceptions of users. Reasoning that people perceive the cyberspace of Web pages in ways similar to their perception of physical places, we use Kaplan and Kaplan's informational model of place perception from the field of environmental psychology to predict that only two dimensions: understanding of information on a Web page, and the involvement potential of a Web page, should adequately capture Web page perception at a molar level. We empirically verify the existence of these dimensions and develop valid scales for measuring them. Using a home page as a stimulus in a lab experiment, we find that understanding and involvement together account for a significant amount of the variance in the attitude toward the Web page and in the intention to browse the underlying Web site. We show that the informational model is a parsimonious and powerful theoretical framework to measure users' perceptions of Web home pages and it could potentially serve as a guide to Web page design and testing efforts.

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing web usability , 1999 .

[2]  Jennifer Fleming,et al.  Web Navigation: Designing the User Experience , 1998 .

[3]  S. Kaplan Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition , 1987 .

[4]  Ping Gisela M Paul Veerapong Zhang,et al.  Important Design Features in Different Web Site Domains: An Empirical Study of User Perceptions , 2001 .

[5]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[6]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Cognitive Set and the Perception of Place , 1981 .

[7]  Louisa Ha,et al.  Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites , 1998 .

[8]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Characteristic, Beneficial, and Image Attributes in Consumer Judgments of Similarity and Preference , 1993 .

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[10]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[11]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[12]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Markor: A Measure of Market Orientation , 1993 .

[13]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Businesses as Buildings: Metrics for the Architectural Quality of Internet Businesses , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  R. Eric Reidenbach,et al.  General Living Systems Theory and Marketing: A Framework for Analysis , 1981 .

[15]  Jacob Jacoby,et al.  Consumer Research: How valid and useful are all our consumer behavior research findings? , 1978 .

[16]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[17]  Prashant C. Palvia,et al.  Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  Usability Science. I: Foundations , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward The Site II: New Information , 2002, Journal of Advertising Research.

[20]  Anand Kumar,et al.  Web Commercials and Advertising Hierarchy-of-Effects , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[21]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Trait Aspects of Vanity: Measurement and Relevance to Consumer Behavior , 1995 .

[22]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[23]  Barbee Teasley,et al.  Industry briefs: MONKEYmedia , 2001, INTR.

[24]  J. Jacoby Consumer Research: A State of the Art Review , 1978 .

[25]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing information-abundant web sites: issues and recommendations , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  J. Pfeffer Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[27]  Robert J. Pavur,et al.  Information quality of commericial web site home pages: an explorative analysis , 2000, ICIS.

[28]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations , 1996 .

[29]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  Internet retail store design: How the user interface influences traffic and sales , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  Wesley S. Shu,et al.  Will the New Economy Emerge as Information Technology Pays Off? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[33]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the user interface (2nd ed.): strategies for effective human-computer interaction , 1992 .

[34]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective , 1989 .

[35]  Matthew Lombard,et al.  At the Heart of It All: The Concept of Presence , 2006 .

[36]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[37]  Russell I. Haley Benefit Segmentation: A Decision-oriented Research Tool , 1968 .

[38]  Melinda Korzaan,et al.  Going with the Flow: Predicting Online Purchase Intentions , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[40]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  An Integrative Approach to the Assessment of E-Commerce Quality , 2002, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[41]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  Perception and landscape: Conceptions and misconceptions. , 1979 .

[42]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[43]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[44]  G. Moser,et al.  Social Legibility, The Cognitive Map and Urban Behaviour , 1998 .

[45]  Lopo L. Rego,et al.  What makes commercial Web pages popular , 1998 .

[46]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[47]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations , 1976 .

[48]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[49]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. , 1996 .

[50]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Attitude Toward the Site , 1999 .

[51]  Jane Webster,et al.  Audience engagement in multimedia presentations , 1997, DATB.

[52]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[53]  Annie Lang,et al.  Formal Features of Cyberspace: Relationships between Web Page Complexity and Site Traffic , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[54]  Douglas J. Gillan,et al.  Whither the Science of Human-Computer Interaction? A Debate Involving Researchers and Practitioners , 1998 .

[55]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Empirically validated web page design metrics , 2001, CHI.

[56]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  A Consumer-Based Methodology for the Identification of New Product Ideas , 1974 .

[57]  Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh,et al.  The content and design of web sites: an empirical study , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[59]  Laura Marie Leventhal,et al.  Experience of Programming Beauty: Some Patterns of Programming Aesthetics , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[60]  Terry J. Brown,et al.  Environmental Preference , 1989 .

[61]  B. Ratchford The New Economic Theory of Consumer Behavior: An Interpretive Essay , 1975 .

[62]  Gisela M. von Dran,et al.  User Expectations and Rankings of Quality Factors in Different Web Site Domains , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[63]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  HEDONIC AND UTILITARIAN MOTIVATIONS FOR ONLINE RETAIL SHOPPING BEHAVIOR , 2001 .

[64]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material , 1972 .

[65]  Thomas S. Tullis Is User Interface Design Just Common Sense? , 1993, HCI.

[66]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[67]  Robert M. Itami,et al.  Mystery in an Information Processing Model of Landscape Preference , 1985, Landscape Journal.

[68]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[69]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism. , 1992 .

[70]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Web Home Page Complexity and Communication Effectiveness , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Electronic window dressing: impression management with Websites , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[72]  A. Shapiro,et al.  On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential Chi-square statistics , 1985 .